Print 48 comment(s) - last by monkeyman1140.. on Jun 16 at 4:41 AM

Pres. Obama still wants to end the Constellation space program, which will cost NASA millions

As NASA prepares to wind down its manned shuttle mission, the U.S. space agency is telling contractors to prepare for a slowdown in manned moon research.  In addition to the anticipated job loss, ending the Constellation program will cost NASA millions in cancellation fees on top of the billions already invested in the project.

Over the past five years, NASA has racked up $10 billion in space research and development to try and take astronauts back to the moon.  The most recent budget includes a clause put in by Congress to ensure that President Obama is unable to end the Constellation program without approval.

If Constellation ends, NASA believes as many as two-thirds of the current 7,800 contractors involved in the project could end up unemployed.  It'll cost almost $1 billion to pay cancellation costs to Lockheed Martin, Alliant Techsystems, and other contractors currently working for NASA.

Neither company is expected to receive additional funds, but it's an issue that NASA needs to figure out.

"In a brief check with people more knowledgeable than me, NASA has never held contractors' liable for termination liability," said Dr. Scott Pace, former NASA associate administrator and Space Policy Institute Director.  “If this is to be the new agency policy and practice, then NASA should shift responsibility for termination liability on all of its current contracts, not simply Constellation.  “As it stands, this appears to be purposefully punitive against a specific set of NASA contractors.” 

Obama is expected to discuss the topic further with Congress and current space experts, but it's unknown what must be done for both sides to reach a working agreement.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

We need to get our asses back on the moon.
By CrazyBernie on 6/14/2010 4:01:11 PM , Rating: 2
I think the importance of this is grossly underestimated.

RE: We need to get our asses back on the moon.
By CyborgTMT on 6/14/2010 6:31:43 PM , Rating: 2
While I 100% agree about the moon, I also feel that it's not the gov. role to get us back there. The knowledge and technology to get to the moon is readily available, abet at a cost. So what you must determine is if the cost justifies the expense. For the government it doesn't. There's minimal use of the moon for NASA. For private companies this is a totally different story. Mining alone could justify the costs of going there. Add in other industries such as tourism and the private sector has a much larger return for the effort.

Personally I'd rather have my money spent figuring out how to do new things, develop new technology, and go where we haven't been before. Once we figure out how, let the others who can make use of the knowledge follow.

RE: We need to get our asses back on the moon.
By Ronmarr1 on 6/15/10, Rating: -1
By Akrovah on 6/15/2010 2:41:53 PM , Rating: 2
Take a physics course. There is practically nothing we could do that would result in what you are talking about.

"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki