Print 35 comment(s) - last by lifeson22.. on Aug 12 at 3:26 AM

Chevrolet Equinox fuel cell vehicle  (Source: DailyTech)
New catalyst is 2000 times more tolerant of carbon monoxide

The quest for alternative fuel sources that are cleaner, cheaper, and more abundant than traditional fossil fuels is underway around the world. Researchers are studying everything from battery power to solar energy and fuel cells.

Fuel cells hold great promise and have long been studied as alternatives to fossil fuels. Traditionally, the problems plaguing fuel cell-powered vehicles that run from hydrogen include how to produce the hydrogen cheaply and how to store it safely. Despite issues that still surround fuel cell-powered vehicles, a study conducted in June by Pike Research found that within the next decade 670,000 fuel cell powered vehicles would be sold each year.

Researchers at the Cornell University Energy Materials Center have made a breakthrough discovery that will make hydrogen fuel cell power much more economical. The breakthrough comes in the form of a new catalyst that uses platinum nanoparticles. Platinum is traditionally used in fuel cells as the catalyst, but platinum is expensive and can be easily deactivated in the presence of even low levels of carbon monoxide rendering the fuel cell inoperable.

The Cornell researchers have discovered a method of making the platinum catalyst able to withstand thousands of times more carbon monoxide. The process also makes the platinum catalyst material much cheaper to produce. The team created the catalyst using platinum nano particles that are deposited on a support material of titanium oxide. The team then added tungsten to increase the electrical conductivity of the catalyst. The resulting platinum catalyst is 2,000 times more resistant to carbon monoxide than a catalyst using pure platinum. 

That higher resistance to carbon monoxide means that the fuel cell can burn hydrogen with as much as 2% carbon monoxide in it. The researchers say this is very important because hydrogen derived from petroleum has a high concentration of carbon monoxide in it. The ability for the catalyst to withstand more carbon monoxide eliminates the need to clean the hydrogen as much, thereby reducing the cost of making hydrogen.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hydrogen derived from hydrocarbons....
By tng on 8/3/2010 11:03:29 AM , Rating: 5
Unless the hydrogen is trapped underground with oil, and would go to waste otherwise, this is a monumentally dumb idea, although not quite as bad as turning food into fuel on a large scale.

The most used way of getting hydrogen is by using natural gas. Normally, yes, allot of the oil wells out there also produce large quantities of natural gas so you are right in one sense, it is just down there with the oil in allot of cases.

Since natural gas is mainly just methane, it can be harvested from other sources, sewage treatment plants, landfills, dairy farms.... the list could go on for a long time. I don't see this as that much of an issue of where it comes from, just that it is cleaner to use. I drive by a sewage treatment plant everyday here in CA where there is a burner going all the time to dispose of methane that is a byproduct of the treatment process. No one is using this gas for a useful purpose.

Also many companies out there produce NG cars that are almost zero emissions now (and have for years). Problem is I don't really see many of the self righteous enviros out there taking advantage of this. They want to be clean, but mainly they just want to tear down big oil.

RE: Hydrogen derived from hydrocarbons....
By Dr of crap on 8/3/2010 12:51:36 PM , Rating: 1
As to the two posters above - that is my point!
Why use oil / natural gas to make hydrogen to use in fuel cell cars, when the idea behind fuel cell cars is to REDCUCE our depense on oil!?
If there is no good way to come up with hydrogen then it is a lost idea. ( for now )
Now the use of natural gas to power our cars is something I can't understand why it isn't being pushed harder.
Cars could also be running on the methane from the garabe dumps as well, as to the poster above. Natural gas is plentiful, and the infrastruture is there. Seems to me to be the next best thing to use to get off oil, not hydrogen! After all the US has a lot of natrual gas reserves.

By homebredcorgi on 8/3/2010 1:41:00 PM , Rating: 2
"when the idea behind fuel cell cars is to REDCUCE our depense on oil!?"

Maybe that isn't the only reason?

For one, the USA sits on the largest stock of natural gas in the world (by far) and the hydrogen can be extracted from it.

RE: Hydrogen derived from hydrocarbons....
By JediJeb on 8/3/2010 2:54:32 PM , Rating: 3
One reason to use petroleum for the hydrogen source is that instead of the 30-35% efficiency you get from burning it in a normal combustion engine, I believe using it for a source of hydrogen for a fuel cell you jump up to over 60% efficiency, though I may be totally wrong. But if that is correct then it would make a lot of sense to use the petroleum in a fuel cell as you would need less of it to do the same amount of work.

RE: Hydrogen derived from hydrocarbons....
By Solandri on 8/3/2010 4:29:04 PM , Rating: 5
This is correct. Burning petroleum in a combustion engine, you're limited by the Carnot efficiency. The maximum energy you can extract is 1 - Tc/Th where Tc is the cold temperature of your heat sink (usually the air for cars), and Th is the high temperature of your engine. For most automobile applications, this puts you around 30% engine efficiency. That is, 30% of the energy in the fuel goes into doing work, the other 70% just creates waste heat.

Fuel cells bypass this by converting the energy directly to electricity instead. They can frequently achieve 60% efficiency, with some fuel cells in the lab hitting over 80% efficiency.

By Etsp on 8/4/2010 3:39:49 AM , Rating: 2
There are some caveats to that as well... That formula assumes that the cooling system itself does not produce energy. Which is true in the vast majority of cases. However, there are means to derive electrical or kinetic energy that also act to cool the engine.

Two examples would be water injection, and peltier plates. Granted, these two methods aren't used much at all, but that doesn't mean there aren't ways to improve the efficiency of an ICE beyond that temperature difference barrier. It would require innovation on the cooling systems, but it's very possible. As far as how practical this is... well, at least it's more practical than some ideas being subsidized.

By namechamps on 8/5/2010 8:38:04 AM , Rating: 1
Exactly and natural gas in a fuel cells is roughly 2x to 3x as efficient as in the average internal combustion vehicle.

Thus natural gas as fuel source + fuel cells will power more vehicles and last longer than internal combustion.

Internal Combustion Engines (otto cycle) are horrible inefficient. 80%+ of potential energy (tank to wheel not just engine efficiency) is wasted as heat.

"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki