backtop


Print 37 comment(s) - last by Spuke.. on Jul 9 at 4:00 PM


The NSA's new program "Perfect Citizen" aims to protect aging internet-connected systems, such as those at the nuclear power plant seen here.  (Source: Tennessee Valley Authority)
Debate continues over whether government is fulfilling its duty to defend or meddling in the private sector

It's little secret that the U.S. cybersecurity could use some help.  Recent studies have shown the nation's power grid and armed forces to be highly vulnerable to a cyberattack from an internet savvy nation like China or Russia.  Under President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama slow steps have been made to improve that state of affairs.

But now there's a growing debate over one of the most ambitious cybersecurity initiatives yet, a program developed by the National Security Agency called "Perfect Citizen".  The program is designed to detect, neutralize, and counter cyberattacks on critical parts of the U.S. private sector -- such as defense contractors, power plants, and major internet firms like Google.  Its critics, though, contend that it is government meddling and playing "Big Brother".

Raytheon Corp. has reportedly been selected to spearhead the initiative, receiving a $100M USD initial phase surveillance contract.  

Internally, there's been discord over the government's plans to peer inside private networks.  States a Raytheon email leaked to 
The Wall Street Journal, "The overall purpose of the [program] is our Government...feel[s] that they need to insure the Public Sector is doing all they can to secure Infrastructure critical to our National Security.  Perfect Citizen is Big Brother."

While the NSA had no official comment, unnamed U.S. officials took issue with the claim that they were playing "Big Brother".  They said the program was vital to protecting the nation and no more intrusive to privacy than traffic cams over intersections.

At the core of the issue is the fact that many "mission critical" systems which drive subway systems, air-traffic control networks, and more are composed of aging machines which were built at a time when security was less understood and considered.  The NSA believes that China and Russian may have gained deep access and exploration into these networks, but it needs to watch them in order to determine the full extent of the penetration.

One of the U.S. government's critical roles is to provide for the defense of the nation.  Under the U.S. constitution the government has the power to "raise and support armies," "provide and maintain a navy," and to "make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces".

Initially, the government began to interface with the private sector -- such as power utilities -- to solve physical problems; for example sealing a manhole cover to a power line going to a critical government center.  However, those efforts quickly expanded to the digital realm.

"Perfect Citizen" sprung from an earlier surveillance project called "April Strawberry".  The new project is still in its early stages, but NSA officials have reportedly met with utility executives and politely asked them to cooperate with the surveillance.  Participation is reportedly voluntary, but those who comply will earn incentives, such as additional government contracts.

Ultimately it may be too early to judge the merits of "Perfect Citizen", but as the program is fleshed out, it seems likely to provoke a lively debate about the government, privacy, and intervention in the private sector.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

private non-IP protocol network?
By NotAboveTheLaw on 7/8/2010 1:35:55 PM , Rating: 2
Not sure why the power grid or anything that is not meant for public access on the internet. There are other less used, less understood protocols that can be used that most people would not have access to from their PC's. Seems like the power grid should be on their own private network. The Internet is not made to be secure so don't use this excuse to invade my privacy. Fix your own network by using a private network and/or different protocol or sub it out to someone who knows how to do this. That goes for the Federal government networks also. This is an excuse to try to take over the communications similar to what Hugh Chavez did.




RE: private non-IP protocol network?
By NotAboveTheLaw on 7/8/2010 1:43:59 PM , Rating: 2
I meant Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela.


RE: private non-IP protocol network?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 7/8/2010 6:23:20 PM , Rating: 2
You would need to write something new from the ground up, and then who would support it? The costs to have such a specialized network would be quite insane. Easier and cheaper to set up an isolated one without external network access and call it a day.


By JonnyDough on 7/9/2010 2:31:44 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. Does anyone else feel that the energy/defense infrastructures ought to be more updated already? They must be quite highly inefficient by today's standards. It just seems that change is costly in the short term, and scary to management. Implementation of new major systems is not usually a perfectly smooth process either. Its no surprise that it takes the energy sector/DOD a long time to get around to making these updates. Its actually a bit sad that it would require recent (perceived?) security threats to update outdated and inefficient computer and network systems.


"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki