backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by piroroadkill.. on Jul 15 at 3:53 AM


An ingot of Plutonium-238, the typical power source used by NASA for its probes.  (Source: Discovery News)

The Cassini probe (pictured), the Voyager probes, and the Pioneer probes are all powered by Pu-238. NASA does not have enough Pu-238 to power its upcoming Mars Space Laboratory mission.  (Source: Space Pictures)
Radioactive isotope is vital for powering deep-space probes

Europe, a leader in nuclear power, has announced that it intends to lend its American counterparts a hand by making Pu-238 for NASA.  David Southwood, ESA's director of science and robotic exploration, in an interview with Spaceflight Now, states, "Our target is to have an independent capability, which may help our American friends."

Since the Pioneer and Voyager missions of the 1970s, NASA has been using the radioactive plutonium-238 (or Pu-238) isotope to power its deep space missions.  The radioactive source has a very long half-life of 87.7 years.  Over that period it slowly decays, releasing a steady stream of thermal energy in the process.  That thermal energy is harvested by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) in the probes to make power.

More recent missions to use the technology include the Cassini Equinox and New Horizons missions.

Unfortunately, NASA's plutonium stockpile has almost been exhausted, even as agency prepares its new Mars Space Laboratory which will require the isotope for power.  There's really no alternative currently for NASA, as the operational range of many of its missions place it well outside the spatial volume where the sun's rays are strong enough to provide a decent level of solar power.

At a base level, NASA's plutonium shortage is due to the fact that Pu-238 production is expensive and tightly regulated.  The U.S. Department of Energy, due to budget cuts, lacks the money to fund additional production.  

Despite the fact that the material is not fissible -- hence cannot be made into atomic bombs -- tight regulations are further constraining the supply, limiting trade to only a couple potential candidates.  One of those candidates -- Russia -- is locked in a contract dispute with NASA, essentially ruling out its possibility as a source for now. 

Jim Adams, deputy director of NASA's planetary science division optimistically states, "If we close another deal with the Russians for another delivery of plutonium-238, or get domestic production restarted, there's sufficient plutonium well out past the Outer Planets Flagship Mission."

Fortunately, the European Space Agency is looking to come to NASA's rescue, announcing that it will begin producing Pu-238 and offering it to its American partner.  Europe is a world leader in nuclear power, with the majority of EU member France's power coming from nuclear energy.

The move will allow it to provide fuel for the $4.5B joint U.S.-Europe flagship mission to the Jovian moon Europa -- fuel that NASA currently lacks.  The ESA's Southwood states, "To see see ourselves as a serious planetary science partner on the world stage with the United States, we're building up our nuclear capability for European-built RTGs.  We are building for a pretty major capability being available in Europe in the 2020s."

The final production decision for the nuclear isotope will take place in 2011 or 2014 at EU council meetings.

Another perhaps possibility for both the EU and U.S. is to alternatively produce Americium-241.  This radioactive isotope has the advantage of being plentiful (it is found in most nuclear waste) and has an extremely long half life of 432.2 years.  However, its power output (114 watts decay heat/kg) is much lower than Pu-238's (560 watts decay heat/kg).  And it is more dangerous and hard to handle.

Warns Adams, "Plutonium-238 is an alpha emitter, and you can shield alpha particles with a piece of paper.  It's neutrons that damage people, and americium is more a neutron emitter than plutonium-238."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I fixed the supply problem!
By blueeyesm on 7/12/2010 10:58:31 AM , Rating: 5
I secretly slipped in containers with VO5 and glitter mixed together!

Shhhh....




RE: I fixed the supply problem!
By Kurz on 7/12/2010 11:10:29 AM , Rating: 2
Shhhhhh....
Not so loud!


RE: I fixed the supply problem!
By DEVGRU on 7/12/2010 11:38:43 AM , Rating: 2
I really enjoyed that movie, actually. A little hokey, but above average for 80's movies. :)


RE: I fixed the supply problem!
By phxfreddy on 7/13/2010 1:06:36 AM , Rating: 2
The media obsessed !

.....could you let us who have real lives in on the joke and tell me what movie you are referring to????


By monkeyman1140 on 7/13/2010 3:22:44 PM , Rating: 2
If that kid was so smart, why didn't he put a slug of lead between the batteries and the physics package?

DUHHHH!!!


"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki