Print 97 comment(s) - last by Spuke.. on Jul 7 at 3:04 PM

Tesla Roadster 2.5  (Source: Tesla Motors)
Extended production sales leads to the electric sports car's makeover

The Tesla Roadster is receiving its fourth major production update with the new Roadster 2.5, a revised version of the electric sports car with a new grille and rear bumper.

The 2011 Tesla Roadster 2.5 received an updated grille that resembles the design of the Model S as well as a new rear bumper with a diffuser element. Other cosmetic changes include more comfortable seats, improved surface finishes and an optional seven inch touchscreen display that includes a backup camera. So far, there are no powertrain changes to the vehicle.

Earlier this year, Tesla planned to stop production of the Roadster and announced in a Form S-1 filing of its preliminary prospectus with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the company would replace the Roadster with a new model that would be introduced in 2013 at the very soonest. 

But in March of this year, the auto company said they negotiated further with key suppliers and felt they could increase the Roadster's production by 40 percent, extending sales into 2012. Undoubtedly, Tesla's recent success with their initial public offering, which helped the automaker earn over US $226 million from share purchases, has put the company in a better financial place and is helping them stay on track with the 2012 goal. 

Originally, the shares were expected to sell for $14-$16 a piece, but ended up selling for $17. In addition, there was an increase in the number of shares sold. Tesla planned to release 11.1 million shares, but released 13.3 million shares instead, and at a higher cost, which makes this a triumphant success for the auto company. Though, only 17 percent of shares have been sold to the public.

Tesla stocks are now over $21.50 a share, and Tesla is valued at US $1.33 billion. With the IPO's help in bringing Tesla out of a financial crisis, the company's production plan consists of releasing the Roadster 2.5 in 2011 and the Model S in 2012. In addition, the automaker has opened two new Tesla stores in Newport Beach, California and Copenhagen, Denmark. 

No prices on the Roadster 2.5 have been released yet, but the vehicle is available for order and will appear in Tesla stores everywhere "soon."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Government subsidies
By Dewey115 on 7/6/2010 2:28:09 PM , Rating: 2
Efficiency is at the core; if 1% of your money is taken and wasted, that is too much tax compared to 10% of your money taken and used for things that actually benefit you. Tax is inherently tied to result, and if the results are good, then the tax is worth it.

This is exactly what I said, which was in contrast to the "the lowest possible" comment posted by someone that is not me. I never said to pay as much as possible, and I have stressed efficiency in every post. My argument is not to take all of our money, my argument is (and has been) that it is better to have higher taxes used well to improve the lives of everyone in the country. I totally agree that "good" and "worth it" are subjective and different for everyone, I never said otherwise.
It is unfounded to recognize a high tax for what it is? I don't think you're going on the offensive, bud; it looks like a defensive tone in your posts. I think you're reading too much into others posts.

Following the quote above "high" is subjective. The original post leading to this was about how "high" taxes are in other countries when they provide more with that money. The arguement was that it was a waste and that started this whole debate in all its glory. I dont consider my position defensive as I have pretty much steered this debate in its entirety. If I was being defensive I would have made a statement and spend the rest of the posts defending it, this has evolved as I saw fit... seems pretty much an offensive IMO.
I don't see that attitude at all. While it is true that any large enough group of people will have the extremely vocal minority of douchebags that won't listen to reason, the vast majority of opinions from that group will be more reasoned. And while there is some vitriol being used in other posts, I don't see this "US is best" attitude that you seem to observe.

The majority of comments about the cost and price of healthcare as well as our "abilities" in regard to preserving life and mending injuries was not based on anything factual but instead on the belief that the US is number one just because it is. Not one person anywhere at any time here has offered even one source to show me that the United States of America is rating number 1 in anything related to healthcare (aside from being most expensive.) Read through the posts objectively and you will see it, unless you think spouting opinion as fact is valid. In which case we dont need to continue this as my goal is in no way to change your opinions, you can keep them no matter how much the differ from mine... I just dont like to see people saying something is the truth when it clearly is not.
Yup, sometimes the choices you need to make to save your life or improve your health are difficult ones. I think it's wonderful that those choices exist, as opposed to some government-supplied health care plans that don't allow for some choices.
There are always choices, my arguement is that health choices should not negatively impact your life. If you need to file for bankruptcy because of a medical accident I feel there is something wrong. Credit is meant to show how responsible or not someone is with their finances. If you need a heart operation that results in $150k in bills, how does that mean that you are irresponsible with money? How does that negatively reflect on your normal ability to pay off a car loan? I dont see how those two should be related in any way at all...
And I think that's exactly why credit exists, for awful unavoidable emergencies.

So your saying that everyone should buy their house with cash? I'm pretty sure credit was established as a way for people to make large purchases while posing as little risk as possible to the ones lending the money. Now credit cards were originally intended to serve in emergencies, but credit was around long before such a thing as credit cards.
If bankruptcy were easy, it would be heavily abused.

Bankruptcy is very easy btw... as long as you aren't rich I guess.
I don't know why you'd even look, as I certainly didn't specify "emergency treatment".

Totally my assumption, if we aren't talking about emergency treatment then why are we talking about it. Are you saying that every doctor or dentist in the US HAS to see everyone who comes in? That just isn't true at all, those rules are for emergency treatment, we are no different in that regard. Why would you even point that out? The whole comment makes no sense unless you were talking about emergency treatment.

"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki