backtop


Print 59 comment(s) - last by UrbanBard.. on May 9 at 2:31 PM


Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch
So long, farewell! Adobe cuts its losses and moves on to other mobile platforms

Well, it looks like it's the end of the road for any hopes of Adobe Flash on Apple's iPhone OS-based devices (iPhone, iPod touch, iPad). Although Steve Jobs has long since put his foot down regarding the matter, Adobe still held out hope that Jobs would change his mind.

However, those hopes were dashed earlier this month when Apple's iPhone OS 4.0 SDK banned the use of unapproved programming languages (including Adobe Flash). The move by Apple prompted some rather colorful language from Adobe Platform Evangelist Lee Brimelow.

Steve Jobs poured more salt on the wounds yesterday with an open letter that basically said that Adobe Flash's time has come and gone. "Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs," said Jobs "But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards – all areas where Flash falls short."

It appears that Adobe has gotten the hint, and is now officially dropping its plans to push Flash Player onto the iPhone OS platform. Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch posted a response to Steve Jobs' rant -- Adobe's President and CEO made comments as well -- and still feels that Adobe could provide a "terrific experience" on the iPhone and iPad. However, the writing is on the wall and Lynch says that Adobe is shifting its energies to other mobile platforms.

“We have already decided to shift our focus away from Apple devices for both Flash Player and AIR," said Lynch. "We are working to bring Flash Player and AIR to all the other major participants in the mobile ecosystem, including Google, RIM, Palm (soon to be HP), Microsoft, Nokia and others.”

Lynch also said that there will be a public preview of Flash Player 10.1 for Android devices in May and that a full release will come the following month.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No lesser
By UrbanBard on 4/30/2010 1:51:12 PM , Rating: 2
These things are relative.

The Mac has had two malware problems in the last five years while Microsoft Windows has had half a million. Apple has fixed both of its malware problems and Microsoft as fixed about 200 thousand of its. Naturally, this make Microsoft the winner. LOL.

Could you tell me who at Apple has said that the Mac can't get a virus? They need to be fired. Oh! It was the "I'm a Mac" ads which said it? No, you need to look at those ads again. At the time of the ads there were no Mac malware problems and still aren't. Meanwhile, Windows keeps being plagued with new malware.

How dumb do you have to be to stay with an OS which is so buggy? If you don't like Macintosh, then go to Ubuntu. Stop being so perversely proud of Windows insecurity.


RE: No lesser
By Alexstarfire on 4/30/2010 3:42:04 PM , Rating: 2
Just because it wasn't actually said in the commercials doesn't mean it was explicitly implied. And if you say that it doesn't matter what is implied then you would be wrong.


RE: No lesser
By Targon on 5/1/2010 8:33:27 AM , Rating: 2
Just because public reports are quiet about something does not mean that there have been no malware problems, just nothing that made headlines. When a Mac has a problem, the vast majority of Mac people scream, freak out, then call their local Mac tech to fix it, without having any idea what actually happened. The number of Mac people who are sophisticated enough users to not only track down the cause of a problem, but also fix it, and then escalate what they found to Apple or some other "authority" is probably down in the 1% range.

How many people run into problems with Windows and get an honest tech who actually tells the customer what happened? It's probably larger than the entire Mac customer base, so you hear people talk about it.

The ABILITY to get a virus is there with MacOS, the key is that most malware writers don't see the Mac platform as worth targeting due to the fairly low numbers of users, even if they would be fairly easy to scam due to the whole concept that 'Macs don't get viruses'.

The basic idea that the larger the customer base, the more bugs will be found has been around for a long time. Also, the more changes that are made over time, the greater the chance that new bugs will be introduced. Combine these together, and you will get the general reason for some basic statistics.


RE: No lesser
By UrbanBard on 5/9/2010 1:55:14 PM , Rating: 2
"Just because public reports are quiet about something does not mean that there have been no malware problems, just nothing that made headlines. "

This is delusive. All the Mac needs to garner world wide headlines is for a security researcher to find a theoretical vulnerability, mostly in its FreeBSD foundations, which will crash an application, not get root access. Meanwhile, Windows malware is so numerous, it barely gets a mention.

Nor do Mac users scream, because we so rarely get attacked. Two Trojan horses in five years is almost never. We Mac users are our Mac techs. The Mac user groups and website are quite good at warning us of potential problems. May I suggest MacSurfer?

I have run Mac OSX since 10.1.5 and have never had any malware. And I don't run anti-virus software. Occasionally, I will run ClamXAV to check if I have a Windows virus that I might accidentally send to a friend. It never happens though. You seem so out of it that I have to wonder if you have any friends who are Mac users. Do you choose your friends according to their computer preferences?

"The ABILITY to get a virus is there with MacOS, the key is that most malware writers don't see the Mac platform as worth targeting due to the fairly low numbers of users, even if they would be fairly easy to scam due to the whole concept that 'Macs don't get viruses'."

It depends on your definition of a virus. Some people ignorantly call any malware a virus, when it is not. A Virus is a self replicating program which can infect RAM, Disks, CD's, DVD's or USB drives and use them to spread itself. A Worm is malware which replicates by using networks or the Internet.

Unix based operating system, like Mac OSX, have a permission system which tends to prevent any such transmission. If the Macs have "security by obscurity" due to a low market share then that seems like a good reason to own a Mac. That is, if you care about security. Mainframe computers have an even lower market share and they are considered rather secure.

All computer users are vulnerable to social engineering attacks, like Trojan Horses, Spam and Phishing, which fool users into divulging their pass words. Macintosh users are not especially vulnerable to this. Snow Leopard has recently increased its anti-malware protection to cover Trojan Horses and Phishing.

"The basic idea that the larger the customer base, the more bugs will be found has been around for a long time."

No so. Windows was designed to allow any action by default. Only recently has Microsoft been closing down avenues for attack. The UNIX based systems, like Mac OSX or mainframe OS's, close down everything except for what the user specifically asks for. This is much safer than Windows.

You really shouldn't give Microsoft Windows any alibis. Recently, a security researcher found in Windows Seven a flaw, in a no longer used DOS program, which is twenty years old. This flaw gave the finder complete access at the root level. This is not just bad security, a mistake or an error. You have to wonder if Microsoft Windows has any security at all.


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki