backtop


Print 67 comment(s) - last by delphinus100.. on Jul 24 at 11:14 PM


An artist rendering of the upcoming Crew Space Transportation CST-100 spacecraft  (Source: Boeing)

Cutaway view of the CST-100 capsule  (Source: Boeing)

  (Source: Boeing)
Craft is expected to offer commercial service in the place of the retired Space Shuttle

Boeing recently received a lot of press for the X-37B, a spacecraft it designed for NASA that has been passed off to the U.S. Air Force and further refined into a fully operational vehicle.  It turns out that was certainly not the only spacecraft the company is cooking up.

Under a $18M USD contract with NASA Boeing is building a capsule craft called the Crew Space Transportation (CST)-100.  The craft can hold up to seven crew members.  It simplifies matters by reusing existing components and architecture from past capsule designs -- meaning that NASA will likely save on repair costs.

Size wise, the craft is bigger than an Apollo program capsule, but smaller than the planned Orion spacecraft which is NASA's official shuttle replacement.  It can launch aboard a variety of rockets, including the Atlas, Falcon, and Delta designs.

The plan will be to use the craft to ferry passengers and supplies to and from the International Space Station.  The craft will also likely service future upcoming commercial space stations, including those of Bigelow Aerospace Orbital Space Complex.  Bigelow is designing high-strength inflatable space stations which it plans to use in a commercial space hotel venture.

Competition in the field is tight, so Boeing has its work cut out for it.  In February, NASA gave $50M USD to Blue Origin, Boeing, Paragon Space Development Corporation, Sierra Nevada Corporation and United Launch Alliance to develop craft that could ferry passengers or freight to the ISS.  And while they have not officially tossed their hats in the ring, Virgin Galactic, makers of the space tourism craft SpaceShip One, and SpaceX, makers of the Falcon 9 launch vehicle both could design passenger craft to service the station at some point.

Ultimately, Boeing seems to be going for the right approach -- mixing affordability with an adequate design and flexibility.  How the design works out, though, remains to be seen.  Ultimately the results will prove a part of the critical test of whether President Obama's plans to denationalize the U.S space industry are feasible.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: There was a time...
By Phoque on 7/24/2010 3:04:34 PM , Rating: 2
You know, there are a lot of civilizations which were once great. None ever stayed at the top. US may have been ( still be ), at the top, but that's something that can't resist the test of time. You can blame it on the Democrats, you can blame it on the Republican, "you" always blame it on the politicians, but I think the problem is more fundamentally with human nature, but then, I am no anthropologist ( just an avid Howard Bloom reader ).

Also, maybe the US should continue and put more emphasis on international space cooperation. It seems to me to be such a wisest approach to just sit on US great space history and weine about the current situation. Not saying US should abandon Nasa. But why the US would'nt take the lead on building an international space shuttle in cooperation with Russia, China, Japan, ...? Technology secrets you say? Yes, I guess it's a good point for some people. It doesn't seem so obvious to me, though I'm not saying it is a bad point. While the US are still the leader, perhaps they should change the mentality, because no, they won't stay at the top forever. And it will only hurt more if they are left behind, alone, with their decaying pride.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki