Print 25 comment(s) - last by CZroe.. on Jun 14 at 9:15 PM

Google still says recording was an accident

Google has found itself mired in legal proceedings and bad press after it was forced to admit in mid-May that its Street View vehicles had accidentally recorded "payload data" from open wireless networks. Google admits that it was recording SSID and MAC addresses on secure networks, but maintains it was not aware that the payload data from open networks was being captured until a Germany regulatory authority asked to audit Wi-Fi data collection procedures.

Google has stated that it is now providing European regulators with the data it collected. Previously, Google had stated that it was reviewing how to hand over the data in Germany without violating any German laws. Google is also facing an informal inquiry in the U.S. by the FTC. Canada announced this week that it would launch an official investigation into the data collection. There are also several suits pending against Google in the U.S. by individuals who allege their unsecured network data was captured by Google.

The judge in one of the suits filed in Portland has already requested that Google turn over hard drives containing the data. Those hard drives are expected to be held for perusal if the evidence becomes relevant in the Portland suit.

Turning private network data over to governments and courts is something that privacy advocates generally resist. However, the Center for Digital Democracy is glad to see Google do this. Jeff Chester from the Center for Digital Democracy told the Wall Street Journal that this is an "honesty litmus test" for Google. He continued saying, "I have all kinds of reservations and concerns about having government forcing companies to turn over information. But in this case, this is the right thing to do."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Stop spreading my data!
By Aloonatic on 6/8/2010 3:26:52 AM , Rating: 2
Think, is indeed what I was trying to get the person that I was responding to, to do. Obviously this data is valuable. That is why Google kitted out their street-view car wit the equipment necessary to gather this information. It was not an accident, and I very much doubt that it was the action of a "rogue programmer" either. They didn't just stumble upon this data, like someone glancing over into someone's home. They went out of their way to gather it and record it, for a purpose that is potentially not entirely innocent either.

Also, of course I know that x-ray specs are not real. I was simply trying to make the point that Google still had to go out o their way to equip and program their street-view car to do this. Unlike a home having "no walls" which anyone could look into you actually need to bother to try to see someone's data. They actively went out to do this.

There is a difference between what you say in your final paragraph and what has happened here. You are falling fowl of mistaking what is common knowledge and what you know. People are aware of what they are doing when they walk the streets and drive their car. They do that knowing fully what they are letting themselves in for, what risks they are taking etc. Not locking down their network, they might think that all they are really letting themselves in for is their neighbour being able to use their internet connection. I doubt that they (or even know-it-all you and every other know-it-all DTer) ever thought that a multinational company would be driving a car around collecting whatever data they could hoover up.

If anything, maybe this will be the story that finally makes everyone in the general public open their eyes and take this seriously and realise that they need ot be a lot more careful and security concious than they are now. The days of being able to leave your door unlocked ended a long time ago, the same goes for networks, but it takes a while for people to catch on, but it still doesn't make it ok for a company to intrude like this, as it is still wrong for you to enter someone's home without permission even if they have left hte front door wide open.

RE: Stop spreading my data!
By CZroe on 6/14/2010 9:15:54 PM , Rating: 2
Once again, the wireless equipment was fitted for mapping the SSIDs and topography of the nation's WiFi offerings and other valuable data, which is not the same as the "payload" data (nothing sensitive about it), so stop saying that they had to install the equipment that captured the payload data specifically to capture the payload data. It's just not true. That's like saying that the camera I used to take a picture of my family was intended to take a picture of the people behind and around them and anything private that they may not want captured. It wasn't. Due to the unreliable nature of the poor signals they'd be encountering, they were probably storing raw data to process later for directionality and other determinations. In such a "promicsuous" mode, it's easy for a rogue setting or property to cause quite a bit more data to be captured than intended.

Shows what you know.

"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki