backtop


Print 84 comment(s) - last by knutjb.. on Jul 24 at 3:52 PM


Raytheon's test of its laser weapons tracking system was a resounding success, scoring 4 UAV kills.  (Source: Raytheon)

Raytheon has released video of the test.  (Source: Raytheon)

The new laser version of Raytheon's Phalanx tracking system could be used to counter UAVs from hostile nations such as Iran (U.S. armed "Reaper" UAV pictured).  (Source: The Real Revo)
Company shows off video of lasers shooting down a drone

Even as the Northrop Grumman tests out its new 100 KW solid state laser cannon as part of a $98M USD Maritime Laser Demonstration program with the U.S. Navy to defend against ships, Raytheon is offering a new guidance system that may be capable of aiming laser batteries against airborne targets.

In May, the U.S. Navy coupled six solid-state lasers with an output of 32 kilowatts (the Navy's Laser Weapon System, LaWS) to Raytheon's Phalanx Close-In Weapon System sensors.  The result was successful kills of four unmanned aerial vehicles.

Raytheon is showing grainy black and white video of test for the first time at the U.K.'sFarnborough International Air Show 2010.

The tests were conducted near the Navy's weapons and training facility on San Nicolas Island in California's Santa Barbara Channel.  Phalanx used radio-frequency (radar) sensors and electro-optical tracking to direct the laser's aim on targets.

The results were impressive and easily surpassed Raytheon's 2006 destruction of a static mortar shell, and 2008 destruction of an incoming (in motion) mortar shell over land.  Still, Mike Booen, vice president of Raytheon's Advanced Security and Directed Energy Systems product line insists that the successful tests are only the start and that the full system will not be finalized until 2016, at the earliest.

Interestingly, the Phalanx system is nothing new.  It has typically been coupled, though with traditional munition based weapons, such as the 20-mm Gatling gun.  The laser-equipped system would likely more than double the range of the traditional Gatling gun.

The laser anti-aircraft batteries could be useful to counter hostile nations like Iran that have reportedly developed UAV capabilities.  Coupled with the Maritime Laser Demonstration (MLD) cannons, they could offer an unprecedented warship.  States Northrop spokesman Bob Bishop, "The MLD system we are under contract to build for [the U.S. Office of Naval Research] will be scalable to a variety of power levels.  That means that laser power can be added—or subtracted—to meet the level of response necessary to address the threat, all within the same modular laser weapon system."

The MLD program will complete its tests by the end of year.  The tests will be performed at 15 KW -- a mere fraction of the laser's full power.  If all goes well, Northrop Grumman may be able to test shots at higher power levels, afterwards.

Both the U.S. Army and the Air Force are also currently evaluating and testing laser weapons.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By amanojaku on 7/21/2010 8:53:05 AM , Rating: 2
Iran is a hostile nation, and it's hostility began in 1979 with the Iranian Revolution. Read up on the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini; he started all the mess. Iran is pretty much at odds with everyone, including Muslim countries. It just doesn't have the military might to start a fight and win.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayatollah_Khomeini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By hubbabubbagum on 7/21/10, Rating: -1
RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By NanoTube1 on 7/21/2010 9:20:54 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah right.

Furthermore, Iran never launched any terror campaign against the US. Al Aqsa brigades ring a bell? Mahdi army anyone? Taking US citizens hostage for 444 days? Arming Hizballah (the same guys that blew the Marines barracks in lebanon)?

I can go on and on. The only reason why they are not openly attacking the US is that they do not have the military might.


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By Kurz on 7/21/10, Rating: 0
By Anoxanmore on 7/21/2010 10:18:03 AM , Rating: 2
After you slept with her first. :)

You forgot that part.


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By bug77 on 7/21/2010 10:44:48 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Well... they wouldn't need to wage a terror campaign if we didn't meddle in their country.


And you came to that conclusion how? By their own words, they won't rest until the whole world bows to islam and all infidels are history. American/jewish/whoever presence in the Middle East is just the pretext of the day.


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By TerranMagistrate on 7/21/2010 11:05:57 AM , Rating: 3
Ignorance probably.

How else does one ignore the basic fact that the Iranian regime is an fanatical Islamic theocracy with some rather ominous Islamic aspirations for the West. Their nuclear program being just one of several means to that end.


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By MojoMan on 7/21/2010 2:14:33 PM , Rating: 2
Be careful who you call ignorant. Nobody is saying they aren't a hostile regime. However... Study the term blow back. What we are saying is we're simply giving them a reason to fight us. Even for religious reasons it is historically hard to get people to get up and go fight a war, especially against a far off country. As soon as you start messing with people's home turf though... All of the sudden that validates their religious leanings, and it becomes a rallying cry. Imagine someone invading our country "preemptively." Your reaction is to protect your home, your family, and your country. Oh... When you do defend yourself, or counter-attack, the world will look at you can go, see? We needed to attack. Look how hostile they are!

Lol...

I see some of you, at least, do your own reading instead of believing everything the government and media tells you.


By gamerk2 on 7/21/2010 3:14:19 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. Religion is nothing more then an excuse by a nations leaders to garner natonalistic support.

The saddest part of Iran is a majority of people have a positive view of the US, but the US keeps acting like the reverse is true.


By afkrotch on 7/21/2010 10:37:00 PM , Rating: 1
The problem is, we will be damned if we do and damned if we don't. Somalia is a prime example. There to help, we get fucked. Leave and never help again, we get fucked for not helping.


By MatthiasF on 7/21/2010 9:29:32 AM , Rating: 3
What democracy? The Shah was a MONARCH! The country was more like a dictatorship, no democracy involved at all.

Much like most of the rest of the region.


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By amanojaku on 7/21/2010 9:57:06 AM , Rating: 5
I know you're not serious, because that made no sense at all. But I'll play along...

The revolution happened for several reasons, none of which had anything to do with furthering Iranian democracy. In fact, the end result was a return to theocracy, where religion rules the state. The Iranian people were AGAINST the idea of Westernizing, which meant treating women as equals (many women supported equal rights, many men didn't), giving religious minorities the ability to hold office, and reducing the power of religious groups.

The Ayatollah managed to rally conservatives to his cause and they ousted the progressive, but arrogant and sometimes incompetent, Shah Pahlavi. Immediately afterward the economy collapsed, there was social unrest, and all the democratic groups (such as the National Democratic Front) were destroyed. Iran pretends to be a democracy, but you'll notice that it dictates more than it listens. Ahmadinejad calls himself a president, but Iran is really run by the Supreme Leader.

Iran is still intolerant: women still do not have equal rights, religious minorities are still treated as inferior, and the religious majority has a say in everything.


By alphadog on 7/21/2010 12:38:27 PM , Rating: 1
> The Ayatollah managed to rally conservatives to his cause

Apparently not the conservatives in the US. Can't all conservatives just get along?!? :)


By inperfectdarkness on 7/21/2010 1:19:03 PM , Rating: 4
i'm glad someone else on here actually understands the real truth behind iran's history.

additionally, iran has been a LONG-TIME supporter of terrorist organizations (hamas, hezbollah, etc). that alone should cause any democracy-lover to question the validity of the iranian state under its current government.

apparently there are a lot of people on daily-tech who forget that until the revolution, iran was a key ally of the USA in the middle-east. there's a reason they got F-14's from us.


RE: "...hostile nations such as Iran..."
By gamerk2 on 7/21/2010 3:23:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Iran is still intolerant: women still do not have equal rights, religious minorities are still treated as inferior, and the religious majority has a say in everything.


Funny, this sentence equally describes Isriel; are you arguing they are an intolerant nation as well?

quote:
The revolution happened for several reasons, none of which had anything to do with furthering Iranian democracy.


Wrong again; The Primary reason for the revolution was to rid the country of the US backed Shah, who was little more then a brutal dictator that had US backing because he was anti-communist. The religious undertones didn't appear until after the revolution ended, when conservatives in Iran created the Supreme Leader position. [Its important to note decisions by the SL can technically be voted, as the origional attempt was to create a form of democracy where religion would have an equal place with law, ironically simmilar to Isriel. As you can see, however, conservatives ended up with more power, and the country veered far to the right.]


By ekv on 7/21/2010 9:05:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Funny, this sentence equally describes Isriel; are you arguing they are an intolerant nation as well?
I disagree. Since when did Israel invoke a news black-out for the entire country? at a time when political dissidents were being lured to demonstrations, then attacked by state police and in some cases murdered.

No, I think the question is, are you arguing that Israel is an intolerant nation? Btw, are you deliberately mis-spelling "Israel"?


By gamerk2 on 7/21/2010 3:18:03 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Read up on the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini; he started all the mess.


Read up on the Shah of Iran and his brutal dicatorship; he was the root cause of the Iranian Revolution. Hence why backing dictators never works.

Look at Irans point of view: The west took land that belong to islamic states to create Isriel, backed several brutal dictators in the region (The Shah of Iran, Saddam, the Saudi Kings, etc), and then expanded their War on Terror to Iraq under false pretenses. Throw in about 1,000 years of Religious undertones, and you make it easy to cause radical elements to rise up and sieze control.


"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki