Germany Sues Facebook For Violating Users' Privacy
July 8, 2010 6:03 PM
comment(s) - last by
Could cost the company tens of thousands of euros
It looks like
isn't the only company Germany is looking to pick a bone with regarding user privacy. A German data protection official has
prepared legal proceedings
against social networking giant Facebook, which has had a history of
privacy related problems
in the past.
The data protection official, Johannes Caspar, who works in the Hamburg branch, has accused Facebook of illegally "accessing and saving personal data" of those who do not have a profile registered on the site.
Facebook changed its privacy settings in April in order to allow any user to block access to their e-mail contacts. But for Germany, a country that has strict privacy laws that outline the kind of information and amount of information that can be accessed and by whom, this slight privacy change wasn't enough.
Caspar has said the contacts that have been previously saved have not been erased, and are now being used for marketing-related purposes. He made it clear that this is a
breach of data
privacy laws and that it's important to save this information from third parties.
"It is a system that is designed around making it possible for Facebook to expand, for its own benefit," said Caspar. "Given that several million people in Germany alone are members, this is a very unsettling notion."
Caspar reported that many people have contacted his office with complaints regarding the
Facebook privacy invasion
. Facebook has until August 11 to formally respond to Germany's complaint. These legal allegations against Facebook could result in the company paying tens of thousands of euros.
Ilse Aigner, Germany's consumer protection minister, has already taken a proactive stance against Facebook by opting to delete her Facebook account, saying that the company isn't doing enough to secure the privacy of its users.
In addition to problems with Facebook, Germany has initiated an investigation that will look into
Google's Street View
mapping program and
continues to battle with Apple
over the company's tracking and collection of iPhone users' data.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Love it
7/9/2010 2:52:50 AM
What I love is the typically conceited "I know better, everyone else is stupid" tone to your commnet :o)
You do have something of a point tho, but what is often not taken into account is that we are treating these websites and businesses like age old companies and businesses. However, they are in fact very new and the way that they work, along with the ramifications/risks of what being part of them actually means is still being worked through.
Sure, some things might be obvious to you and others on this site, but to most people, the average consumer (who get treated with such contempt on here, I know you guys really don't care about them and think they only exist to be exploited most of the time) who do not have the knowledge, nor do they think for too long (yes, I'm not saying that they are totally innocent either) about theses things, as they trust the sites, especially big sites like facebook, to do the "right" thing. However, what you guys often forget is that there are many other business areas, many non-essential/opt-in areas in which you neither have the knowledge, or inclination to think too hard about what you are doing either, and trust in the fact that governments and consumer groups have worked out, together with the business owners, ways for companies to operate in a reasonable manner to allow them to both run their business and for you to be protected.
Also, lets not kid ourselves that anything is free either shall we? At the very heart of this issue is the cost of taking part in facebook, and how your the information that you hand over
the price you pay, but people are not aware of it, or the value of it. Like a bunch of Native Americans swapping land for some beads because they don't know better. It doesn't make it OK that because you do, so everyone else is fair game.
I'd wager that in the end, rules/codes of practice will be decided on by governments about how they want the people that they are voted in to represent to be treated and what can and cannot be done by sites such as facebook, along with any other social networking site that comes along. We're still learning about the internet and the implications of taking part in it, from both sides as a business and consumer. I know that it's tempting to just call everyone stupid and saying that companies should just be able to exploit everyone they can in order to make money, but that's not how the business world works usually, and IMHO I don't think that it should work that way either. I might know better in this case, but I'm not arrogant enough to think that in every area of commerce I am totally aware of everything that is going on and the risks of taking part in activities within that sector, and frankly, nor do I have the time to learn about every sector either. Yet I am willing to take part in them because I know that I will have some protection and people looking out for me.
In the end, if businesses like facebook want to grow and make money they will need to be trusted. As such, I think all this privacy business will be resolved and it will be win-win. The more people are able to trust them, the more information that people will give, but as it is, people are learning, slowly but surly, that they are being exploited (possibly) or treated a little shabbily (at best) by companies like facebook. As such, they are sorting this stuff out themselves and withdrawing information and the good-will that went along with it, which could well cost facebook more in the end than having a clear policy that people can trust dictated to them by an external body.
"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
Germany Calls Apple's Plan to Track iPhone Users "Unacceptable"
June 28, 2010, 10:28 AM
May 27, 2010, 10:13 AM
Facebook Adds Satire Tags to Its Auto-Generated "Related News" Posts
August 18, 2014, 10:43 AM
Comcast, TWC Pull Dinner Gift for FCC Commissioner... Sort Of
August 15, 2014, 1:10 PM
Comcast Accused of Wooing FCC Commissioner w/ $110K Dinner
August 13, 2014, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Nokia’s Lumia 520 Available for $39.99 Off Contract Today Only
August 13, 2014, 10:37 AM
Wikipedia Scores $140,000 in Bitcoin Donations in One Week
August 11, 2014, 9:32 AM
China to Require Real Names for Chat Apps
August 8, 2014, 8:28 PM
Most Popular Articles
Lumia 830 Gets Major Upgrades Including New 20.1 Megapixel Toshiba Sensor
August 15, 2014, 6:00 PM
Windows Phone, BlackBerry Smartphone Market Share Falls to 2.5%, 0.5% Respectively
August 15, 2014, 9:44 AM
GM Concedes That the Cadillac ELR Doesn’t Really Compete with the Tesla Model S
August 15, 2014, 5:42 PM
Report: Windows 9 “Threshold” Tech Preview Coming Next Month
August 15, 2014, 11:29 AM
Apple Scores Patents, Preps New Reversible USB Plug for iPhone 6 Connector
August 18, 2014, 1:32 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information