Print 65 comment(s) - last by Chillin1248.. on Aug 16 at 2:50 AM

  (Source: Lockheed Martin)
The Israeli government will receive a first order of 20 JSF by the end of 2015, with

Israel is still considering whether or not it wants to purchase the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II (also known as the Joint Strike Fighter) aircraft, as Defense Minister Ehud Barak and other Israeli government officials discuss the expensive investment.

Previous approval granted Israel the right to purchase 75 JSFs, but Israel initially only wants just 20 aircraft.  The country expects to pay more than $140 million for each F-35, and it's unknown if Israel will be able to install all of its own equipment into the aircraft.

Previously, the U.S. government said it would remove some of its own hardware and offer an alternative or allow the purchasing nation to make slight alternations.  Continued negotiations take place, but it's likely Israel will fulfill the rest of its order after the first 20 aircraft are accepted.

"We work according to the assumption that other countries will receive the jet, and that is why we need to be the first,” an IDF officer recently disclosed.  "The JSF not only provides unbelievable capabilities, but will also assist Israel in boosting its deterrence.”

After agreed upon configurations, Israel will begin to receive its new aircraft by the end of 2015, with future orders expected to arrive shortly after.  Although there are some early contract problems, Israel and the United States are expected to come to a fair agreement as quickly as possible.

Lockheed Martin has been given approval to sell the aircraft to select countries, but cannot offer certain electronics and hardware aboard the aircraft.

The Australian military is interested in purchasing up to 100 JSF, but want to see additional testing information before purchasing the costly aircraft.  If an agreement with Lockheed cannot be finalized, it's possible Australia will work with Russia.  Canada is expected to purchase up to 65 JSF -- negotiations are ongoing with other countries as well.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Not dogging Israel
By seraphim1982 on 8/13/2010 10:32:35 AM , Rating: 0
Israel, is the biggest baby in the world. They complain about everything and everyone around them, when they have the most advanced weapons, a wad load of cash, a too much pride....

Don't say they need the advanced weapons to save themselves, as they getting a few billion a year in aid, a lot of which goes to weapons manufacturing, which they resell. They have a nuclear bomb, yet DO NOT sign the NPT, and deny it at every chance, with their big boyfriend the US standing behind them. The is hypocracy of the modern world.

RE: Not dogging Israel
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/10, Rating: -1
RE: Not dogging Israel
By heffeque on 8/13/10, Rating: -1
RE: Not dogging Israel
By ClownPuncher on 8/13/10, Rating: -1
RE: Not dogging Israel
By UzairH on 8/13/10, Rating: -1
RE: Not dogging Israel
By SPOOFE on 8/13/10, Rating: 0
RE: Not dogging Israel
By aston12 on 8/14/10, Rating: -1
RE: Not dogging Israel
By SLeeeper on 8/15/2010 3:50:43 AM , Rating: 2
Secondly even though the fact that the holocaust was obviously terrible there must be a reason why almost no country in the region supports israel.

Yes there is a good reason AND if you had ever opened a history book; you would have the answer...

You have every right to believe as you will; but please educate your self on the subject of the Jews and WWII before you rattle off an ignorant statement such as the one I quoted...or your whole post for that matter.

RE: Not dogging Israel
By Reclaimer77 on 8/14/10, Rating: 0
RE: Not dogging Israel
By AliShawkat on 8/14/10, Rating: -1
RE: Not dogging Israel
By Reclaimer77 on 8/14/10, Rating: 0
RE: Not dogging Israel
By Paj on 8/14/2010 4:29:47 AM , Rating: 3
Actually, Palestine was split up by the UN, and Israel was created. The war followed shortly acter this.

RE: Not dogging Israel
By SPOOFE on 8/14/2010 12:16:53 PM , Rating: 4
The British Mandate for Palestine, also known as the Palestine Mandate and the British Mandate of Palestine, was a legal instrument for the administration of Palestine, the draft of which was formally confirmed by the League of Nations on 24 July 1922 and which came into effect on 26 September 1923.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine... recommended the termination of the British Mandate for Palestine and the partition of the territory into two states, one Jewish and one Arab, with the Jerusalem-Bethlehem area being under special international protection, administered by the United Nations.
Prior to WWI, that area was part of the Ottoman empire, which lost. After WWI, it was controlled by the British. Shortly after WWII, Israel was created. Shortly after Israel was created, they were attacked and successfully defended themselves, taking territory in the process. They still hold that territory.

I don't know where, within that chain of events, justification for the whole "occupied Palestine" notion can be found. "Occupied British Mandate", maybe. "Occupied Ottoman Territory", sure. But one might as well call France "Occupied Gaul" for all the accuracy and relevancy it would bring.

RE: Not dogging Israel
By jmunjr on 8/13/10, Rating: 0
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki