Print 74 comment(s) - last by B3an.. on Jun 17 at 12:19 AM

Apple Mac mini gets a thorough redesign

When it comes to Apple's computing products, there are a few that seem to not get much attention. The Mac Pro is one of them, and the other is the Mac mini. Today, however, Apple is showing a little bit of love for its tiny little desktop machine.

The Mac mini is now sporting an all new design, which looks to be both flatter and wider. The body is now only 1" thick and is carved from a single piece of aluminum. On the bottom of the device is a circular access panel that allows you to gain access to the memory modules.

The Mac mini now sports either a 2.4GHz or 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 2GB of RAM (up to 8GB is supported). Graphics duties are handled by an NVIDIA GeForce 320M integrated GPU with 256MB of DDR3 memory.

Storage duties are handled by either a 320GB or 500GB SATA hard drive. An 8x slot-loading SuperDrive soldiers on for your DVD and CD media.

Port selection includes one Firewire 800 port, four USB 2.0 ports, GbE, HDMI, mini DisplayPort, and an SD slot. Wireless connectivity includes Bluetooth 2.1+EDR and 802.11n.

“The sleek, aluminum Mac mini packs great features, versatility and value into an elegant, amazingly compact design,” said Apple's Philip Schiller. “With twice the graphics performance, HDMI support and industry-leading energy efficiency, customers are going to love the new Mac mini.”

While Apple's new Mac mini is no doubt stylish, you will pay through the nose to get one. Pricing starts at a a whopping $699 (a $100 increase over the previous model) and it is available now from

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Love the form factor, but shouldn't it be an i5?
By Bateluer on 6/15/2010 4:38:59 AM , Rating: 5
Why is it still a C2D? Wasn't the previous iteration of the Mac Mini the same C2D too, 2.4Ghz and 2.66Ghz?

Should really be an i5 now.

By piroroadkill on 6/15/2010 4:43:09 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah. This is boring.

By retepallen on 6/15/2010 5:02:28 AM , Rating: 5
It just means lower cost for Apple and higher margins.

By Mitch101 on 6/15/2010 8:48:20 AM , Rating: 1
This is great news.
The previous generation boxes will now be sold off so that they can buy the newer ones.

Then buy this broadcom chip.

Then install XBMC

By Mitch101 on 6/15/2010 9:02:55 AM , Rating: 2
Here is a better link

Mac Mini + XBMC + Broadcom Crystal HD = 1080p video!

By alanore on 6/15/2010 10:45:31 AM , Rating: 5
Or you could wait a bit and get a Boxee box for under 200 bucks.

By fsardis on 6/15/2010 12:05:27 PM , Rating: 3
What is all this? Command line? On a home system? On an APPLE!! system?!?!?! I thought those things just work. I just plug things and they work like magic. When Steve said BOOM in his presentation he did not say anything about command lines or ignoring errors that OSX pops up.

By quiksilvr on 6/15/2010 8:56:57 AM , Rating: 3
Given that this is running on notebook processors, it isn't shocking its this thin, but what I do find shocking is that they put the power brick inside and they didn't even go to mobile Core i3s to cut the power usage. Makes me wonder how hot this thing will get.

By jonmcc33 on 6/15/2010 3:02:25 PM , Rating: 2
It won't be on your lap so it won't be that bad. Mobile Core 2 Duo processors run quite cool with proper internal cooling.

RE: Love the form factor, but shouldn't it be an i5?
By spread on 6/15/2010 11:42:52 AM , Rating: 5
Who cares? I'll buy anything that's Apple and shiny.

/typical mac user

By Senju on 6/16/2010 12:20:36 AM , Rating: 2
Me too. If it has APPLE written on it, I will buy it!

By piroroadkill on 6/15/2010 4:48:36 AM , Rating: 5
That isn't the point. The point is that an i5 can potentially run at a lower idle power, and that when you're paying a lot of money for a newer product, you expect that product to actually be better. a 2.4 C2D is not better.

RE: Love the form factor, but shouldn't it be an i5?
By hughlle on 6/15/10, Rating: -1
By Brandon Hill on 6/15/2010 5:03:01 AM , Rating: 5
Well, considering they raised the price by $100, they should have given folks a lot more than a C2D.

By hughlle on 6/15/2010 5:15:06 AM , Rating: 5
sorry, it's early, completely missed the $100 hike somehow. in that case i fully agree :)


RE: Love the form factor, but shouldn't it be an i5?
By reader1 on 6/15/10, Rating: -1
By fsardis on 6/15/2010 11:53:44 AM , Rating: 2
Except for one little problem: The entire Mac line is not selling well at all and the Mini sells the least of all since they started increasing the price. Let's face it, Apple is a gadget/toy maker, their main income is not from their desktops. Increasing the price on a piece of equipment that has 5 year old technology at its core is a bit ridiculous. The old was selling badly and the new one will sell just as badly.

By DEVGRU on 6/15/2010 12:38:44 PM , Rating: 5
Hey, they have to pay for the Foxconn workers wage increase somehow. Might as well stick it to all of their loyal sheeple, because they can. Baaaaaa.

By themaster08 on 6/15/2010 12:57:37 PM , Rating: 4
The previous $699 Mac Mini was selling well enough that Apple didn't see the need for a $599 version, because people like myself will buy one anyway regardless of the price.
Finished the sentence off for you, friend.

By roadhog1974 on 6/16/2010 11:31:42 PM , Rating: 2
I want one.
Don't want to spend that much though.

So don't have one.

Of course all companys sell their products for as much
as they think they can get.

Windows could certainly be sold cheaper.

By Bateluer on 6/15/2010 5:41:39 AM , Rating: 5
My point exactly. The Mac Mini has an extremely suave and sexy design, but saddling it with a C2D is just plain insulting. An i5 would give more performance per watt.

The Mac Mini is Apple's most compelling, non-phone/ipod, product.

By retrospooty on 6/15/2010 8:17:54 AM , Rating: 4
"The Mac Mini is Apple's most compelling, non-phone/ipod, product. "

I used my friends mac mini as my primary system for a month to get to know the Mac OS... Compelling?

Dood, its a laptop without an LCD. $150 worth of hardware for $700? I dont think so.

By Bateluer on 6/15/2010 8:42:20 AM , Rating: 2
I said 'most compelling' of Apple's product line. Their desktops are outrageously expensive and only those people with lots of cash to burn or a complete ignorance of technology buy them. Their laptops are ok, but priced extremely high as well, and coupled with QA issues that Apple barely acknowledges and never completely resolves.

The form factor of the Mac Mini is ideal for an HTPC, but, as most of us seem to state, its priced itself out of its most ideal market while offering minimal hardware improvements.

Its said though, the closest OEM machine I can think of off the top of my head with a similar form factor is the Dell Zino. The Zino's CPUs are even more underpowered, though it does have the option of discrete video. If Dell were to couple the Zino with a more powerful CPU, say an i3 530 or Athlon II X2 240 and ditch the 3.5in hard drive for a 1.8 or 2.5in hardware, while keeping almost the same price point, the Zino would be fantastic.

For the moment, people looking for decent HTPCs are best served by building their own mini-ITX systems.

By omnicronx on 6/15/2010 12:00:59 PM , Rating: 1
An i5 would give more performance per watt.
While doing what exactly ? ;)..

They most likely can't package the i5 with an Nvidia integrated GPU, i.e they would be stuck with Intel graphics.

Have fun sitting at CPU high load while doing things such as watching movies at high resolutions (the new mini is suppose to easily support 1080p playback).

So in the end its how you would use your mini, the ppw advantage would dramatically decrease anytime you are using your PC for graphics intensive tasks, and when idle the power drain would not be considerably different. i.e I don't agree with your PPW assessment, if you used it as a HTPC, you could end up consuming more power.

Do I understand the price increase for marginally better hardware?(that is not even really new).. No, but I can understand the choice of sticking with a c2d.(which seems to be more of Nvidias problem than Apples)

By MonkeyPaw on 6/15/2010 7:41:21 AM , Rating: 5
Well, considering they raised the price by $100, they should have given folks a lot more than a C2D.

Remember when the Macmini was affordable? This product has completely lost it's niche. I remember buying the original for, what, $399? It is now a $699 piece of hardware. I don't care how thin it is or how cool it looks, it's just too expensive. In a world where most companies update the specs of hardware and keep the price the same, Apple goes and jacks the price up some more. So much for an entry level Mac.

By Spivonious on 6/15/2010 10:11:18 AM , Rating: 4
But it's white! But it's got half-eaten fruit on it!

By Dennis Travis on 6/15/2010 12:54:50 PM , Rating: 2
Just a note. The first G4 low end Mini was $499 and not $399. I wish they would have kept a lower cost version in the lineup.

By nafhan on 6/15/2010 8:13:45 AM , Rating: 2
The reason for sticking with Core 2 might also have something to do with the graphics chip/chipset they are using. Maybe they want to stick with the Nvidia chipset for some reason.
Anyway, plastic body instead of aluminum and drop the price to $500 would be much better IMO. If you buy this, you're buying it because it's pretty or so you can tell your friends you have a Mac. I just bought a $400 laptop that had similar specs.

By KillerNoodle on 6/15/2010 9:18:41 AM , Rating: 3
Are you sure that the price increase is not due to the increased manufacturing costs at Foxconn?

By fsardis on 6/15/2010 11:47:06 AM , Rating: 2

They sacrificed 0.07% of their profit margins to help Foxconn workers and to make up for it they charge $100 extra on a piece of technology so outdated that it should belong in a museum. We are talking 2006 technology here, sold for the price of a mid-range modern system.

By KillerNoodle on 6/15/2010 1:22:19 PM , Rating: 2

By brshoemak on 6/15/2010 8:23:48 AM , Rating: 2
so maybe they're trying to keep costs down for the end user

Whaa? Sorry, I must have misread the title of the article, I could have sworn it said "Apple" in there. My mistake.

By omnicronx on 6/15/2010 11:51:30 AM , Rating: 1
I don't think they can combine an nvidia integrated gpu of that calibre with an i5..(as per Nvidia's legal issues) They would have to include a dedicated GPU or use Intel integrated graphics.

When it comes down to it, what will make the most impact for the kind of things the mac mini will be used for? GPU power? (so you can watch HD video etc) or increased clockspeed?

I'll have to go with the former.. CPU speed is irrelevant if you can't make use of it, and I really doubt you can do things such as output 1080p video with Intel integrated graphics, iCore5 or not..

By Pirks on 6/15/2010 12:26:35 PM , Rating: 3
I really doubt you can do things such as output 1080p video with Intel integrated graphics, iCore5 or not
Read this:
and this:

Don't you see that you look like an idiot now, omni? ;)

Stop spewing BS about i5 being unable to play back 1080p videos or play old or low detail games, or else I'll drawn your sorry ass with links to i5 reviews that show how idiotic your comments are ;)

You just have to keep up to date with Anand's reviews, that should be easy enough for ya buddy :))

RE: Love the form factor, but shouldn't it be an i5?
By Phoque on 6/15/2010 5:55:42 AM , Rating: 2
It really doesn't matter, because the users this product is aimed at care more about fashion than technicalities.

By BZDTemp on 6/15/2010 6:10:42 AM , Rating: 2
It is starting to look like you're right. But it was not so in the beginning. Back then it was a question of the complete package.

For a long time the Mini has been a great small and virtually silent computer for those wanting a non-gaming computer. My old G4 Mac Mini started out as a cheap way to try out the mac world and has since changed role to run as a low power server using 1/10th the electricity than an old PC would.

Unfortunately Apple has let the Mini slide in that the price/value has gone from being in touch with none-Apple gear to becoming to expensive. If one only looks at micro PC's it is not that grim but this new Mini has not exactly helped. To bad I think.

By DanNeely on 6/15/2010 6:58:45 AM , Rating: 2
probably the same reason the 13" macbooks are still C2D. THe undersized mobo's apple is using don't have room for the 3rd chip they'd need to pair an nVidia GPU with an i5.

RE: Love the form factor, but shouldn't it be an i5?
By Pirks on 6/15/2010 10:08:45 AM , Rating: 2
That's BS since Mini doesn't need nVidia GPU anyway, i5 with integrated GPU is more than enough for it. Jobs is an idiot. Or whoever designed that stupid thing.

By Pirks on 6/15/2010 12:15:49 PM , Rating: 2
They CAN'T package an Nvidia integrated GPU with an i5
But they DON'T need nVidia integrated GPU to begin with.
Intel integrated graphics + any CPU is not more than enough, especially for what the average person would use a mini for.
Same BS again. Average person uses Mini to watch video and do office work, and maybe play a few old games like WoW or HL2, and for all these tasks Intel integrated video in i5 is more than enough. Read Anand's i5 reviews for Christ sake.

By DanNeely on 6/15/2010 3:26:41 PM , Rating: 2
They can use an nVidia GPU that connects via PCIe. What they can't do is use an nVidia chipset; this means they'd need to have CPU + Intel chipset (1 chip) + nVidia GPU, vs CPU + nVidia chipset (1 chip); having to squeeze a 3rd piece of silicon onto the board would go against small being the driving feature in design.

By SongEmu on 6/15/2010 8:49:37 AM , Rating: 2
Isn't that so they can use an nVidia integrated graphics solution because of licensing issues with Intel and nehalem and later chips?

By ultimatebob on 6/16/2010 8:26:50 PM , Rating: 2
Yep... $700 for a system with a Core 2 Duo was a decent price 2 years ago, but now it's just insanely overpriced.

"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki