backtop


Print 37 comment(s) - last by mcnabney.. on Jul 1 at 9:11 PM

KIN's dead baby, KIN's dead

We can't say that we didn't see this one coming. When Microsoft announced the the KIN One and KIN Two smartphones in April, we were concerned that the customers targeted by Microsoft -- those ranging from tweens to college-aged adults -- just weren't gonna fall for these socially-geared phones.

It appears that Microsoft found out too late that no one was buying their story about how well these devices would be received by consumers. Today, Microsoft confirmed that both the KIN One and KIN Two are getting the axe:

We have made the decision to focus exclusively on Windows Phone 7 and we will not ship KIN in Europe this fall as planned. Additionally, we are integrating our KIN team with the Windows Phone 7 team, incorporating valuable ideas and technologies from KIN into future Windows Phone releases. We will continue to work with Verizon in the U.S. to sell current KIN phones.

The chubby KIN One was priced at $49 while the keyboard-equipped KIN Two was priced at $99 (both after a $100 mail-in rebate). In addition, both phones had to be paired with a $29 data plan on Verizon's network.

In the face of such powerful (and much more capable) competition like the $99 Apple iPhone 3GS and the $129 HTC Aria, the two KIN phones never stood a chance.

Reviews gave the two devices a "meh" for the most part with Engadget saying, "Here are much better choices for much less money on the market, and Microsoft hasn't demonstrated to us why you would choose this phone over those" and Gizmodo adding, "This bizarre pricing will make potential KIN buyers' minds jump from messaging phones, which the KIN compares favorably to, to thoughts of smartphones, with app stores and full mapping and real browsers."

So long KIN, we hardly knew ye.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Windows Phone 7
By kmmatney on 7/1/2010 2:11:07 AM , Rating: 2
The Zunes were was destined to fail, IMO. When they first came out, I was pretty excited - I thought they would offer more features and a better price. I figured they HAD to, since they were late to the game, they needed to give people incentive to buy them. However they didn't offer any more value - they put themselves at the same prices points as iPods, and unsurprisingly did not sell well.

They were a year late (or more) coming out with a solid state player everyone (including me) has bought their Nanos by then. When they finally did come out, they priced themselves the same as Apple.

By the time the iPod touch came out, it was all over. Again, they didn't give any incentive - like a camera - to buy one. The Touch blows away the Zune HD as a total entertainment device. The only real thing it has going for it is that it is not made by Apple.

As for iTunes - it isn't any worse than the alternatives. You need to spend about a minute getting it configured right (and uninstall the crap you don't need) and it works fine. There are plenty of free alternatives you can use with the iPods as well. I use Floola for my nano, and keep it durectly on the device, so I never need to install software to transfer music. For my phone, I used iTunes once to transfer music and update the OS, but get everythijng else directly on the phone through Wifi or 3G. I do like itunes for listening to my music library in general, though. I tried using my own folders for a while, but iTunes just makes it easier once the music collection gets past 20 GBs.


RE: Windows Phone 7
By hughlle on 7/1/2010 4:51:30 AM , Rating: 2
can't comment on the HD zune vs touch, but my 80gb zune just stomps all over the arse of my ipod classic.


"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki