backtop


Print 73 comment(s) - last by jinky2010.. on Jul 10 at 12:56 AM


Apple CEO Steve Jobs holding an iPhone 4  (Source: Brisbane Times)
Suit seeks unspecified damages

The iPhone 4 had only been on the market for a few hours when some users started to complain that the device had poor reception. Part of the issue is the design of the antenna, which is integrated into the phone and visible on the metal band sandwiched between the front and back glass of the smartphone.

Shortly after the issues caught on in the media, the subject of class action suits started being bandied about. The first of the suits has been filed and is seeking class action status in the United States Court for the District of Maryland. The two main plaintiffs in the case are Kevin McCaffrey of Nottingham, Maryland and Linda Wrinn of Baltimore, Maryland. The suit seeks a jury trial.

A few of the major claims in the suit are general negligence on behalf of Apple and AT&T, defect in design, manufacture and assembly on behalf of Apple, breach of express warranty and implied warranty by Apple and AT&T, deceptive trade practices by both companies and intentional misrepresentation by both companies. A total of nine claims are made.

The suit documents don't offer a specific amount of money being sought in the "Prayer for Relief" section and asks the judge to award any such relief that may be just and proper.

The early complaints allege that when the iPhone 4 is held just right the iPhone drops from four or five bars when sitting on the table to one bar or in some cases no service at all when held in the hand and much of the antenna is covered by the palm. The solution to the problem according to Steve Jobs is to simply not hold the smartphone that way.

Apple has continued to maintain that there are no reception issues on the phone and that the performance users are seeing is normal.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 9 Counts?
By wgbutler on 7/2/2010 9:46:41 AM , Rating: 2
quote:

While restitution to the people screwed over by Apple is important


No one has been "screwed over"!

THERE IS A 30 DAY REFUND POLICY!!!!!

This lawsuit is all about some greedy lawyers wanting to make a quick buck. Apple won't be affected that much.

If lawsuits become routine, they will just pass on their legal expenses to the consumers. And with higher Apple prices the Android companies will have more room to raise THEIR prices. And in 10 years when you are paying $1000 for a new cell phone, hopefully you'll be able to connect the dots.


RE: 9 Counts?
By omnicronx on 7/4/2010 6:07:41 PM , Rating: 2
Are you seriously trying to imply that a company with one of the largest market caps in the world and 40 billion in the bank can't afford to take on such a lawsuit without affecting its customers?

Apple takes on lawsuits all the time, you just don't hear about it. When you are raking in insanely high profit margins like Apple has been, you don't take a chance and pass on the outcome of simple lawsuits to the consumer.

While I agree with you in theory, I don't agree in this situation. I'd be willing to take wagers that this will not happen next time around. i.e This will most likely help consumers, not hurt them.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki