backtop


Print 102 comment(s) - last by trailmixedup.. on Aug 2 at 7:44 PM


Traffic cops in one small Tenessee town have written a lot of traffic tickets so far this year using a new automated system. In total over 7,300 tickets have been issued.  (Source: Deadline Scotland)
Tennessee town of 17,000 has issued over 7,300 traffic tickets in half year since adopting system

The town of Farragut, Tennessee created quite a stir when it decided [PDF] back in 2006 to look at adopting an automated system to "watch" its town's drivers and automatically give them tickets for running red lights.  The system was finally contracted in 2009 to Redflex INC.  The system was completed in August 2009 with three cameras, and a fourth camera went online this summer.

The early statistics have been released by the town and they're either a staggering statement to how blatantly the town's population violates the law or how automated traffic enforcement systems may be much more active than expected.

In the first and second quarters, 7,168 and 7,213 incidents respectively were recorded by the cameras.  In total, 3,515 and 3,873 citations respectively were issued in the two quarters.  That's about 45 citations a day, or roughly 14 per camera per day (before the fourth camera came online).

To give a further breakdown, for the second quarter, 2,673 of the 7,213 incidents were rejected after review by an officer.  Another 662 incidents were not processed "due to technical issues or lack of information."  And the remaining incidents, as mentioned resulted in citations

Citizens have found it increasingly hard to argue their innocence in the face of glaring video evidence.  This is especially true in the case of rolling stops (slowing, but not fully stopping when turning at a red light).  Some citizens insisted their innocence, but when showed the video gave up their claims, according to the cops.

Perhaps the good thing for citizens is that the citation is merely a non-moving violation, which carries no points and thus does not raise drivers' insurance.  It weighs in at $50 USD per ticket.  The perhaps interesting part is that the language used by various towns in the state indicate that there's a lower standard of Constitutional protections with such systems.  Lawyers for the towns of Chattanooga and Red Bank (where a similar system is deployed) write, "[Drivers] are not entitled to a trial by jury, a presumption of innocence or a heightened burden of proof."

That's typical for civil offenses, which bear a lower burden of proof.  But its atypical for traffic violations, which often carry a presumption of innocence and allow citizens to request a trial by jury.  The shift is likely due to the light penalty associated with the ticket, but it's worrisome because that penalty could be bumped at some point to a full moving violation.

Two $10M USD suits about the system are pending.  However, these suits, which will be heard in court on September 20, seem unlikely to succeed.  After all, the Tennessee Court of Appeals recently denied complaints about Knoxville, Tennessee's similar camera system.

Another concern is the reliability of such systems.  Students in 2008 in Montgomery County, Maryland used fake license plates to spoof similar systems which gave speeding tickets.  The result was multiple people they pranked receiving traffic fines.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: only a matter of time
By sviola on 7/29/2010 11:47:17 AM , Rating: 2
Here in Brazil, the points would go to the owner of the vehicle.

If he was not driving when the ticket is issued, he has two weeks to fill a form requesting to move the point to the person who was driving (and collect copies of license of the person who was driving and his signature on the form). Then the points are moved to the one who was driving.


RE: only a matter of time
By Kurz on 7/29/2010 12:06:12 PM , Rating: 1
I rather have the ability to show up in court.
Another reason I dislike Brazil.


RE: only a matter of time
By sviola on 7/29/2010 1:50:45 PM , Rating: 2
Well, here we don't need to go to court to have everything solved. It takes 10 minutes to fill a form, 10s to photocopy the drivers license and 5s for him to sign the agreement that he was driving the car. The you go to any administration office in town and deliver the form. In a few days the points are moved to the rightful "owner".

Btw, what are the reasons you dislike Brazil? Have you even been there?


RE: only a matter of time
By xsilver on 7/30/2010 12:28:45 AM , Rating: 2
Well its not only in brazil - its the same here in australia too.
Even easier as you dont need to photocopy the drivers license at fault, just a signed paper and mail it off to the infringement office.


RE: only a matter of time
By tmouse on 7/29/2010 2:06:27 PM , Rating: 2
Of course that only works if the person cooperates, what happens if they deny they were driving? Sure you would never let them use the car again (unless you were stupid) but wouldn't the driver still be on the hook unless the other guy basically confesses?


"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki