Print 102 comment(s) - last by trailmixedup.. on Aug 2 at 7:44 PM

Traffic cops in one small Tenessee town have written a lot of traffic tickets so far this year using a new automated system. In total over 7,300 tickets have been issued.  (Source: Deadline Scotland)
Tennessee town of 17,000 has issued over 7,300 traffic tickets in half year since adopting system

The town of Farragut, Tennessee created quite a stir when it decided [PDF] back in 2006 to look at adopting an automated system to "watch" its town's drivers and automatically give them tickets for running red lights.  The system was finally contracted in 2009 to Redflex INC.  The system was completed in August 2009 with three cameras, and a fourth camera went online this summer.

The early statistics have been released by the town and they're either a staggering statement to how blatantly the town's population violates the law or how automated traffic enforcement systems may be much more active than expected.

In the first and second quarters, 7,168 and 7,213 incidents respectively were recorded by the cameras.  In total, 3,515 and 3,873 citations respectively were issued in the two quarters.  That's about 45 citations a day, or roughly 14 per camera per day (before the fourth camera came online).

To give a further breakdown, for the second quarter, 2,673 of the 7,213 incidents were rejected after review by an officer.  Another 662 incidents were not processed "due to technical issues or lack of information."  And the remaining incidents, as mentioned resulted in citations

Citizens have found it increasingly hard to argue their innocence in the face of glaring video evidence.  This is especially true in the case of rolling stops (slowing, but not fully stopping when turning at a red light).  Some citizens insisted their innocence, but when showed the video gave up their claims, according to the cops.

Perhaps the good thing for citizens is that the citation is merely a non-moving violation, which carries no points and thus does not raise drivers' insurance.  It weighs in at $50 USD per ticket.  The perhaps interesting part is that the language used by various towns in the state indicate that there's a lower standard of Constitutional protections with such systems.  Lawyers for the towns of Chattanooga and Red Bank (where a similar system is deployed) write, "[Drivers] are not entitled to a trial by jury, a presumption of innocence or a heightened burden of proof."

That's typical for civil offenses, which bear a lower burden of proof.  But its atypical for traffic violations, which often carry a presumption of innocence and allow citizens to request a trial by jury.  The shift is likely due to the light penalty associated with the ticket, but it's worrisome because that penalty could be bumped at some point to a full moving violation.

Two $10M USD suits about the system are pending.  However, these suits, which will be heard in court on September 20, seem unlikely to succeed.  After all, the Tennessee Court of Appeals recently denied complaints about Knoxville, Tennessee's similar camera system.

Another concern is the reliability of such systems.  Students in 2008 in Montgomery County, Maryland used fake license plates to spoof similar systems which gave speeding tickets.  The result was multiple people they pranked receiving traffic fines.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What a money racket
By Iaiken on 7/29/2010 11:42:58 AM , Rating: 2
So, you have to commit a wrong before you can be fleeced.


Don't want a ticket, don't break the law.

Don't want a citation for your car, don't lend it to people who break the law.

Holy crap! It's just so easy, too bad peoples judgment is often impaired by their "me first, gotta be there 10-minutes ago" attitudes.

RE: What a money racket
By Invane on 7/29/2010 12:50:29 PM , Rating: 2
I think you're missing the point. The argument here is that the system of law, put into place to protect us, is instead being subverted for corporate interest in order to create profit. Does this system improve public safety? If the answer to that question is no, or even uncertainty, then why is Redflex being allowed to profit off the citizenry?

It is the duty of every citizen in the US to look at our government and judicial system critically and to protest when they believe that that system is failing.

The simple blanket 'Don't break the law' response to a rather questionable system is ignorant and will lead to a slow and inevitable loss of our freedom and legal rights.

Criticize the law. Make them explain why that law or system is necessary and improves our lives.

With that said, I do not believe people should run red lights. However, a system that feeds Redflex and the government our money with no improvement to our safety in return (and possibly causing more accidents) is irresponsible and negligent as well as possibly immoral.

RE: What a money racket
By dwalton on 7/29/2010 1:58:30 PM , Rating: 3
Cameras and police officers aren't suppose to determine guilt, thats the job of judges and juries.

Elderly citizen of Mega-City One: (talking to grandson while pointing at Judge Dredd)

"See that motherf#%^er right there, this all started with them motherf#%^ing traffic cameras!!!"

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki