 Facebook has not only been sharing the visited page ID of the ad-click, but the vistor's ID as well. This can be used to reveal private info. The companies receiving this info -- Google and Yahoo -- claim that they haven't used it. (Source: Typhon Vision)
 Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg insists that customers don't value privacy anymore. Now his company is changing their tune.
Google and Yahoo claim they never realized Facebook and MySpace was giving them hoards of user data
MySpace
and Facebook have both found themselves in
trouble of late, with customers complaining about the
revelation that the companies were sharing private information with
advertisers, despite promises that user information would not be
shared in the Terms of Service.
Facebook was perhaps the
worst offender with this. Its CEO has insisted at times that
customers don't
really care about privacy. And it has rolled out multiple
changes to it page to try to get customers to mistakenly
unveil more info.
Finally after much criticism, MySpace and
Facebook have vowed at last to make changes to make sure that
advertisers don't get the profile link that the click was received
from (anonymizing it). The
Wall Street Journal indicates that
its reports on the subject finally spurred the popular social
networks to action.
It was shown that advertisers could use
the provided link to find private details like name, age,
relationship status, hometown and occupation from a person's
account. Google Inc.'s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.'s Right Media
were among the companies that received dumps
of the links' private data, but they claim they didn't even know
about it and never used it.
The industry advertising standard
(set largely by Google) is that it is forbidden to collect personally
identifiable information without users' permission. Facebook
and MySpace have been known to tread the line on privacy issues, but
in this case the revelation of their mischief was too embarrassing
for them to not take action.
Among the other companies that
revealed links to personal profiles were LiveJournal, Hi5, Xanga and
Digg. Twitter also revealed links, but only when advertisers
clicked on certain links on the profile page (as normal user profile
pages do not bear ads -- yet). However, these links would
provide info on the profile being viewed, not the person
themself.
Facebook went the farthest though, providing the ID
of both the visitor and the visited profile. Facebook says that
it has since fixed the offending code.
States a Facebook
spokesman, "We were recently made aware of one case where if a
user takes a specific route on the site, advertisers may see that
they clicked on their own profile and then clicked on an ad. We
fixed this case as soon as we heard about it."
Unlike
Facebook, MySpace does not demand user's real names. It is only
sharing the ID of users, which will only reveal the info they choose
to share on their page. Nonetheless, in response to concerns,
MySpace is making changes as well. States a spokesperson, "[We
are] currently implementing a methodology that will obfuscate the
'FriendID' in any URL that is passed along to advertisers."
In
a statement Google wrote, "Google doesn't seek in any way to
make any use of any user names or IDs that their URLs may
contain."
And Yahoo's head of privacy Anne Toth
similarly stated, "We prohibit clients from sending personally
identifiably information to us. We have told them. 'We don't
want it. You shouldn't be sending it to us. If it happens to be
there, we are not looking for it."
"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
|
Most Popular ArticlesSource: Don't Worry, NSA Spies on "99 Percent" of Americans' Locations, Call Records June 14, 2013, 3:57 PM Xbox Chief: If You Can't Get Online, Don't Buy an Xbox One June 12, 2013, 9:57 AM GigaHertz Wars 2.0? AMD Releases World's First 5.0 GHz FX Processor June 11, 2013, 3:16 PM Former Palm CEO: Selling Palm to HP was a Waste June 12, 2013, 10:19 AM Report: Apple to Release Larger iPhone Screens, Cheaper iPhone for $99 June 13, 2013, 9:41 AM
|