Print 48 comment(s) - last by quiksilvr.. on Jul 21 at 2:14 PM

  (Source: Alternative Resource Energy)
Could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 86 percent

Keeping in line with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revealed that it will need 800 million gallons of biodiesel in the United States domestic market in 2011.

The EISA "expanded" the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2), which has volume requirements for Biomass-based Diesel, undifferentiated Advanced Biofuels and Cellulosic Biofuels. Biodiesel is the only commercially accepted U.S.-made Advanced Biofuel that fits the description of an undifferentiated Advanced Biofuel and Biomass-based diesel, and it can cut greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 86 percent when made from animal fats, agricultural oils, and waste greases. 

The EPA, under the RFS2 program, must determine applicable percentage standards "for each compliance year prior to November 30" of the year before, and then publishes it. Today's published document from the EPA has initiated the finalization of this rule and will kickstart the 2011 volume requirements provided by the RFS2.

"We applaud EPA for this announcement and for reaffirming the common sense notion that we should displace petroleum diesel fuel with Advanced Biofuels like biodiesel," said Manning Feraci, Vice President of Federal Affairs for the National Biodiesel Board. "This notice demonstrates to all actors in the fuels marketplace that the volume goals for Biomass-based Diesel provided for by law in the RFS2 program will be met and that 800 million gallons of biodiesel must be used in 2011."

The EPA hopes to mix 13.95 billion gallons of biofuels into the fuel supply, which is a total of 7.95 percent of all fuel used by U.S. vehicles. This is an increase of 1 billion gallons from the 2010 target of 12.95 billion gallons, and of this total, 800 million gallons of biodiesel must be mixed into the United States' overall diesel supply. 

Biofuel producers are concerned with whether these production levels can be reached due to biodiesel prices being much more expensive than regular diesel. Producers would like to see Congress pass a $1 per gallon biodiesel tax once again, since it expired last year, in order to make biodiesel more affordable. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Horrible idea
By torpor on 7/20/2010 9:58:25 AM , Rating: 0
As a person living in a state which grows a lot of field corn (the stuff used for fuel is not sweet corn), this is a terrible idea.

"Biodiesel" or ethanol as everyone without an agenda calls it, is a water-based fuel.

Why is that important?

Because the water content rots pipelines. You cannot pipe this stuff - you have to truck it. All of it. Everywhere you want it to go, from field to plant to distribution terminal to refueling station. This is an immense expenditure of fuel (carbon) compared to pipelines.

When you factor in shipping costs and the petroleum used in fertilizer to grow the stuff, ethanol is net WORSE than traditional diesel.

The only reason this is out there is that corn is a massive agribusiness that pays politicians.

More info:

RE: Horrible idea
By mattclary on 7/20/2010 10:15:09 AM , Rating: 2
The difference between ethanol and biodiesel. Ethanol is an alcohol, biodiesel is not.

RE: Horrible idea
By mattclary on 7/20/2010 10:16:15 AM , Rating: 2
RE: Horrible idea
By bobsmith1492 on 7/20/2010 10:28:31 AM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty sure you are confusing ethanol and biodiesel...

RE: Horrible idea
By teohhanhui on 7/20/2010 11:13:06 AM , Rating: 2
"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki