backtop


Print 45 comment(s) - last by theslug.. on Nov 20 at 2:51 PM


The FCC complains that Google and Verizon's net neutrality proposal doesn't give it enough authority.  (Source: South Park Studios/Comedy Central)
FCC says that the only way net neutrality will be had is by handing it more power

After a long history of debate, Google and Verizon finally came to a basic framework of proposed net neutrality policy.  The policy would look to regulate wired traffic, ensuring that "legal" traffic was not slowed and that ISPs would not be able to charge premiums for "speed lanes".

The Federal Communications Commission, which is currently in the process of crafting net neutrality legislation to bring before Congress, was surprisingly dismissive of the proposal in a brief public comment.

FCC Chairman Michael Copps remarks [PDF], "Some will claim this announcement moves the discussion forward.  That's one of its many problems. It is time to move a decision forward—a decision to reassert FCC authority over broadband telecommunications, to guarantee an open Internet now and forever, and to put the interests of consumers in front of the interests of giant corporations."

The comment raises questions about exactly what kind of net neutrality "authority" the FCC is seeking over the nation's ISPs and internet wires.  After all, the Google/Verizon proposal called for mild FCC regulation and a fine architecture for those who don't comply, with fines of up to $2M USD.

It should be interesting to see exactly what the FCC has in mind instead.

The FCC taking input from Google, Verizon, AT&T, Microsoft, and others in the process of crafting its net neutrality legislation.  It is unclear when it will finish the draft of its legislation for Congress.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What a Shock!
By Reclaimer77 on 8/10/2010 8:01:28 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
I'd say a body like the FCC whose only agenda is (supposedly) for the good of the people is preferable to some of the worlds biggest corporations whose business interests may very well be in conflict with some of the principles of net-neutrality.


Are we talking about the same FCC here?? The FCC that's been bleeping, banning, censoring and silencing artists since the 1930's? The FCC that drove Howard Stern off radio? The FCC who tried to ban "drug music" like Puff the Magic Dragon??

THAT FCC?? Suddenly they are out of the censorship business and into the "good of the people's free speech" business? Suddenly they are all about your Net's Neutrality?


RE: What a Shock!
By FITCamaro on 8/11/2010 8:36:48 AM , Rating: 2
Drones don't see and can't hear what they disagree with.


RE: What a Shock!
By snyper256 on 8/11/2010 10:09:16 AM , Rating: 2
It's better than the whiny, greedy telcos, who are too cheap to expand their infrastructure to meet demand so they want to cut bandwidth and rake in money from specialized traffic.

If they get their way, we'll see metered and packaged internet services, just like wireless and cable TV. Just sickening.

They need to be put in line.


"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki