backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by monkeyman1140.. on Jun 16 at 4:41 AM

Pres. Obama still wants to end the Constellation space program, which will cost NASA millions

As NASA prepares to wind down its manned shuttle mission, the U.S. space agency is telling contractors to prepare for a slowdown in manned moon research.  In addition to the anticipated job loss, ending the Constellation program will cost NASA millions in cancellation fees on top of the billions already invested in the project.

Over the past five years, NASA has racked up $10 billion in space research and development to try and take astronauts back to the moon.  The most recent budget includes a clause put in by Congress to ensure that President Obama is unable to end the Constellation program without approval.

If Constellation ends, NASA believes as many as two-thirds of the current 7,800 contractors involved in the project could end up unemployed.  It'll cost almost $1 billion to pay cancellation costs to Lockheed Martin, Alliant Techsystems, and other contractors currently working for NASA.

Neither company is expected to receive additional funds, but it's an issue that NASA needs to figure out.

"In a brief check with people more knowledgeable than me, NASA has never held contractors' liable for termination liability," said Dr. Scott Pace, former NASA associate administrator and Space Policy Institute Director.  “If this is to be the new agency policy and practice, then NASA should shift responsibility for termination liability on all of its current contracts, not simply Constellation.  “As it stands, this appears to be purposefully punitive against a specific set of NASA contractors.” 

Obama is expected to discuss the topic further with Congress and current space experts, but it's unknown what must be done for both sides to reach a working agreement.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Ocean > Space
By Kosh401 on 6/14/2010 7:46:47 PM , Rating: 3
Personally, I'd rather see us spending more on exploring and understanding the ocean floor (except in the Gulf, because it's all f*cked up now).

How many new species were discovered after the Tsunami a few years back? Stuff like that I think is pretty cool, and I think as a people and planet we would be better off exploring and understanding our own planet before we spend these amounts of money to revisit the moon, mars etc. Who knows what sort of things we could learn from ocean creatures and plant life? So many cures and treatments we have today come from animal and plant life (reptile venoms, etc), who knows what sort of actually tangible benefits could be down in the oceans.

I'm not saying abandon space - I'm all for R&D towards propulsion, satellites, telescopes, etc. - it's just that I don't think we're there yet to get as much benefit out of going back to the moon (or Mars) as we are from ocean floor.

Anyway, just some food for though!




"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki