backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by piroroadkill.. on Jul 15 at 3:53 AM


An ingot of Plutonium-238, the typical power source used by NASA for its probes.  (Source: Discovery News)

The Cassini probe (pictured), the Voyager probes, and the Pioneer probes are all powered by Pu-238. NASA does not have enough Pu-238 to power its upcoming Mars Space Laboratory mission.  (Source: Space Pictures)
Radioactive isotope is vital for powering deep-space probes

Europe, a leader in nuclear power, has announced that it intends to lend its American counterparts a hand by making Pu-238 for NASA.  David Southwood, ESA's director of science and robotic exploration, in an interview with Spaceflight Now, states, "Our target is to have an independent capability, which may help our American friends."

Since the Pioneer and Voyager missions of the 1970s, NASA has been using the radioactive plutonium-238 (or Pu-238) isotope to power its deep space missions.  The radioactive source has a very long half-life of 87.7 years.  Over that period it slowly decays, releasing a steady stream of thermal energy in the process.  That thermal energy is harvested by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) in the probes to make power.

More recent missions to use the technology include the Cassini Equinox and New Horizons missions.

Unfortunately, NASA's plutonium stockpile has almost been exhausted, even as agency prepares its new Mars Space Laboratory which will require the isotope for power.  There's really no alternative currently for NASA, as the operational range of many of its missions place it well outside the spatial volume where the sun's rays are strong enough to provide a decent level of solar power.

At a base level, NASA's plutonium shortage is due to the fact that Pu-238 production is expensive and tightly regulated.  The U.S. Department of Energy, due to budget cuts, lacks the money to fund additional production.  

Despite the fact that the material is not fissible -- hence cannot be made into atomic bombs -- tight regulations are further constraining the supply, limiting trade to only a couple potential candidates.  One of those candidates -- Russia -- is locked in a contract dispute with NASA, essentially ruling out its possibility as a source for now. 

Jim Adams, deputy director of NASA's planetary science division optimistically states, "If we close another deal with the Russians for another delivery of plutonium-238, or get domestic production restarted, there's sufficient plutonium well out past the Outer Planets Flagship Mission."

Fortunately, the European Space Agency is looking to come to NASA's rescue, announcing that it will begin producing Pu-238 and offering it to its American partner.  Europe is a world leader in nuclear power, with the majority of EU member France's power coming from nuclear energy.

The move will allow it to provide fuel for the $4.5B joint U.S.-Europe flagship mission to the Jovian moon Europa -- fuel that NASA currently lacks.  The ESA's Southwood states, "To see see ourselves as a serious planetary science partner on the world stage with the United States, we're building up our nuclear capability for European-built RTGs.  We are building for a pretty major capability being available in Europe in the 2020s."

The final production decision for the nuclear isotope will take place in 2011 or 2014 at EU council meetings.

Another perhaps possibility for both the EU and U.S. is to alternatively produce Americium-241.  This radioactive isotope has the advantage of being plentiful (it is found in most nuclear waste) and has an extremely long half life of 432.2 years.  However, its power output (114 watts decay heat/kg) is much lower than Pu-238's (560 watts decay heat/kg).  And it is more dangerous and hard to handle.

Warns Adams, "Plutonium-238 is an alpha emitter, and you can shield alpha particles with a piece of paper.  It's neutrons that damage people, and americium is more a neutron emitter than plutonium-238."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Smoke Detectors
By HomerTNachoCheese on 7/12/2010 2:37:50 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Another perhaps possibility for both the EU and U.S. is to alternatively produce Americium-241. This radioactive isotope has the advantage of being plentiful (it is found in most nuclear waste) ... And it is more dangerous and hard to handle. ...It's neutrons that damage people, and americium is more a neutron emitter than plutonium-238."


Americium-241 is in your smoke detectors - at least the cheap ones that the government wants you to have in your homes. It is cheaper for the government to put this in your smoke detector than it is for the government to dispose of it.




RE: Smoke Detectors
By randomly on 7/13/2010 1:07:18 PM , Rating: 3
This is nonsense.

The amount of Americium-241 used in smoke detectors is a tiny fraction of the total amount that is in spent fuel. It is in fact much more expensive to extract and purify the Am-241 used in smoke detectors than it is to just leave it in the spent fuel.

The incredibly tiny amount of Am241 in smoke detectors is there to make the smoke detectors work. That's it. It has nothing to with disposal conspiracy theories.


RE: Smoke Detectors
By monkeyman1140 on 7/13/10, Rating: 0
RE: Smoke Detectors
By delphinus100 on 7/13/2010 5:48:53 PM , Rating: 2
...And that more people die of smoke inhalation than from the fire itself, sometimes in rooms the fire never reaches.


RE: Smoke Detectors
By piroroadkill on 7/15/2010 3:53:07 AM , Rating: 2
Really? Ionizing smoke detectors are a global conspiracy now? Jesus christ man


"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki