Print 16 comment(s) - last by rcc.. on Jul 23 at 6:39 PM

Response to government adds more details about when Apple plans to snoop on its customers

Following a letter sent to Apple CEO Steven Jobs expressing concerns about Apple's plan to track its users' locations, Reps. Joe Barton (R-Texas) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) have at last received a response from Cupertino.  Penned by Bruce Sewell, general counsel for Apple, the response elucidates the company's plans in much more detail.

In the letter Sewell says that forcing users to agree to the new terms (language concerning the tracking was included in an iTunes update, which was uninstallable if you did not click to agree) was merely to help inform users of the change. 

He said any user can turn off location-aware services, which are found on iPhones and iPads running iPhone OS 4.0.  Though he does not explicitly state it, these services appear to be enabled by default on new iOS 4.0 devices.  A small icon on the services bar shows customers that location services are running.

Customers also have the option to permanently opt out of tracking at  Despite ambiguity in the contract language, Sewell indicates that Apple will respect customers' wishes and not track them if they turn off location services in the OS or sign up at the opt-out page.

For users who intentionally or unintentionally do allow Apple to "collect, use and share precise location data, including real-time geographic location", Sewell assures them that the data will only be kept for 6 months.  All data submitted to third parties will be made anonymous, as well.

The company writes, "Apple does not share any interest-based or location-based information about individual customers, including the zip code calculated by the iAd server, with advertisers.  Apple retains a record of each ad sent to a particular device in a separate iAd database, accessible only by Apple, to ensure that customers do not receive overly repetitive and/or duplicative ads for administrative purposes."

The Democrat Representative Markey received the letter with mild praise for Apple, stating, "Apple's responses provided additional information about how it uses location data and the ability of consumers to exercise control over a variety of features on Apple's products, and I appreciate the company's response."

Republican Representative Barton sounded a bit more skeptical, stating, "While I applaud Apple for responding to our questions.  I remain concerned about privacy policies that run on for pages and pages. I hope every business uses information for advertising and marketing purposes that will work toward more transparency and complete disclosure about their practices, as well as robust security for the information they hold."

AT&T and Apple recently lost over 100,000 iPad subscribers' personal email addresses.  The issue hits close to home as the iPad and iPhone are very popular among both politicians on both sides of the aisle in Washington D.C.  Overseas, foreign politicians are very concerned about Apple's increased surveillance of users; in fact Germany has threatened action against Apple over it.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By michael67 on 7/20/2010 6:39:27 PM , Rating: 2
It makes perfect sense, people should get a screen ware the get the option to get "in" to the location advertising, ore "out"

There are ofc some benefits of getting in to it.

Lets say you want to eat something, you fill in to you iPhone/Droid that your looking for food.
This information is send to a server together whit your location.
Server sends you back all the restaurants whit in driving/walking distance, maybe even whit the daily specialty.
For me this would be still acceptably as long as its only sending loc. data on my request.

But other people are maybe comfortable whit giving up more data.
Something like, when they walk past a supermarket, they want to be notified what is in offer that week.
That would be for me unacceptable, but there are other that are happy to give that information up, and think they will be better of in the long run, i am not one of them do!

For me its simple if Apple really care about there costumers and not only about $$$ then they let there costumers them self have the choice.

But apparently these days are long gone for Apple, and they are against everything they stood for 25 years ago.

"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki