Print 73 comment(s) - last by jinky2010.. on Jul 10 at 12:56 AM

Apple CEO Steve Jobs holding an iPhone 4  (Source: Brisbane Times)
Suit seeks unspecified damages

The iPhone 4 had only been on the market for a few hours when some users started to complain that the device had poor reception. Part of the issue is the design of the antenna, which is integrated into the phone and visible on the metal band sandwiched between the front and back glass of the smartphone.

Shortly after the issues caught on in the media, the subject of class action suits started being bandied about. The first of the suits has been filed and is seeking class action status in the United States Court for the District of Maryland. The two main plaintiffs in the case are Kevin McCaffrey of Nottingham, Maryland and Linda Wrinn of Baltimore, Maryland. The suit seeks a jury trial.

A few of the major claims in the suit are general negligence on behalf of Apple and AT&T, defect in design, manufacture and assembly on behalf of Apple, breach of express warranty and implied warranty by Apple and AT&T, deceptive trade practices by both companies and intentional misrepresentation by both companies. A total of nine claims are made.

The suit documents don't offer a specific amount of money being sought in the "Prayer for Relief" section and asks the judge to award any such relief that may be just and proper.

The early complaints allege that when the iPhone 4 is held just right the iPhone drops from four or five bars when sitting on the table to one bar or in some cases no service at all when held in the hand and much of the antenna is covered by the palm. The solution to the problem according to Steve Jobs is to simply not hold the smartphone that way.

Apple has continued to maintain that there are no reception issues on the phone and that the performance users are seeing is normal.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: My bold prediction:
By sprockkets on 7/1/2010 4:04:16 PM , Rating: 2
The iPod and iTunes were *not* a good choice in the beginning. The iPod had such crappy DACs and whatnot that a $10 Chinese "disposable" .mp3 player had the same or better sound quality, and the DRM that came with iTunes was deplorable.

Actually the sound quality of ipods is good; the eq on them sucks.

Sure...eventually iPods caught up with the cheap stuff, and evetually iTunes gave you an option to buy normal .mp3s.

itunes never has and never will use the mp3 format.

But the point is that bajillions of people bought the stuff anyway. Apple doesn't sell technology so much as it sells a self-image, they sell their brand and have managed to convince the unwashed masses that to own an Apple product is to be cool and hip and the only way to express your individuality. By doing the same thing everyone else is doing.

I don't own an ipod, but the touchwheel makes it so darn easy to navigate and use, unlike the other stuff at the time. That, and of course their millions on marketing.

Personally, I think RockBox on a Sansa Clip+ blows everything else out of the water, but the UI on it is of course cumbersome.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki