Print 65 comment(s) - last by rcc.. on Jul 29 at 2:48 PM

The UFC thinks prison time for pirates would KO piracy.  (Source:
"When people start going to jail, people will stop doing it." -- UFC President Dana White on piracy

Zuffa LLC, owned by brothers Lorenzo Fertitta and Frank Fertitta III, is the world's largest provider of pay-per-view content today.  The company owns and operates the Ultimate Fighting Championship, the world's top professional mixed martial arts organization.

The UFC has been among several pay-per-view providers to crack down hard on internet video uploads in recent years.  With fights finding their way onto YouTube and other video sharing sites, the UFC has tried a variety of approaches to cut off the flow of its performances onto the internet.

On Monday, the UFC announced that it has subpoenaed and -- two major live video stream sites.  The UFC's owners claim that the sites' users purchased pay-per-view buys and then rebroadcast them on the web for all to see.

According the UFC a single IP address uploaded streams from UFC 108 and UFC 110, held this year.  These streams respectively drew 36,000 and 78,000 non-paying viewers.

Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, content owners can use subpoenas to force service providers to reveal the identities of individuals who upload infringed content.  The UFC already announced reaching "confidential settlements" with 500 people and businesses for illegal broadcasts and viewing.

UFC President Dana White states, "I can't wait to go after the thieves that are stealing our content.  This is a fight we will not lose."

He hopes that the U.S. Congress adopts the most sweeping provisions of upcoming ACTA pact, which could send those uploading copyrighted materials to prison.  He states, "When people start going to jail, people will stop doing it."

The UFC is a popular piracy target due to the high cost of its PPV buys.  The company airs approximately twelve PPV events annually and sells them for $44.95 each, or $55.95 for an HD version.  In 2009 the UFC is estimated to have sucked in $350M USD in PPV revenue.  However, at January's UFC 106, alone, it estimates that there were 140,000 non-paying viewers of 271 illegal streams, amounting to approximately $6.3M USD in lost revenue.

One driving force behind the UFC's piracy crackdown is also growing competition from smaller competitive leagues like Strikeforce.  Strikeforce has put on a number of recent highly successful events including a recent shocking upset of Russian MMA legend Fedor Emelianenko by Brazil's Fabricio Werdum and a massive knockout by female bantamweight champ, Canada's Sarah Kauffman, over Roxanne Modafferi.  Unlike the UFC, Strikeforce generally televises its main card on cable television thanks to deals with CBS, Showtime, and others.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Reclaimer77 on 7/27/2010 12:04:49 PM , Rating: 0
UFC on PPV is such a ripoff. I can't believe people spend a hundred or whatever dollars to watch hours of -what is essentially- pro wrestling with more dick punching.

By msheredy on 7/27/10, Rating: 0
By Reclaimer77 on 7/27/2010 12:23:06 PM , Rating: 3
Hey calm down buddy. I wouldn't want you to drool all over your new TapouT shirt.

By boochi on 7/27/2010 12:39:29 PM , Rating: 3
Actually in the early days of the UFC there was no rule against groin strikes. Joe Son lost a fight to Keith Hackney at UFC 4 after submitting to repeated strikes to the cock and balls. You might remember Joe Son as the guy who played Random Task in the first Austin Powers movie. Yes he fought in MMA but he retired without ever winning a fight.

By JasonMick on 7/27/2010 12:51:17 PM , Rating: 2
Actually in the early days of the UFC there was no rule against groin strikes. Joe Son lost a fight to Keith Hackney at UFC 4 after submitting to repeated strikes to the cock and balls

The worst example of that, though was Gary Goodridge versus Pedro Otavio in the Vale Tudo tournament in Brazil.

It's kinda long, but kinda hilariously horrible. Goodridge not only uses the ball grab as an offensive attack, but he also puts his feet down the guy's shorts while wrestling for position on the ground... not cool.

I think they nicknamed the first round of no-groin strike rules the "Gary Goodridge rule" because of this.

By Desslok on 7/27/10, Rating: -1
By Desslok on 7/27/10, Rating: -1
By conorvansmack on 7/27/2010 1:55:55 PM , Rating: 1
Read carefully. Vale Tudo Brazil is a completely different promotion with a completely different set of rules.

By Desslok on 7/27/2010 3:26:41 PM , Rating: 1
I suggest you take your own advice.

In the early days of the UFC there were NO rules against blows to the groin.

By HoosierEngineer5 on 7/27/2010 3:46:31 PM , Rating: 2
Personal opinion only, but I believe the people who downloaded this for free barely got their money's worth.

By derricker on 7/27/2010 4:15:37 PM , Rating: 2
Which would make perfect sense in that, it is only those companies putting out subpar products who are trying to go after people's money in courts. What a jewel, they don't rightfully earn it so they'd rather steal it from people in courts.

Dana "drama queen" White is just a bunch of yip yap, this whole thing is what he does best, screaming pathetic drama scenarios right and left

At best they will be "settling" with 500 John Does, that is, using scare tactics.

"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki