Print 14 comment(s) - last by ajfink.. on May 30 at 10:52 AM

Navy has to wait for F-35 and will extend the life of its F-18

The United States Navy plans to battle an expected fighter gap by keeping its oldest F/A-18 Hornet fighter craft in the air over the next 10 years, even though major concerns remain related to the next-generation of fighter aircraft.

There is a concern if the Navy halts F-18 production, an expected fighter gap of about 200 aircraft could dampen the Navy's air superiority.  Specifically, there is a concern the fighter gap will impact the Navy's aircraft carrier fleet, as the F-18 Hornet remains a popular aircraft for use in missions from carriers.

However, Navy Rear Adm. Mike Manazir and Lockheed Martin said it may be possible the next-generation Joint Strike Fighter F-35C aircraft will be ready for deployment in late 2016.  

Last year, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the F-18 would be phased out as the Navy transitioned to the F-35 Lightning II fighter jet -- but delays, engine problems, and budget issues have led some to lose faith in the program.

The GE/Rolls-Royce F136 engine has been given a lifeline -- for now -- and will be funded as an alternative to the current F135 engine from Pratt & Whitney.

"The Marine Corps is committed to an all-STOVL force,” Manazir recently claimed.  That means “we are in discussions with the Marine Corps on how we would” integrate the two services’ fighters on a carrier.  The F-35C has longer range, more cargo capacity, and is optimized for carrier operations,” he said. “The STOVL [model] is designed differently and so it has slightly different characteristics, so we’re in discussions right now about how you put those two together.”

The USMC plans to replace the F/A-18 with the F-35 as well, but needs to deal with  the same production issues the Navy and Air Force must deal with.  The Air Force hasn't thrown in the towel on the JSF -- and doesn't plan on leaving it behind.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Air superiority....
By Amiga500 on 5/27/2010 10:58:42 AM , Rating: 1
With an F/A-18?

Who they trying to kid?

Navair should have got the Tomcat-2000 or built new frame -14Ds instead of going with the most inept "high performance" airframe in the world.

It is amazing that a ridiculous decision made over 30 years ago still lingers like a bad stench today!

RE: Air superiority....
By inperfectdarkness on 5/27/2010 1:58:58 PM , Rating: 1
maybe you should do some more research before posting. the f-14 was NOTORIOUSLY horrible from a maintenance perspective.

RE: Air superiority....
By knutjb on 5/28/2010 3:22:30 AM , Rating: 2
People who suggest such an idea never worked on combat aircraft and probably watched Top Gun too many times.

RE: Air superiority....
By rcc on 5/27/2010 6:25:59 PM , Rating: 2
Unfortunately, the USN really hasn't gotten anything in aircraft but compromises and also rans since the 70's. The politicians and bean counters all seem to think there is no difference between a 10,000 runway on dry land, and an aircraft carrier.

"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki