Print 59 comment(s) - last by UrbanBard.. on May 9 at 2:31 PM

Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch
So long, farewell! Adobe cuts its losses and moves on to other mobile platforms

Well, it looks like it's the end of the road for any hopes of Adobe Flash on Apple's iPhone OS-based devices (iPhone, iPod touch, iPad). Although Steve Jobs has long since put his foot down regarding the matter, Adobe still held out hope that Jobs would change his mind.

However, those hopes were dashed earlier this month when Apple's iPhone OS 4.0 SDK banned the use of unapproved programming languages (including Adobe Flash). The move by Apple prompted some rather colorful language from Adobe Platform Evangelist Lee Brimelow.

Steve Jobs poured more salt on the wounds yesterday with an open letter that basically said that Adobe Flash's time has come and gone. "Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs," said Jobs "But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards – all areas where Flash falls short."

It appears that Adobe has gotten the hint, and is now officially dropping its plans to push Flash Player onto the iPhone OS platform. Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch posted a response to Steve Jobs' rant -- Adobe's President and CEO made comments as well -- and still feels that Adobe could provide a "terrific experience" on the iPhone and iPad. However, the writing is on the wall and Lynch says that Adobe is shifting its energies to other mobile platforms.

“We have already decided to shift our focus away from Apple devices for both Flash Player and AIR," said Lynch. "We are working to bring Flash Player and AIR to all the other major participants in the mobile ecosystem, including Google, RIM, Palm (soon to be HP), Microsoft, Nokia and others.”

Lynch also said that there will be a public preview of Flash Player 10.1 for Android devices in May and that a full release will come the following month.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No lesser
By Omega215D on 4/30/2010 6:56:31 AM , Rating: 1
you might want to look up h.264...

RE: No lesser
By Lonyo on 4/30/2010 8:45:12 AM , Rating: 2
I look it up, and I see "patent licensing requirements", is that what I was supposed to be looking at?

RE: No lesser
By omnicronx on 4/30/2010 11:19:38 AM , Rating: 2
I look it up, and I see "patent licensing requirements"
I think you just answered you own question. Open and licensing don't really go together now do they =P.

h264 is license free for web use until 2015, but you are crazy to think it will remain that why if it were to become a true independent web standard i.e not licensed by adobe and distributed to users for free.(in most cases)

RE: No lesser
By The Raven on 4/30/2010 12:14:30 PM , Rating: 2
He conceeded that it's openess is debated when you talk codecs:
well, inasmuch as things like h264 HTML 5 are open

My arguement with him is that he is saying that Apple is all for open standards, yet is not OPEN to Flash. I'm no big Flash fan, in fact I tire of it, but I would like the freedom to use it if the OS is capable of it whether I run my own risk of crippling my own system or not.

If Jobs said we don't recommend it instead of blocking it altogether then I wouldn't have a problem with this. But he is not even allowing it, and that is the furthest thing from being open.

"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki