Print 131 comment(s) - last by goku.. on Jul 30 at 7:03 AM

Chevy Volt
GM's shining star finally get an official price

The Chevrolet Volt is undeniably the most high profile project going on at General Motors these days. The vehicle was first unveiled as a concept back at the Detroit Auto Show in January of 2007 and since that time has gone through a long gestation period.

The production version of the Volt is unrecognizable from the original concept that debuted in 2007, but its mission remains the same: to provide 40 miles of electric-only propulsion and an additional 300 miles when the 1.4-liter gasoline engine/generator kicks in.

Today, GM has announced official pricing for its Chevy Cruze-based vehicle. The vehicle will be priced at $41,000 ($33,500 net of full federal income tax credit). Fully loaded, the vehicle will run you $44,600 before the tax credit. It will also be available for a 36-month lease ($350 per month with $2,500 due at lease signing).

“The Chevrolet Volt will be the best vehicle in its class… because it’s in a class by itself,” said Joel Ewanick, vice president of U.S. marketing for General Motors. “No other automaker offers an electrically driven vehicle that can be your everyday driver, to take you wherever, whenever. The Volt will be packed with premium content and innovation, standard.”

When it comes to “mainstream” electric vehicles, the pricing of the Volt puts it a few pegs above Nissan’s Leaf electric vehicle (EV). The Nissan Leaf has a base MSRP of $32,780 before the $7,500 federal tax credit for EVs. Depending on what state customers live in, the final price of the Leaf can drop down to around $20,000 after local and state tax incentives.

According to GM's Online Order/Reference Guide, the Volt rides on a 105.7" wheelbase and measures 177.1" x 70.4" x 56.6" (L x W x H). Cargo capacity for the vehicle is listed at 10.6 cubic feet. Standard features for the Volt include a GPS navigation system (7" display), 30GB hard drive for audio storage, XM Radio/XM NavTraffic, OnStar, Vehicle Connectivity, and Bluetooth.

The Volt's 1.4-liter engine/generator also inexplicably requires premium fuel to operate. The gasoline generator is rated at 80 hp while the electric motor is rated at 74 hp and 273 lb-ft of torque. Total rated system power is 150 hp according to GM. The Volt's battery pack will come with an 8-year/100,000 warranty.

According to Green Car Advisor, the Chevy Volt can accelerate to 60 mph in about nine seconds. Top speed for the vehicle will be 100 mph.

When it comes to charging the vehicle, GM had this to say:

While the Chevrolet Volt will come standard with a 120-volt charge cord that will provide owners with the ability to charge their Volt directly from a standard home electrical outlet, a total of 4,400 Volt buyers in launch markets could be eligible for a free 240-volt charging station, including home installation.  The installations are part of a program developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to install approximately 15,000 240-volt home charging stations across the U.S.

The Chevy Volt will be available in Silver Ice Metallic, Black, Crystal Red Metallic Tint,
White Diamond Tricoat, Cyber Gray Metallic, and Viridian Joule Tricoat.

Although customer-ready production models of the first generation Chevy Volt have yet to hit U.S. streets, GM is already brainstorming about changes it will make to the second generation model. The current Volt uses an off-the-shelf engine that it shares with the Chevy Cruze. Such a large and complex motor that is merely serving as a generator is both wasteful and expensive. GM instead wants to look at other options such as a smaller two-cylinder gasoline engine, rotary engine, or a small displacement diesel engine.

The Volt will also get a larger sibling in the form of the Volt MPV5. The Volt MPV5 trades the rather restrictive 4-passenger sedan configuration of the standard model for a crossover configuration that seats five and offers a more generous cargo area (62 cubic feet with the rear seats down). Due to the more compromised aerodynamics and heavier body, the Volt MPV5 can achieve a battery-only range of 32 miles instead of the Volt’s 40 miles.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 50 grand..
By The0ne on 7/27/2010 12:46:53 PM , Rating: 0
I say more, but I've yet to stop LMAO. Seriously, 41K HAHAHA

Different class but I got my EVO 10 for 36K OTD, and this thing is 41K? There is seriously something wrong here.

RE: 50 grand..
By Reclaimer77 on 7/27/2010 12:52:14 PM , Rating: 4
Well I could almost understand it if they had to recoup the costs of R&D to develop the Volt with each sale. But the taxpayer already absorbed that cost. So what's the deal with that sticker price?

The National Gas Average price is $2.74 a gallon right now. Less in my area. But think about how much gas you could buy with 10 or more grand. Then tell me how the Volt, priced at 41k+, is saving you money on gas?

RE: 50 grand..
By theapparition on 7/27/2010 12:55:58 PM , Rating: 3
Depending on your driving habits, the Volt can save you close to $2000/yr on fuel over your Lancer (based on 15k miles per year).

Over 5 years that means the TCO of your Lancer will be $48,500 (36k + 5 x 2500). The Volt will be $36,000 (41k - 7500 + 5 x 500).

I'm not suggesting the Volt is great, or for everyone for that matter. Just that you are trying to compare two completely different cars to skew your argument.

The real punchline here is that you actually paid $36K for a frickin turbo'd Lancer.

RE: 50 grand..
By Reclaimer77 on 7/27/10, Rating: -1
RE: 50 grand..
By theapparition on 7/27/2010 1:31:35 PM , Rating: 3
I eat them on tracks monthly, and yes I have driven them. I have a lot of respect for the performance that they get out of them, but let's face it, they are Lancers that have an obscene turbo'd engine but not much else.

If GM stripped a base model car and put a 300hp engine in there, the internet would be all over about how Government Motors can't innovate and what a POS it is. But the Japeneese do it and it's such an innovation.

RE: 50 grand..
By Reclaimer77 on 7/27/10, Rating: -1
RE: 50 grand..
By cruisin3style on 7/27/2010 4:32:08 PM , Rating: 1
Showing how little you know: GM had the Cobalt SS up until MY 2008 or so and it is pretty much what you described (a base model front wheel drive car with a turbo charged engine) and from what I saw (I briefly thought about buying one) it got rave reviews.

RE: 50 grand..
By Reclaimer77 on 7/27/2010 6:48:28 PM , Rating: 2
What about the Neon SRT-4?? Same deal. Hell the Buick Grand National is one of the hottest collector cars to this day, and by his definition is just another "turbo'd" Buick. I mean, he's just so thick.

He just comes off as some bitter or stubborn American V-8 guy to me. Claiming some kind of pro-Japanese bias while at the same time ignoring all relevant American examples to the contrary.

RE: 50 grand..
By theapparition on 7/27/2010 1:41:34 PM , Rating: 4
Don't you think you're being just *slightly* best-case in favor of the Volt?

I stated depending on driving habits. You could certainly not see those savings, but it will always be signifigantly less cost than the Lancer, even if fully on gas engine.

You aren't "saving" anything when you start at a MUCH higher initial buy-in. Total value needs to be assessed, not just gas savings

But you don't start at a higher buy-in. 41K (for most the base options are quite sufficient) less the hated tax credit starts you at 33.5K. Fully optioned out starts you at 37k, same ballpark as the Lancer mentioned earlier.

Sorry but it doesn't work that way in real life.

And why not. For most, it is entirely possible they won't use any gas at all for normal commuting. Please enlighten me on how my numbers don't work in real life. And be specific.

If you commute more than 40miles a day, then the Volt may not be for you (or maybe it still will be since it gets very good mileage even with the gas engine).

RE: 50 grand..
By hyvonen on 7/27/2010 2:18:54 PM , Rating: 2
The real punchline here is that you actually paid $36K for a frickin turbo'd Lancer.


Yeah, no kidding

RE: 50 grand..
By kfonda on 7/27/2010 2:47:32 PM , Rating: 3
Depending on your driving habits, the Volt can save you close to $2000/yr on fuel over your Lancer (based on 15k miles per year).

Does that include the cost of electricity to charge the Volt?

RE: 50 grand..
By clovell on 7/27/2010 3:22:30 PM , Rating: 2
Driving Habits... and the price of electricity, and the money saved on interest paid or earned on the $$-delta.

Still - I like the punchline.

RE: 50 grand..
By Shadowmaster625 on 7/27/10, Rating: 0
RE: 50 grand..
By kfonda on 7/27/10, Rating: 0
RE: 50 grand..
By The0ne on 7/28/2010 11:09:57 AM , Rating: 2
Yea, damn me and my rally cars. What was I thinking! Urgh, I need to get something that goes fast on straights and has absolutely no racing history to back it up! Hell, my rally cars are all cheap cars with turbo's attached like you said, nothing special. Hey, I'm a car noob, but I'll stick with my rally cars.

I just pray Tommi isn't on this pathetic blog reading idiotic threads, he'll be dead from extreme laughter.

RE: 50 grand..
By The0ne on 7/28/2010 12:34:41 PM , Rating: 2
So here is a bit of history on my pathetic rally car choices. Please forgive this dumb fck of a vehicle owner, I'm so noobish.

And here's the poor slob that drove those crummy "lancers."

So as you can see, I totally blew it when I decided on them rally cars because what I should have done was bought cars that were fast in a straight from 0-60. Gosh darnit! Urgh, makes me so mad! Forget that I love driving on country roads, mountain roads and valleys...which have little to no straights.

Can some knowledgeable person here advise me on my next vehicle purchase. Please list all cars you think I need to go in a straight line. OBVIOUSLY, I'm too fcking dumb as I'm sticking with rally breed cars. Maybe I can just buy a small old civic, gut it out, turbo it and run a few nice times on the straights. Oh wait, then I be consider a rice boy eh? LMAO.

Yea, the real punchline it surely is LMAO


RE: 50 grand..
By Reclaimer77 on 7/28/2010 8:43:13 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah he's just ignorant. The simple fact of the matter is, for the money, the amount of value and performance packed into the Evo, STI, and similar vehicles are astounding. Those "rally" cars are awesome.

Also notice he laughs at your vehicle choice, and makes several degrading comments about your "Lancer", but never says what he's driving. Makes you wonder, eh?

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki