Print 59 comment(s) - last by UrbanBard.. on May 9 at 2:31 PM

Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch
So long, farewell! Adobe cuts its losses and moves on to other mobile platforms

Well, it looks like it's the end of the road for any hopes of Adobe Flash on Apple's iPhone OS-based devices (iPhone, iPod touch, iPad). Although Steve Jobs has long since put his foot down regarding the matter, Adobe still held out hope that Jobs would change his mind.

However, those hopes were dashed earlier this month when Apple's iPhone OS 4.0 SDK banned the use of unapproved programming languages (including Adobe Flash). The move by Apple prompted some rather colorful language from Adobe Platform Evangelist Lee Brimelow.

Steve Jobs poured more salt on the wounds yesterday with an open letter that basically said that Adobe Flash's time has come and gone. "Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs," said Jobs "But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards – all areas where Flash falls short."

It appears that Adobe has gotten the hint, and is now officially dropping its plans to push Flash Player onto the iPhone OS platform. Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch posted a response to Steve Jobs' rant -- Adobe's President and CEO made comments as well -- and still feels that Adobe could provide a "terrific experience" on the iPhone and iPad. However, the writing is on the wall and Lynch says that Adobe is shifting its energies to other mobile platforms.

“We have already decided to shift our focus away from Apple devices for both Flash Player and AIR," said Lynch. "We are working to bring Flash Player and AIR to all the other major participants in the mobile ecosystem, including Google, RIM, Palm (soon to be HP), Microsoft, Nokia and others.”

Lynch also said that there will be a public preview of Flash Player 10.1 for Android devices in May and that a full release will come the following month.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No lesser
By Lonyo on 4/30/2010 4:13:36 AM , Rating: -1
In this particular 'fight' it's hard not to side with Jobs/Apple.
By moving away from Flash, they are promoting open standards (well, inasmuch as things like h264 HTML 5 are open), which benefits everyone in the long run (I would much rather use HTML5 Youtube on my Netbook, if it could do fullscreen, since the non-fullscreen version is much more responsive than the non fullscreen Flash version).

That's not to say that outside the Apple vs Flash issue I like Apple. I think the rest of their business practices seem just as terrible as Adobes, but that doesn't mean they can't be the good guys sometimes.

RE: No lesser
By Lonyo on 4/30/2010 4:14:32 AM , Rating: 2
(no edit button)
Yes, I did talk about desktop implications, but that's because this is about more than mobile IMO.

RE: No lesser
By dusteater on 4/30/2010 11:11:58 AM , Rating: 2
Adobe can't even make make Flash work with IE x64. Pathetic if you ask me. What exactly are all the Flash devs at Adobe doing? Certainly not making Flash work on new platforms.

RE: No lesser
By Omega215D on 4/30/2010 6:56:31 AM , Rating: 1
you might want to look up h.264...

RE: No lesser
By Lonyo on 4/30/2010 8:45:12 AM , Rating: 2
I look it up, and I see "patent licensing requirements", is that what I was supposed to be looking at?

RE: No lesser
By omnicronx on 4/30/2010 11:19:38 AM , Rating: 2
I look it up, and I see "patent licensing requirements"
I think you just answered you own question. Open and licensing don't really go together now do they =P.

h264 is license free for web use until 2015, but you are crazy to think it will remain that why if it were to become a true independent web standard i.e not licensed by adobe and distributed to users for free.(in most cases)

RE: No lesser
By The Raven on 4/30/2010 12:14:30 PM , Rating: 2
He conceeded that it's openess is debated when you talk codecs:
well, inasmuch as things like h264 HTML 5 are open

My arguement with him is that he is saying that Apple is all for open standards, yet is not OPEN to Flash. I'm no big Flash fan, in fact I tire of it, but I would like the freedom to use it if the OS is capable of it whether I run my own risk of crippling my own system or not.

If Jobs said we don't recommend it instead of blocking it altogether then I wouldn't have a problem with this. But he is not even allowing it, and that is the furthest thing from being open.

"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki