backtop


Print 42 comment(s) - last by YashBudini.. on Jul 15 at 12:48 PM


Containment Cap  (Source: CNN)
Two-day testing will reveal if it is effective or not

After nearly three months of trying to contain the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico with containment caps/domesrobotic submarines, the "top kill" effort, and tools to transport oil up to ships like the riser insertion tube tool (RITT), which have all failed to completely stop the leak, BP is now placing a new cap over the well in hopes of finally containing the oil for good.

The new 18-foot, 150,000-pound cap was placed over the well with robotic arms on Monday and tests are being run to determine if this is the right procedure for the job. So far, oil is still flowing from the upper section of the new cap, but BP said they expected this to happen until the company begins "well integrity tests" today. BP noted that they don't expect any oil to be released during the test, but that this doesn't indicate that the flow of oil has been stopped permanently. 

The test is expected to take anywhere from six hours to two days, but it's possible for the tests to be extended even further. The data gathered during the tests will be shared and reviewed with "relevant government agencies." According to retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, scientists will be checking the pressure inside the well and will then determine if the cap is containing the oil or if they will need to continue siphoning oil to ships at the surface. 

Allen hopes that the new containment cap can close down the valves and hold all of the oil, but BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles mentioned that it's important to first make sure there is no hydrate buildup. A huge problem in the process of placing the new cap is the possibility of new damage to the blowout preventer. 

The new containment cap has brought some new features to the table, such as allowing four collection ships instead of three (which is what the old cap allowed) to siphon oil, if oil collection is still needed after today's tests. According to BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells, 60,000 to 80,000 barrels of oil could be collected a day over the next two to three weeks if oil collection is still part of the containment process, thanks to the addition of an extra collection ship. Recently, Helix Producer ship was placed with the Q4000 collection ship and together, they are expected to gather up to 33,000 barrels of oil per day. 

In addition to new containment caps and more collection ships, a new moratorium order issued by the U.S. Interior Department is doing its part in preventing any more disasters like this from happening. 

The new moratorium is to "protect communities, coasts and wildlife" by making oil companies establish safety measures in order to reduce the risks of oil spills and blowouts in the future while deepwater drilling. This is the U.S. Interior Department's second effort to diminish deepwater oil and natural gas projects.

A previous ban after the Gulf oil spill was thrown out by a federal judge, but after a federal appeals panel "rejected the government's request to overturn the lower court judge's decision," the U.S. Interior Department issued a new order that supersedes the previous one. 

This new ban would be in effect until November 30, 2010 or until deepwater drilling operations are deemed safe by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. Such a ban would insure that deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico would be suspended until the oil leak is resolved and officials can figure out what went wrong April 20 and what to do to prevent it in the future.

"More than eighty days into the BP oil spill, a pause on deepwater drilling is essential and appropriate to protect communities, coasts and wildlife from the risks that deepwater drilling currently pose," said Salazar. "I am basing my decision on evidence that grows every day of the industry's inability in the deepwater to contain a catastrophic blowout, respond to an oil spill and to operate safely.

"I remain open to modifying the new deepwater drilling suspensions based on new information."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Die BP
By Performance Fanboi on 7/13/2010 7:21:33 PM , Rating: -1
Good job Namechimp.

You make an assumtion that I am an American and then call me stupid - you gonna put gum in my hair next?

1) There are other countries in the world besides the U.S. - if you had half a brain you would have likely noticed this.
2) A company that drills for and extracts oil from the ground should be prepared for spills should it not?
3) If shareholders in companies such as this demanded a higher standard of operations instead of only worrying about their bottom lines the governments of the world would not need legislation.
4) A-holes like you are a dime a dozen and a big reason why some people think all Americans arrogant - douchebags have a way of sticking in your memory.


RE: Die BP
By dflynchimp on 7/13/2010 7:42:30 PM , Rating: 2
Surprising enough, just from reading the above posts, I find that his post was rather civil, and yours, well, let's just say I'd recommend a good anger management class.


RE: Die BP
By Mr772 on 7/13/2010 7:54:45 PM , Rating: 1
So calling somone you don't know stupid is civil to you? How sad.....for you.


RE: Die BP
By clovell on 7/14/2010 2:08:02 PM , Rating: 2
No, reading a post devoid of the word 'American' and then accusing the poster of presuming you're American actually MAKES you stupid.

If people can't be assed to read and understand something before they pop off in response to it, then they are stupid.

QE-effing-D.


RE: Die BP
By Performance Fanboi on 7/14/2010 8:56:30 PM , Rating: 2
I guess a lot of non-Americans have 401k's.


RE: Die BP
By namechamps on 7/13/2010 7:53:21 PM , Rating: 2
Couple points since virtually nothing you said was accurate.

First BP is not an American company. It is a British company. Second not all shareholders of BP are American or even British. Shareholders are international.

Even if BP was American and all shareholders were American it still wouldn't matter because the legal concept of a corporations is that of limited liability. This is true in America, Russia, China, or South Africa. The concept of corproation is an entity that survives the death of the owners and in which liability is limited to the investment in the entity. The most basic research (reading wikipedia) would have informed you of how and why this is true.

The most that can legally happen to a shareholder is they lose 100% of their investment; the stock goes to $0.00 or 0.00 Euros or 0.00 Yuan. This isn't done to "punish" shareholders rather it is a mechanism of the system of capitalism in which poor investments result in losses for investors.

lastly you seem to be confused about the level of power, insight, and control shareholders have. Were you are the Deep Water Horizon design was flawed and BP cut corners in the design and drilling? If not then shareholders didn't either.

Shareholders shouldn't be liable for something beyond their control simply because you are angry and need someone to vent your anger on.


RE: Die BP
By Daniel8uk on 7/14/10, Rating: -1
RE: Die BP
By YashBudini on 7/15/10, Rating: 0
“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki