Print 42 comment(s) - last by YashBudini.. on Jul 15 at 12:48 PM

Containment Cap  (Source: CNN)
Two-day testing will reveal if it is effective or not

After nearly three months of trying to contain the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico with containment caps/domesrobotic submarines, the "top kill" effort, and tools to transport oil up to ships like the riser insertion tube tool (RITT), which have all failed to completely stop the leak, BP is now placing a new cap over the well in hopes of finally containing the oil for good.

The new 18-foot, 150,000-pound cap was placed over the well with robotic arms on Monday and tests are being run to determine if this is the right procedure for the job. So far, oil is still flowing from the upper section of the new cap, but BP said they expected this to happen until the company begins "well integrity tests" today. BP noted that they don't expect any oil to be released during the test, but that this doesn't indicate that the flow of oil has been stopped permanently. 

The test is expected to take anywhere from six hours to two days, but it's possible for the tests to be extended even further. The data gathered during the tests will be shared and reviewed with "relevant government agencies." According to retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, scientists will be checking the pressure inside the well and will then determine if the cap is containing the oil or if they will need to continue siphoning oil to ships at the surface. 

Allen hopes that the new containment cap can close down the valves and hold all of the oil, but BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles mentioned that it's important to first make sure there is no hydrate buildup. A huge problem in the process of placing the new cap is the possibility of new damage to the blowout preventer. 

The new containment cap has brought some new features to the table, such as allowing four collection ships instead of three (which is what the old cap allowed) to siphon oil, if oil collection is still needed after today's tests. According to BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells, 60,000 to 80,000 barrels of oil could be collected a day over the next two to three weeks if oil collection is still part of the containment process, thanks to the addition of an extra collection ship. Recently, Helix Producer ship was placed with the Q4000 collection ship and together, they are expected to gather up to 33,000 barrels of oil per day. 

In addition to new containment caps and more collection ships, a new moratorium order issued by the U.S. Interior Department is doing its part in preventing any more disasters like this from happening. 

The new moratorium is to "protect communities, coasts and wildlife" by making oil companies establish safety measures in order to reduce the risks of oil spills and blowouts in the future while deepwater drilling. This is the U.S. Interior Department's second effort to diminish deepwater oil and natural gas projects.

A previous ban after the Gulf oil spill was thrown out by a federal judge, but after a federal appeals panel "rejected the government's request to overturn the lower court judge's decision," the U.S. Interior Department issued a new order that supersedes the previous one. 

This new ban would be in effect until November 30, 2010 or until deepwater drilling operations are deemed safe by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. Such a ban would insure that deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico would be suspended until the oil leak is resolved and officials can figure out what went wrong April 20 and what to do to prevent it in the future.

"More than eighty days into the BP oil spill, a pause on deepwater drilling is essential and appropriate to protect communities, coasts and wildlife from the risks that deepwater drilling currently pose," said Salazar. "I am basing my decision on evidence that grows every day of the industry's inability in the deepwater to contain a catastrophic blowout, respond to an oil spill and to operate safely.

"I remain open to modifying the new deepwater drilling suspensions based on new information."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: All that oil...
By FITCamaro on 7/13/2010 11:48:18 PM , Rating: 5
Yes they try to capture as much as they can. Assuming it can be, it is refined.

One thing this spill has done is put to rest the Democrat lie that there isn't any oil in the Gulf so its not worth drilling out there.

RE: All that oil...
By hr824 on 7/14/2010 1:06:14 AM , Rating: 5
True but it does prove the Republican lie that corporations will always self regulate.

RE: All that oil...
By LoweredExpectations on 7/14/10, Rating: 0
RE: All that oil...
By Kurz on 7/14/2010 9:07:31 AM , Rating: 2
Self regulate isn't the word...
It should be about contracts with the states that would find themselves economically hurt by an accident.
That is the best regulation.

RE: All that oil...
By twhittet on 7/14/2010 11:05:50 AM , Rating: 2
Pretty sure BP is going to be financially hurt, but that didn't exactly stop this, or even keep it from lasting months.

If you give a gambler $ to gamble, they will gamble.

RE: All that oil...
By Kurz on 7/14/2010 12:25:56 PM , Rating: 2
Every industry in the world strives to cut costs.
Thats capitalism, before you demonize capitalism you have to see that without it we would be living in worse off state. We wouldn't have the same level of comfort as we do today.

Though I can argue that the current contract with the MMS and the Federal government we much more lax than a contract between BP and the States. The pay out cap was only 70 million dollars for crist sakes. This unrealistic damage assessment led to cutting on the Self Regulation.

Was it considered a gamble? We have honestly no clue until the relief wells have been drilled.

RE: All that oil...
By clovell on 7/14/2010 2:00:19 PM , Rating: 3
...and somewhere in-between lies the truth. Too bad America hates a moderate...

RE: All that oil...
By iNGEN2 on 7/15/2010 9:21:26 AM , Rating: 2
As the politicians have arranged it, I wholeheartedly agree. Although I disagree with the premise. There can be no effective self-regulation when there exists a government enforceable limit on damages should a disaster occur. 70 million dollar limit...come on! Self-regulation isn't even on the minds of contract negotiators when the damage limit is lower than the cost of a replacement rig.

Just more intentionally deceitful garbage spewing from the mouths of the commercial and political elites. Where have you gone Andrew Jackson? Your countrymen need you again.

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki