Print 22 comment(s) - last by moenkopi.. on Aug 2 at 12:48 AM

US Naval Station Pt. Loma with solar panels  (Source: Independent Energy Solutions)

  (Source: Industrial Interface)
Five contracts awarded to firms

The U.S. Navy has committed $100 million in contracts for the development and installation of solar arrays at facilities in five U.S. states for both the Navy and Marine Corps.

The U.S. Armed Forces are not new to the application of greener technology. Recently, the Army has began developing and applying hydrogen fuel cell technology to their vehicles and also has HP developing a "Dick Tracy-like" watch that uses solar panels specifically for the U.S. military. 

The Navy has been using solar power as far back as 2002, when they installed a 750-kilowatt solar system in San Diego, California, which was considered the largest federal solar system. The system could power 935 homes during the day. As early as January of this year, the Navy also applied solar energy five rooftops at the Pearl Harbor base in Hawaii.

Now, the Navy is taking their dedication to renewable energy a step further by spending $100 million on five contracts that will apply solar arrays to facilities in Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Arizona for the Navy and the Marine Corps. 

One of the five firms that won contracts for this operation is AECOM Technology Corporation, a global provider of management and technical support services for both government and commercial clients, was selected by the U.S. Navy to fulfill an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract, allowing AECOM to develop the solar power systems.

"The U.S. federal government views renewable energy as an important strategic goal to improve environmental performance, reduce energy costs and enhance energy security at multiple levels," said said John M. Dionisio, AECOM president and chief executive officer. "We are proud to be selected by the U.S. Navy for this important assignment."

AECOM will be teaming up with Solar Power Partners (SPP) during this time. The contract has one base year and four option years, and states that AECOM is to provide "engineering, procurement and construction" of the solar systems while SPP is to finance and own the solar arrays. 

The AECOM-SPP teamup is only one of five firms to receive contracts, which are a total of $100 million in value, and the contractors can "compete for task orders under the terms and conditions of the contract."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What a crock
By surt on 7/29/2010 1:24:21 AM , Rating: 2
Are you kidding? The military is actually the one part of our government that should really care about oil independence. They need to be able to keep fighting even if all of our supply lines are cut off.

RE: What a crock
By Reclaimer77 on 7/29/2010 1:54:26 AM , Rating: 2
lol right, we're going to "fight" with solar tech!??!?

Solar powered ships coming soon, GREAT for night missions!

RE: What a crock
By FITCamaro on 7/29/2010 9:58:02 AM , Rating: 2
Ever heard of the national strategic reserve?

And we wouldn't have to rely on foreign sources if we developed our own energy resources more. Furthermore, if it really came down to it, the American people would get cut off before the military. We do produce oil in this country. The government would merely buy all the supply. Also, our main source of oil is Canada. Its highly unlikely we'll be going to war with them any time soon.

The military would be far better off building small nuclear plants to power its bases and then sell the excess power to the local population. This way the military could actually make money off its power generation. Now biofuel usage makes sense. Because it has the potential of being feasible. Solar power isn't a bad idea for bases in a desert(at least during the daytime). But are we really going to invest the money in solar for a temporary base? Honestly I'd rather see small, portable nuclear reactors developed. They already have ones you can bury in the ground and which last like 25-30 years with no maintenance. Use one of those. When its time to leave, dig it up and take it home. Or just dig it up, remove the nuclear fuel, and destroy it. Better than building a solar plant that's far larger, far more vulnerable to attack, and doesn't work at night.

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki