backtop


Print 84 comment(s) - last by Bateluer.. on Aug 17 at 6:55 AM


  (Source: montana.edu)

  (Source: montana.edu)
The three-horned dinosaur may have been just a different stage of the Torosaurus.

Some paleontologists are rewriting the history of the dinosaur. Experts have concluded that the Triceratops may have never existed, according to the Montana State University News Service and the Chicago Tribune. 

Since the 1800's, scientists have believed that the Triceratops and the Torosaurus were two separate dinosaurs, but now two researchers at Montana State University have concluded that the Triceratops and the Torosaurus were actually one in the same -- at different stages of growth.   

Both dinosaurs had a three-horned skull but while the Triceratops had a smaller frill, the Torosaurus had a larger frill with two large holes in it. 

MSU paleontologists John Scannella and Jack Horner noticed while considering more than 100 years of dinosaur research, that the remains of a young Torosaurus had never been found.

After participating in a 10-year study led by Horner, researchers concluded that the Triceratops hadn't lived long enough to fully develop the frill that would identify them as a Torosaurus.  Horner and Scannella published their findings in the July edition of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

According to Scannella, the confusion over Triceratops and Torosaurus was easy to understand, because juvenile dinosaurs looked very different, and their skulls changed radically as they matured.

"Paleontologists are at a disadvantage because we can't go out into the field and observe a living Triceratops grow up from a baby to an adult," Scannella said. "We have to put together the story based on fossils. In order to get the complete story, you need to have a large sample of fossils from many individuals representing different growth stages."

Recent studies by scientists have revealed extreme changes in the skulls of pachycephalosaurs, tyrannosaurs and other dinosaurs that died out about 65 million years ago in North America.

Scannella and Horner examined more than 50 Triceratops specimens for their study.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why does Triceratops get the shaft?
By smegz on 8/10/2010 2:06:24 PM , Rating: 5
Triceratops will not get the shaft. Torosaurus will. Since the name Triceratops was used first, the Torosaurus will now be called Triceratops. Is it too much to ask for a little thoroughness in reporting?

http://io9.com/5606111/triceratops-controversy-sha...

"Because the Triceratops was named first, that designation will be kept and the name Torosaurus stricken from the records. Farewell, Torosaurus."


RE: Why does Triceratops get the shaft?
By AssBall on 8/10/2010 3:44:30 PM , Rating: 5
Thoroughness in reporting? Here?

I'll get back to you when I finish laughing.


RE: Why does Triceratops get the shaft?
By borismkv on 8/10/2010 6:15:11 PM , Rating: 5
They're very thorough here. They thoroughly copy the work of someone else.


RE: Why does Triceratops get the shaft?
By TSS on 8/11/2010 12:04:55 PM , Rating: 2
That is not true. Last i saw an article in which "micro-array's" that where implanted in the brain, with 2 sources using that word, get changed to "computer cursors" that get implanted. Even google can't find any definition of "cursor" that you would want to have implanted in your brain.

They can't even copy right. But it's entertaining, though.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki