backtop


Print 73 comment(s) - last by OoklaTheMok.. on Jul 1 at 3:34 PM


Hyundai Veloster Concept

Prototype Veloster testing alongside a VW Scirocco  (Source: Motor Authority)
Hyundai is taking on the big guns from Japan

Reaction to Honda's CR-Z two-seater has been mixed. While the vehicle attempts to capture some of the essence of the CRX which came two decades before it, its performance (0 to 60 mph in around 10 seconds) and fuel economy aren't exactly inspiring given its hybrid powertrain.

The CR-Z only manages to achieve 31/37 mpg (city/highway) with a manual transmission and 36/38 mpg with a CVT transmission -- both figures are well below that of the larger and heavier Toyota Prius.

Hyundai, which is doing its best to punch Toyota and Honda (among others) right in the throat, is now said to be setting its targets on the CR-Z. According to Autoblog, the upcoming Hyundai Veloster -- the replacement for the Hyundai Tiburon -- will achieve 40 mpg by using a regular four-cylinder engine. This shouldn't be too hard a target for Hyundai to reach considering that its 3,200-pound Sonata midsize sedan can already hit 35 mpg on the highway.

While the CR-Z needs a hybrid powertrain to extract somewhat disappointing fuel economy numbers given its 2,750-pound weight, Hyundai says that it needs no such excess baggage. The lighter Veloster is said to be powered by a 1.6-liter engine producing around 140 hp. For comparison, Honda's CR-Z is powered by a 122 hp four-cylinder engine coupled with a 13 hp electric motor.

And if toppling the CR-Z in fuel economy and performance wasn't enough, Hyundai will likely also undercut the pricing of the CR-Z as well due to the Veloster's lack of an expensive hybrid powertrain and batteries. The Veloster also comes with the added utility of seating for four people instead of only two like the CR-Z



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Higher Goals Needed
By transamdude95 on 6/22/2010 9:14:58 AM , Rating: 4
I would definitely take a 15 second 0-60 car with a top speed of 90 or 100mph if it nets me 70+mpg. That's a fair trade off for a daily driver.


RE: Higher Goals Needed
By mindless1 on 6/22/2010 12:44:48 PM , Rating: 3
The problem is there is no market for such a car, in many areas of the world it is REQUIRED to be able to accelerate faster than that in order to safely merge with other traffic.

If you cannot even merge with traffic you cause everyone to put on their brakes and lose fuel economy and cause traffic jams, nevermind the potential safety issues of pileups while riding in a tin can amongst other larger vehicles.


RE: Higher Goals Needed
By sebmel on 6/22/10, Rating: 0
RE: Higher Goals Needed
By Suntan on 6/22/2010 3:03:39 PM , Rating: 2
Just FYI, manganese has a density similar to steel. I think you mean magnesium.

Also, your old diesel lupo would not meet emissions or crash impact standards here in the States.

You want better gas mileage, one way to help would be to get the government to relax its requirements for emissions, and/or get the government (read: insurance lobbyists) to relax their demands on crash worthy-ness.

-Suntan

-Suntan


RE: Higher Goals Needed
By OoklaTheMok on 7/1/2010 3:34:24 PM , Rating: 2
of course!... unrelated regulations are the cause for the lack of significant progress in improving fuel efficiency. We should all just drive cars that are made like tinfoil and crumple up in a little ball when hit by an SUV killing all the passengers inside... but the gas mileage is incredible, or is to die for?

I think you've gotten a bit too much sun...


RE: Higher Goals Needed
By Spuke on 6/22/2010 3:13:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
85mpg UK = 70mpg USA
It would not be 70 mpg US because the way you measure fuel economy is different than how the US does it.


RE: Higher Goals Needed
By Fireshade on 6/23/2010 4:55:40 AM , Rating: 2
He was referring to his own usage, man. Like the other posters above. Not referring to an EPA rating or such.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki