Print 112 comment(s) - last by n0ebert.. on Aug 2 at 11:59 AM

Over 10 million expected to sell this year

The original StarCraft real-time strategy game was released twelve years ago, and went on to revolutionize computer gaming. The use of three distinct races with their own unique units and gaming strategies led to an explosion in LAN gaming, especially in South Korea. Over eleven million copies of the games have been sold, with millions more illegally copied. A dozen novels centered on the game universe have been written, and it is still one of the most popular in the world.

StarCraft is particularly popular in South Korea, where professional players and teams earn sponsorships and prize money through competition in televised tournaments. Over 10% of the country's population of nearly 49 million still actively plays the game.

Blizzard Entertainment hopes to recapture that success with today's launch of StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty, the long anticipated sequel to the original masterpiece. Development on the sequel started in 2003, but had been stalled due to the resources needed for the World of Warcraft MMO. The company eventually decided to split the game up into three parts: Wings of Liberty, Heart of the Swarm, and Legacy of the Void.

Wings of Liberty follows protagonist Jim Raynor as he leads an insurgent group against the Terran Dominion following the events of StarCraft and the StarCraft: Brood War expansion pack. The non-linear single-player campaign has the player taking on mercenary jobs for money in order to buy additional units and upgrades. There are key missions that will appear to explore the storyline and keep it linear.

The expansion packs will feature Zerg and Protoss single-player campaigns to complete the storyline, as well as additional unit and multiplayer maps. Full multiplayer gameplay with all three races is available out of the box.

Graphics are of course much improved over the DirectX 2.0 standard of the original. Unfortunately, the drawn out development process meant that the game was targeted for DirectX 9.0c, and lack the features of DX 10, 10.1, and DirectX 11. While the game looks good, it doesn't look as good as it could be.

The game is still capable of challenging graphics cards, especially at higher resolutions like 1920x1200 and 2560x1600. ATI Eyefinity multi-monitor technology is supported, and players fortunate enough to have a Radeon 5870 HD Eyefinity Edition can game with up to six monitors.

Heavy use of the Havok Physics engine and ability to use more units also means that the game is more likely to be CPU limited. Although StarCraft 2 is not multi-core optimized, players will still see a boost from using dual- and quad-core systems.

The original StarCraft game made heavy use of LAN gaming as internet usage was not prevalent or fast at the time of its release. Broadband internet access is now readily available, so Blizzard has made the decision to remove LAN gaming support. Gamers will be required to connect through Blizzard's servers in an attempt to crack down on piracy.

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is available for sale in retail standard and collector's editions, as well as for digital download directly from Blizzard. MSRP for the standard edition is $60, while the collector's edition sells for $100. It includes a 176-page hardcover art book, a 2GB dog tag USB flash drive containing copies of the original StarCraft and Brood War expansion, a soundtrack CD, and a DVD with interviews and additional cutscenes.

In an unusual marketing move, Blizzard announced that South Korean players would be able to play StarCraft II for free as long as their World of Warcraft subscriptions are active. Retailer K-Mart is currently offering a $20 gaming coupon on in-store purchases of the game through the end of the month.


Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I was all smiles till..
By Taft12 on 7/29/2010 10:35:31 AM , Rating: 3
You can calling illegal copying theft all you like, it will never make it true. The infinite number of copies producible at ~$0 is the difference.

You seem to be unfamiliar with open-source software and the GPL which is where the "free as in speech" expression comes from (and the BSD license which is "free as in beer"). Might I suggest you broaden your horizons given the profession you are in?

RE: I was all smiles till..
By raelalt on 7/29/2010 12:13:55 PM , Rating: 2
No it is you that is obviously unfamiliar with the GPL. It only applies to those software developers that sign their projects onto it.

RE: I was all smiles till..
By Taft12 on 7/30/2010 11:27:54 PM , Rating: 2
Having written GPL software myself, I am intimately familiar with it.

Watch your terminology, please - the license doesn't apply to software developers, only code (developers must follow the terms, of course)

RE: I was all smiles till..
By Sunner on 7/30/2010 9:48:13 AM , Rating: 2
Obviously you are the one who are unfamiliar with open source, given your faulty description of the two most common OSS licenses.
Also, people who actually contribute to open source tend to be far more respectful of others rights to their property than people who merely want to use open source because it's free as in beer. You certainly seem to belong to the latter, you neither understand the ideals behind open source, nor do you respect others right to keep their software closed if they so choose, all you want is a free lunch.
Go away, neither camp wants you.

RE: I was all smiles till..
By Taft12 on 7/30/2010 11:25:18 PM , Rating: 2
Oh I am very respectful of property rights, which is why I am very particular about not applying the word "theft" or "steal" to illegal copying. I already pointed out the difference which you surely understand as well. You might have me pegged as a purveyor of illegally copied software which couldn't be further from the truth.

Indeed I do contribute to GPL projects and am quick to point out there "nothing is free" is completely false and that there IS such a thing as a free lunch! Unfortunately, you may also know as I do that these opinions don't go over well on this site.

I'm not sure where you think my description is faulty - "free as in speech" and "free as in beer" are the most common layman's way I know of that describe those two open-source licenses and I've heard them in conversation hundreds of times in person and online... Where is my mistake?

"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki