backtop


Print 59 comment(s) - last by erple2.. on Aug 1 at 6:57 PM


Apple iMac family

Apple Magic Trackpad
Apple continues to overhaul its product portfolio

Apple had a blockbuster Q3 thanks to strong sales of its iPhone, iPads, and Mac computers. The Cupertino, California-based company was able to reel in revenue and profits of $15.7 billion and $3.25 billion respectively.

Apple is looking to keep its winning streak alive with a few updated products. Today saw updates to the iMac and Mac Pro product families along with a new Bluetooth-based accessory.

The new iMac family is still available in 21.5" and 27" screen sizes, but firepower for the entire line has been increased. The Core 2 Duo processors have been ditched on the base configurations in favor of dual-core Intel Core i3 processors.

21.5" iMacs start out with an Intel Core i3 processor running at 3.06GHz and can be optioned with a Core i5 processor running at 3.6GHz. The 27" iMacs start out with a 3.2GHz Core i3 processor and top out at a quad-core Core i7 running at 2.93GHz.

ATI graphics solutions blanket the iMac family with low-end machines getting a 256MB Radeon HD 4670 and top-ranging 27" iMacs receiving a 1GB Radeon HD 5750.

“We took the world’s best all-in-one and made it even better,” said Philip Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. “With the latest processors, high-performance graphics and signature aluminum and glass design, customers are going to love the latest iMac.”

The new iMacs start at $1,199 for the 21.5" model and $1,699 for the 27" model.

To complement Apple's new iMacs, a new Magic Trackpad accessory has been announced. This Bluetooth-based accessory operates exactly like the trackpad found on MacBook, MacBook Air, and MacBook Pro notebooks. It retails for $69.

Also seeing an update after a long, stagnant period is Apple's Mac Pro. The Mac Pro is now available with quad- and six-core Intel Xeon processors running at 3.33GHz. When equipped with two processors, Apple's newest Mac Pros boast up to 12 physical cores and up to 24 virtual cores with Hyper-Threading.

“The new Mac Pro is the most powerful and configurable Mac we’ve ever made,” said Schiller added. “With up to 12 cores, the new Mac Pro outperforms our previous top-of-the-line system by up to 50 percent, and with over a billion possible configurations, our customers can create exactly the system they want.”

The default graphics card on the new Mac Pros is now an ATI Radeon HD 5770 while a Radeon HD 5870 is optional. Another option that will surely set you back a pretty penny is a quad-512MB SSD array.

The new Mac Pros start at $2,499.

One final addition to Apple's new product onslaught is the new 27" Cinema Display. This beauty packs a screen resolution of 2560x1440, an iSight camera, MagSafe connector for your MacBook, and a three-port USB hub. Naturally, all of this doesn't come cheap -- the new display retails for $999.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/27/2010 10:08:29 AM , Rating: 4
Because of multitouch


RE: Why?
By retrospooty on 7/27/2010 10:17:07 AM , Rating: 3
you know, multitouch was a great thing in a phone that had no mouse so that you can do alot more functions with ease. Great stuff... but its useless in a desktop device with a mouse. Anything you can do with a multitouch pad, can be done better, easier and cheaper with a mouse.


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/27/10, Rating: 0
RE: Why?
By ClownPuncher on 7/27/2010 11:28:27 AM , Rating: 2
Outside of a very small handful of apps, why would you need to?


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/27/2010 11:35:16 AM , Rating: 2
The OS X itself uses multitouch extensively, plus small handful is going to expand inevitably


RE: Why?
By StevoLincolnite on 7/27/2010 2:39:17 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The OS X itself uses multitouch extensively, plus small handful is going to expand inevitably


I have a 24" Dell touch screen on my system.

Generally... Touch devices cannot replace the mouse, the mouse is more precise and faster, and considering some people are capable of upwards of 200+ actions a Minuit with a keyboard+mouse... Good luck on a touch device being able to match it.

On a desktop, mouse gestures are cool, Windows 7 uses them and I would find it hard going without them now.
Touch screens and touch pads just don't seem to cut it as they are slow and clunky in comparison.


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/27/2010 2:45:59 PM , Rating: 1
If your Dell touchscreen is slow and clunky - doesn't mean Mac touchpad is the same.


RE: Why?
By StevoLincolnite on 7/27/2010 3:47:04 PM , Rating: 2
I wasn't referring to the technology itself, the monitors touch is incredibly responsive (It registers touch before you even touch the surface of the screen).
It's navigating the OS and programs with touch that is slow and clunky, as you have to move your hand allot farther on a screen than what you would with a mouse.


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/29/2010 12:14:02 PM , Rating: 2
If you noticed the difference in size/area between a touchpad and a screen - you wouldn't be Stevo to begin with :))) har har har


RE: Why?
By jvillaro on 7/27/2010 11:04:46 PM , Rating: 2
You must must really be Steve's bastard offspring...


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/29/2010 12:06:49 PM , Rating: 2
And you came out of Ballmer's enuz, brown and slimy.


RE: Why?
By omnicronx on 7/27/2010 11:53:15 AM , Rating: 3
And what exactly do these 3, 4 finger gestures map to in many situations? Replace functionality that takes less effort on a mouse.

For example: 3-Finger Swipe Left/Right = Go Back/Forward in Folder History in the Finder.. So we are replacing 1 quick mouse click and perhaps hovering over a button (i.e barely moving your hand), to swiping 3 fingers and moving your hand dramatically..

Right click is another, you still have to scroll to the position you want, then you have to use two fingers instead of one.

Once again, aside from the 'cool' factor, do these kind of gestures really make things easier on a desktop?

Don't get me wrong, I use gestures here and there (zooming and scrolling for example makes perfect sense), but I never really understood things like 3/4 finger gestures on a desktop, and to claim that gestures can replace a mouse without being less efficient in the majority of situations is a pipe dream in my opinion.


RE: Why?
By headbox on 7/27/10, Rating: 0
RE: Why?
By omnicronx on 7/27/2010 12:33:50 PM , Rating: 2
Thanks for your little rant (that for the record made your sound like a child).

My point still stands, look at what those gestures map too and how many fingers/movesments you have to perform said gestures.

Using your little ALT Tab as an example; do you not keep at least one hand on or very close to your keyboard when on a desktop? If not thats your preference, but the fact remains many people do, my left hand is always on the keyboard. So are you actually going to imply its easier to swipe 4 fingers (i don't care how you do it, whether its dramatic or not) than pressing two buttons where my hand is alreay lying?

With a laptop then by all means it makes perfect sense, i rest my hands on the trackpad and only move up to the keyboard to type (not too sure about others), but once again, on a desktop to make the claim that it is more efficient just does not make sense to me.

Gestures make sense in many situations, but they also make little sense in many others. So to completely get rid of a mouse for a trackpad on a desktop makes little sense to me. Seems a mix of both would be the best solution.


RE: Why?
By afkrotch on 7/27/2010 10:49:07 PM , Rating: 2
Depending on the program used (as Windows users have a wider variety of programs that aren't made by Apple) for zoom. You can use the scroll wheel to zoom in/out. In IE, you can press ctrl+scroll wheel to zoom in/out.

I use ACDSee, where I just the scroll wheel lets me move to next image. I can hold ctrl+scroll wheel to zoom in/out. I use a side button to rotate image.

My mouse has left click, right click, scroll wheel, scroll wheel click, 3 buttons to change dpi, quick launch button, and also records macros. It has a screen to display dpi, has feet that you can change, also adjust the weight.
Hell, I can set my mouse to automatically sort through a folder of images, resize them all, and save them.

WTF is a trackpad that cost more going to do for me?


RE: Why?
By jvillaro on 7/27/2010 11:07:56 PM , Rating: 2
Well maybe we'll wait for something like Kinect for PC's and not something that turns my Desktop into a notebook


RE: Why?
By retrospooty on 7/28/2010 8:26:53 AM , Rating: 2
"How would you do two, three and four finger gestures with a mouse? "

What 3,4 finger gesture would you need to do if you had a mouse? Not a crappy 2 button Apple mouse, but lets picture a real mouse with a wheel and more buttons.

Those mouse gestures are great on a phone, and were designed around a lacking mouse or no mouse.


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/29/2010 12:22:43 PM , Rating: 2
Play with multifinger 2D swipes in OS X and then you'll understand.


RE: Why?
By retrospooty on 7/29/2010 1:17:32 PM , Rating: 2
I dumped my laptop that has OSX on it so I cant, but I'd really much rather use my g500

http://www.logitech.com/en-us/gaming/mice-keyboard...

11 fully programmable buttons including the left and right scroll. Programmable to do diff. functions in diff. apps and games as well... All accessible by barely lifting a finger ;)


RE: Why?
By Pirks on 7/29/2010 3:24:35 PM , Rating: 2
if only all the pc mice were like yours


RE: Why?
By retrospooty on 7/30/2010 12:04:38 PM , Rating: 2
many are. It's not like a rare product.

There are certainly alot more programmable mice out there than there are trackpads.


RE: Why?
By LifeByTheHorns on 7/27/2010 11:14:44 AM , Rating: 1
I personally prefer the trackpad on my MBP to a multi-button mouse for everything except drawing/painting. Once I got used to the gestures, they were much more comfortable and productive than a mouse.

I never thought that would be possible.


RE: Why?
By Suntan on 7/27/2010 12:47:12 PM , Rating: 2
I would agree.

I knew this pad thing would bring out a lot of ire among people that hate Apple. But it isn't *that* bad. Yeah, its expensive and kinda silly to be battery powered just so it can be wireless, but it gives a person an alternative if they would rather use a trackpad than a mouse.

Personally, I wouldn't buy one, but it isn't the most offensive thing Apple has tried to cram down customer's throats.

-Suntan


RE: Why?
By captainBOB on 7/27/2010 5:45:55 PM , Rating: 2
IDK why people are getting PO'd over a silly trackpad...

Still like Suntan said it isn't the worst thing Apple has tried to "force" on customers.

Remember those candy colored tower iMacs? Remember that mouse that was shaped like a hockey puck? Yeah, worst idea ever, and that WAS forced upon customers.


RE: Why?
By afkrotch on 7/27/2010 10:52:15 PM , Rating: 2
You mean the ugly colorful iMac all-in-one or the Mac G4s? iMac has never been a tower.


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki