Print 25 comment(s) - last by CZroe.. on Jun 14 at 9:15 PM

Google still says recording was an accident

Google has found itself mired in legal proceedings and bad press after it was forced to admit in mid-May that its Street View vehicles had accidentally recorded "payload data" from open wireless networks. Google admits that it was recording SSID and MAC addresses on secure networks, but maintains it was not aware that the payload data from open networks was being captured until a Germany regulatory authority asked to audit Wi-Fi data collection procedures.

Google has stated that it is now providing European regulators with the data it collected. Previously, Google had stated that it was reviewing how to hand over the data in Germany without violating any German laws. Google is also facing an informal inquiry in the U.S. by the FTC. Canada announced this week that it would launch an official investigation into the data collection. There are also several suits pending against Google in the U.S. by individuals who allege their unsecured network data was captured by Google.

The judge in one of the suits filed in Portland has already requested that Google turn over hard drives containing the data. Those hard drives are expected to be held for perusal if the evidence becomes relevant in the Portland suit.

Turning private network data over to governments and courts is something that privacy advocates generally resist. However, the Center for Digital Democracy is glad to see Google do this. Jeff Chester from the Center for Digital Democracy told the Wall Street Journal that this is an "honesty litmus test" for Google. He continued saying, "I have all kinds of reservations and concerns about having government forcing companies to turn over information. But in this case, this is the right thing to do."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Stop spreading my data!
By CZroe on 6/14/2010 9:15:54 PM , Rating: 2
Once again, the wireless equipment was fitted for mapping the SSIDs and topography of the nation's WiFi offerings and other valuable data, which is not the same as the "payload" data (nothing sensitive about it), so stop saying that they had to install the equipment that captured the payload data specifically to capture the payload data. It's just not true. That's like saying that the camera I used to take a picture of my family was intended to take a picture of the people behind and around them and anything private that they may not want captured. It wasn't. Due to the unreliable nature of the poor signals they'd be encountering, they were probably storing raw data to process later for directionality and other determinations. In such a "promicsuous" mode, it's easy for a rogue setting or property to cause quite a bit more data to be captured than intended.

Shows what you know.

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki