Print 18 comment(s) - last by Ammohunt.. on Aug 5 at 1:41 PM

  (Source: Photo by Kamran Jebreili / Associated Press)
Gulf countries to halt BlackBerry services, citing national security fears

On Sunday, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates announced they would be blocking certain services -- Blackberry Messenger, e-mail, and Web browsing -- on Blackberry devices because data exchanged between devices can't be traced, Reuters reported.

"Certain BlackBerry services allow users to act without any legal accountability, causing judicial, social and national security concerns," the United Arab Emirates' Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) said in a statement.

The data can't be traced by local authorities because it is encrypted and sent to offshore servers, frightening authorities who say that it is a threat to national security. India, Bahrain, and France have all expressed concern over the services in the past, as well. 

The U.A.E., which contains economic powerhouse Dubai, will be suspending Blackberry services as of October, while Saudi Arabia is believed to be halting them this month.

"Censorship has got nothing to do with this," Mohammed Al Ghanem, director general of the UAE's TRA, told Reuters

The concerns center particularly on Research In Motion's Blackberry devices, because similar handsets from Nokia and Apple do not route data traffic the same way.

According to the
The Washington Post, the ban will also apply to visitors to the country.


RIM responded to the concerns yesterday by issuing a statement to assure customers their data was safe, even from government wrenching, The Wall Street Journal reported. An excerpt from the report:

RIM said the BlackBerry network was set up so that "no one, including RIM, could access'' customer data, which is encrypted from the time it leaves the device. It added RIM would "simply be unable to accommodate any request'' for a key to decrypt the data, since the company doesn't have the key.

According to Reuters, RIM has more than 41 million Blackberry users worldwide. The ban by U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia, which, when combined, have an estimated 1.2 million users, would affect roughly 3 percent of Blackberry users.

"The UAE market in and of itself is not significant to RIM. A bigger concern would be if it runs into similar issues in a large market such as China, which has similar security concerns, as Google is well aware of," an analyst told Reuters.

The controversy comes just days after rumors of an iPad challenger from RIM began swirling. The tablet device, dubbed the "Blackpad," is expected to get an official announcement from the Canadian company today.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Um, yeah.....
By marvdmartian on 8/3/2010 9:20:53 AM , Rating: 4
"Censorship has got nothing to do with this," Mohammed Al Ghanem, director general of the UAE's TRA, told Reuters.

Um, yeah....I think I'd have to throw the BULLSHIT flag on that one! The UAE members have a track record of being pretty strict in their Muslim beliefs, so censorship would definitely be a good reason for them to block data streams they couldn't track.

Looks like no more secret porn in the UAE!!

RE: Um, yeah.....
By leexgx on 8/3/2010 11:50:12 AM , Rating: 2
an VPN link out side of that state or any state that blocks RIM is all thats needed to fix this block

RE: Um, yeah.....
By Ammohunt on 8/3/2010 1:50:44 PM , Rating: 4
This is what happens when you thrust a primative culture into the modern age. More proof that Muslim culture is not compatible with Western Civilization.

RE: Um, yeah.....
By dubldwn on 8/3/2010 2:14:52 PM , Rating: 2
Read blueeyesm's link below:
While it would be lovely to think our communications were secure from authoritarian observance, most of us accept that there are times when the security services need to intercept electronic communications

This is from the UK. A lot of people think this violation of civil rights is acceptable. Including those in "Western Civilization."

RE: Um, yeah.....
By Ammohunt on 8/3/2010 6:31:49 PM , Rating: 2
A country where as of 2007 the 2nd most popular boy name is Muhammad. Islamification a real threat?

RE: Um, yeah.....
By dashrendar on 8/4/2010 10:27:39 PM , Rating: 1
Well, Muhammad is one of the most popular names in the 'world', so what does that mean, genius? The whole world is becoming a threat to itself maybe?

RE: Um, yeah.....
By Ammohunt on 8/5/2010 1:41:36 PM , Rating: 2
It means you should go get fitted for your Burqua.Allah Ackbar!

RE: Um, yeah.....
By DarkElfa on 8/3/2010 3:21:02 PM , Rating: 2
The Muslim culture as it exists now is not compatible with civilization, period.

RE: Um, yeah.....
By gorehound on 8/3/2010 3:25:17 PM , Rating: 2
I am so sick of that Muslim world and their primitive backwards attitudes.Western world is not compatible with their censored and brainwashed way of life.
I wish for the day when we do not ever have to buy a drop of oil from them.Hope it comes soon.I have no issues with other folks religion but do have issues with human rights and those people over there are so screwed compared to the freedoms we in the western world have.

RE: Um, yeah.....
By dashrendar on 8/4/2010 10:12:20 PM , Rating: 1
Hahah, oh wait you're not joking...

First of all, why do you care? You should be glad they have primitive backwards attitudes, because if they were civilized and had the oil, you would be in deep shit. Haven't you asked yourself why Bush keeps kissing the Saudis' asses instead of punishing them for human rights violations and mind-numbing backwardness?

You know what's worse than primitiveness? Hypocrisy and double standards.. Two things the western civilizations excel at.

RE: Um, yeah.....
By dashrendar on 8/4/2010 10:07:39 PM , Rating: 2
I'm actually with Blackberry on this, but I saw your comment and I had to reply. Now, if it's a religious thing, why doesn't the UAE ban all data services period? Why target Blackberry?

Also, what other primitive culture just came up with the Internet kill switch?

"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki