Print 14 comment(s) - last by ajfink.. on May 30 at 10:52 AM

Navy has to wait for F-35 and will extend the life of its F-18

The United States Navy plans to battle an expected fighter gap by keeping its oldest F/A-18 Hornet fighter craft in the air over the next 10 years, even though major concerns remain related to the next-generation of fighter aircraft.

There is a concern if the Navy halts F-18 production, an expected fighter gap of about 200 aircraft could dampen the Navy's air superiority.  Specifically, there is a concern the fighter gap will impact the Navy's aircraft carrier fleet, as the F-18 Hornet remains a popular aircraft for use in missions from carriers.

However, Navy Rear Adm. Mike Manazir and Lockheed Martin said it may be possible the next-generation Joint Strike Fighter F-35C aircraft will be ready for deployment in late 2016.  

Last year, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the F-18 would be phased out as the Navy transitioned to the F-35 Lightning II fighter jet -- but delays, engine problems, and budget issues have led some to lose faith in the program.

The GE/Rolls-Royce F136 engine has been given a lifeline -- for now -- and will be funded as an alternative to the current F135 engine from Pratt & Whitney.

"The Marine Corps is committed to an all-STOVL force,” Manazir recently claimed.  That means “we are in discussions with the Marine Corps on how we would” integrate the two services’ fighters on a carrier.  The F-35C has longer range, more cargo capacity, and is optimized for carrier operations,” he said. “The STOVL [model] is designed differently and so it has slightly different characteristics, so we’re in discussions right now about how you put those two together.”

The USMC plans to replace the F/A-18 with the F-35 as well, but needs to deal with  the same production issues the Navy and Air Force must deal with.  The Air Force hasn't thrown in the towel on the JSF -- and doesn't plan on leaving it behind.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Air superiority....
By Amiga500 on 5/27/2010 10:58:42 AM , Rating: 1
With an F/A-18?

Who they trying to kid?

Navair should have got the Tomcat-2000 or built new frame -14Ds instead of going with the most inept "high performance" airframe in the world.

It is amazing that a ridiculous decision made over 30 years ago still lingers like a bad stench today!

RE: Air superiority....
By inperfectdarkness on 5/27/2010 1:58:58 PM , Rating: 1
maybe you should do some more research before posting. the f-14 was NOTORIOUSLY horrible from a maintenance perspective.

RE: Air superiority....
By knutjb on 5/28/2010 3:22:30 AM , Rating: 2
People who suggest such an idea never worked on combat aircraft and probably watched Top Gun too many times.

RE: Air superiority....
By rcc on 5/27/2010 6:25:59 PM , Rating: 2
Unfortunately, the USN really hasn't gotten anything in aircraft but compromises and also rans since the 70's. The politicians and bean counters all seem to think there is no difference between a 10,000 runway on dry land, and an aircraft carrier.

“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki