Print 67 comment(s) - last by Beno.. on Jun 16 at 1:23 PM

War has torn the sleepy mountain nation of Afghanistan for the past three decades. Now, however, its fortune may change, thanks to the discovery of a mineral deposit wth over $1T USD worth of lithium and other mineral deposits.  (Source: Tyler Hicks/The New York Times)

Lithium is commonly used in batteries (electric vehicles, electronics) and pharmaceuticals.  (Source:

A map of Afghanistan's resouces, along with their value.  (Source: The New York Times)
Military deployment and close political ties may give U.S. ideal opportunity to harvest valuable resource

Lithium deposits worldwide may be sufficient to eventually sustain the demands of an electric-vehicle driven world and modern electronics, but in the near-term, demand-driven shortages loom.  Fortunately, the U.S. has made a pivotal discovery that may help to keep costs in the U.S. down.

According to a report in 
The New York Times, senior American government officials are quoted as saying that a massive mineral deposit has been discovered in Afghanistan which holds $1T USD in lithium, iron, copper, cobalt, and gold deposits. 

The lithium deposits are expected to exceed those of Bolivia, the world's largest current producer of lithium.  Bolivia contains over 9 million tons of extractable lithium, according to recent estimates.  Lithium prices currently are at around $6,700 USD per ton and have doubled over the last few years.  That places the net value of the lithium deposits alone at around $60B-$100B USD.  An internal Pentagon memo states that Afghanistan may become the "Saudi Arabia of lithium."

The iron deposits are estimated to be worth $420.9B USD and the copper deposits are estimated to be worth $274B USD.  A full breakdown (with the notable absence of lithium) is available here.

The U.S. currently occupies Afghanistan, and this spring U.S. President Barack Obama started the deployment of 30,000 extra troops to the region.  The U.S. troops are safeguarding the fledgling Afghani government from the Taliban, a Sunni Islamist insurgency movement that would prefer to see the country returned to a non-democratic religious rule.

That close relationship may allows the U.S. to harvest the resources quite affordably.  And it should allow U.S. corporations to easily enter the country and pursue development of the resources.

U.S. officials recently briefed Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai and the Afghan government on the discovery.  Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the United States Central Command, in a Saturday interview stated, "There is stunning potential here.  There are a lot of ifs, of course, but I think potentially it is hugely significant."

The discovery could provide for a great boost to Afghanistan's standard of living.  Currently, the entire nation only makes $12B USD a year, a figure largely derived from Opium drug trafficking and foreign aid.

However, threats to the U.S. and Afghanistan harvesting the deposit remain.  Paul A. Brinkley, deputy undersecretary of defense for business and leader of the Pentagon team, says that while Afghanistan has a national mineral mining law, this law has never received a serious challenge before.  He states, "No one has tested that law; no one knows how it will stand up in a fight between the central government and the provinces."

Also, he's worried about possible environmental impact of the mining, stating, "The big question is, can this be developed in a responsible way, in a way that is environmentally and socially responsible?  No one knows how this will work."

Afghanistan has little current mining capacity.  States Jack Medlin, a geologist in theUnited States Geological Survey’s international affairs program, "This is a country that has no mining culture.  They’ve had some small artisanal mines, but now there could be some very, very large mines that will require more than just a gold pan."

Even if the U.S. can handle environmental and legal concerns, there's the issue of the Taliban trying to take the deposits by force.  And there's the problem of growing tensions between the U.S. government and Karzai, following suggestions by U.S. officials that Karzai may have committed election fraud in his most recent election.

Regardless, the deposits appear valuable enough that it's likely that the U.S. and Afghani governments will be compelled to cooperate to begin their extraction.

Interest in possible mineral deposits was triggered by 1980s era Soviet charts which suggested mineral deposits in Afghanistan's mountainous terrain.  The U.S. Geological Survey investigated the region, first using advanced gravity and magnetic measuring equipment attached to an old Navy Orion P-3 aircraft and then with a using an old British bomber equipped with instruments that offered a three-dimensional profile of mineral deposits below the earth’s surface.

Most of the deposits are located in central and northern Afghanistan.  The main lithium deposit is located in Afghanistan's central Ghazni Province.  Many other deposits look to hold rare earth metals, which are at present largely controlled by China.  There also appears to be large deposits of niobium, a rare, soft, grey, ductile transition metal used in superconductors.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Murloc on 6/14/2010 11:48:53 AM , Rating: -1
it's good that they found new mineral resources, but I think that they won't respect any standard of environment protection or work safety. They will give shit wages to local people.
These are still jobs, but by letting strangers usurpate their resources they aren't going anywhere.

It's good just for the americans.
At least now we know why the americans won't retreat from afghanistan soon.
They invade countries for petrol, why not stay in afghanistan for useful minerals?

RE: good
By Kanazozo on 6/14/2010 1:21:06 PM , Rating: 3
It was pretty obvious from the moment I read the heading that there were going to be anti-american commentators. It is unfortunate that we have to fear and defend the economic development of an entire country (and the creation of thousands and tens of thousands of jobs) simply because there is reference to the USA or capitalism/corportations.

As a previous poster stated, not a single American company won a 2009 contract for oil in Iraq. Yet, how many hundreds of millions is the government pouring into Iraq for infrastructure, fundamental skills training, and education (sciences and math; sorry, no indoctrination here) - each of which is the basis for a successfull and economically competitive country (whether America is there or not).

It isnt too much of a leap to say that yes, there will be American companies entering Afghanistan to INVEST in the infrastructure to build these mines. This involves water, roads, power, telecommunications equipment and more, not to mention thousands of jobs paying above average wages. Naysayers love to comment that wages will be below average, but you tell me - would you take a job that paid less than the one you have now? No - they will need to pay atleast as much or more to get the workforce they need to operate these things. Overall, the quality of life will improve and the country will be the better for it.

There will always be anti-american sentiment in the world, as there is always jealousy of the king of the hill - its human nature.

RE: good
By LyricalGenius on 6/14/2010 3:15:39 PM , Rating: 4
You have no idea how this works do you?

I happen to be American; just want to say this before beginning.

Where do you think the money to build the infrastructure comes from? U.S. doesn't just hand out free money and join hands with the Afghani (as hard as it is to believe).

Iraq/Afghanistan etc etc BORROW the money as LOANS from organizations such as the World Bank and the IMF, or from the U.S. with a caveat. All the infrastructure work needs to be done by AMERICAN companies (this helps us reclaim our loans almost immediately) and at the same time the countries STILL OWE the money that we lent them + INTEREST. This puts the countries in perpetual debt because most of the time the amount of money the we lend them is based on inflated forecasts for growth; figures that would never be met.

This is no conspiracy theory; it has been documented numerous times in books and online sources.

Have a nice day!

RE: good
By Kanazozo on 6/15/2010 12:38:05 PM , Rating: 2
Excellent - I do feel better informed on the subject. I would say that the focus of your response was almost entirely on one facet of the earlier post, however (source of funds infrastructure). Do you disagree that there will be a great deal of investment in infrastructure (regardless of the funding) that may not have been undertaken otherwise? Do you disagree that jobs will be created using local labor at average or above average wages?

We are all too familiar with perpetual debt, particuarly as the USA approaches a 1 for 1 ratio of debt to GDP. Investments in the things that take you from an aggregarian society (in this case, poppies) to something else cannot be frowned upon. I am assuming (correct me if Im wrong, please) that the use of American construction companies is the result of the Osama Bin Laden fiasco in the late 80's/early 90's. One cannot say if there is a better quality product produced by an American company versus a local company, but surely this is open to bid and the best bid wins. Also, should you reply back I would very much appreciate links to data that supports your assertations so that I may better understand your position.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki