backtop


Print 56 comment(s) - last by Azure Sky.. on Jun 3 at 12:39 PM


BP CEO Tony Hayward  (Source: CBS News, AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

  (Source: CBS News, AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)

  (Source: Fast Company)
But BP has a new plan

Saturday marked yet another failed attempt to plug the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. BP's top kill procedure used more than 1.2 million gallons of mud to suppress oil into the well 5,000 feet below surface in hopes of sealing the well permanently with cement, but most of the mud ended up escaping out of the damaged riser. 

"This scares everybody, the fact that we can't make this well stop flowing, the fact that we haven't succeeded so far," said BP PLC Chief Operating Officer Dough Suttles. "Many of the things we're trying have been done on the surface before, but have never been tried at 5,000 feet."

Since the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded and the oil leak began six weeks ago, BP has tried and failed with several attempts such as robot submarines to close valves on the blowout preventer, large and small-sized domes to contain the leak, a one mile long siphon that only collected 900,000 gallons of oil and now, a failed top kill procedure. According to government figures, between 18 million and 40 million gallons of oil has been spilled into the Gulf. 

Despite these failures, BP already has a new plan in motion. The next step is to use robot submarines to cut the riser where the oil is leaking and try to cap it with a containment valve while using a new pipe to siphon oil up to containment ships on the surface. 

Suttles says that "cutting off the damaged riser isn't expected to cause the flow rate of leaking oil to increase significantly," though experts have mentioned that the bend in the riser was likely restricting the flow of oil and cutting it and adding a new containment valve could be a risk.

"We're confident the job will work but obviously we can' guarantee success," said Suttles. 

The new plan will take between four and seven days to work before BP can report whether it's a success or failure. According to Philip W. Johnson, an engineering professor at the University of Alabama, if BP "can't get that valve on, things will get much worse" and that the new plan is "a scary proposition."

In addition to this new effort, a relief well is in the works which should be completed in August of this year. A major concern for BP is that hurricane seasons begins Tuesday, and they're hoping the weather cooperates while they work on the Gulf.

"What we are trying to do is create an engineered solution so that we can remain on station essentially through, not perhaps the heart of a hurricane, but through the very rough weather associated with a hurricane somewhere in the Gulf," said BP CEO Tony Hayward.

Even as BP readies for the next plan of action, Louisiana residents remain disappointed and are as angry as ever. Hundreds of protestors gathered in New Orleans to speak out against BP's continuing failures.

"I'm a little upset that the perpetrators of a crime that killed 11 people are still in charge of the crime site," said local musician Dr. John, an impromptu speaker. 

 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: WOW!
By Uncle on 5/31/2010 1:54:59 PM , Rating: 3
What is really scary is that usually an emergency, you use your best solutions first, well BP have done that, now its trial and error and hope for the best, and of course LUCK of the draw. A friend in the business says that what was suppose to happen when they had the blowout didn't for what ever reason. The best bet is drilling a second well and angling the the drill into the original line and either continue to pump oil or seal it shut. The stuff that is going on is to PR and too appease the public and make like someone is working on the problem vs sitting back until the next hole gets drilled.


RE: WOW!
By Uncle on 5/31/2010 2:03:29 PM , Rating: 2
By the way the problem here is the depth. The oil companies are drilling at an even deeper depth off the coast of Canada and four years from now if plans continue their going to start drilling in the Canadian Arctic. When everyone knows their is enough oil in the tar sands to take care of North America.


RE: WOW!
By sviola on 5/31/2010 4:57:25 PM , Rating: 3
Well, here in Brazil, we've been drilling over 2000 meters (6500 ft) deep for over 15 years (water only, I think there are additional 1000 meters in salt and sand). And next year we'll start drilling below 2000 meters of water and another 5000 meters (16000 ft) of sand and salt, reaching for a total of 7000 meters of depth (near 23000 ft).

In the meanwhile, we had a plataform explode but there was no leak in our seas. BP should seek out the help of Petrobras which is the top expert on drilling in these depths.


RE: WOW!
By Reclaimer77 on 6/1/2010 10:57:07 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
By the way the problem here is the depth. The oil companies are drilling at an even deeper depth off the coast of Canada and four years from now if plans continue their going to start drilling in the Canadian Arctic. When everyone knows their is enough oil in the tar sands to take care of North America.


Umm it's not like they HAVE A CHOICE in where they drill! Why do you think they are so far out?


RE: WOW!
By Zandros on 5/31/2010 2:39:23 PM , Rating: 2
As far as I know, relief wells were always the "best solution". It's just that it's very time intensive, so they've tried a lot of hit-or-miss things in the meantime. I think it's very interesting from an engineering perspective, but obviously a huge tragedy in any other way.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki