Print 97 comment(s) - last by Danger D.. on May 3 at 3:45 PM

Protesters -- Native Americans and environmentalists -- have vowed to sue to try to stop the project after its government approval.   (Source: AP Photo/Julia Cumes)

Cape Wind will provide 468 MW of power at peak capacity. It will be fully operational by 2025 and will look somewhat like this plant -- the Nysted offshore wind farm off the coast of Denmark in the Baltic Sea   (Source: Cape Wind)

Much like with nuclear power environmental advocates find deaf ears in the Obama administration

While no wind resource can be viewed as continuous, off-shore wind tends to be more steady and stronger than land-based wind.  For that reason, off-shore wind is viewed as a very promising form of alternative energy.

It is also controversial.  Property owners hate for their water-front views to be marred by massive, spinning turbines.  Some criticize the wind-farms as too expensive compared to traditional fossil fuel power.  And some environmentalists complain that the farms disrupt shallow-water wildlife.

Despite a concerted effort by environmentalists and the Mashpee Wampanoag and Aquinnah Native American tribes, the federal government has approved the nation's first offshore wind farm.  Much like with the recent nuclear power debate, the pleas of environmental advocates fell on deaf ears with the Obama administration.  Yesterday, the farm was given the go-ahead by U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

At a joint State House news conference with Mass. Governor Deval Patrick, Salazar remarked, "This will be the first of many projects up and down the Atlantic coast.  I am convinced there is a path we can take forward that both honors our responsibility to protect historical and cultural resources and at the same time meets the need to repower our economy with clean energy produced from wind power."

Patrick chimed in, "America needs offshore wind power and with this project, Massachusetts will lead the nation."

The new farm will be built in the Nantucket Sound called Horseshoe Shoal .  It will consist of 130 turbines, each measuring 258-feet tall and producing up to 3.6 megawatts of power.  The total capacity will be approximately 468 megawatts at peak, with an average output of around 170 megawatts.

It is being constructed by Energy Management Inc. (EMI). EMI is a Massachusetts-based energy company.  An independent analyst firm Charles River Associates examined the project as says that it will likely cost $1B USD to $2B USD, but will be able to provide up to $185M USD yearly in power savings.

The government is helping EMI recoup the massive up front investment a bit faster with renewable energy tax credits available to consumers to discount the wind power.  The government will also be offering up $10M USD to help mitigate the impact the plant on local wildlife and on the Native American relics buried in the Shoal.  Still, the project is more independent from taxpayer funding than most.

Mass. Senator John F. Kerry, a former Democratic presidential candidate, cheered the news, stating, "I believe the future of wind power in the Massachusetts and the United States will be stronger knowing that the process was exhaustive, and that it was allowed to work and wind its way through the vetting at all levels with public input.  This is jobs and clean energy for Massachusetts."

The project is expected to provide 1,000 construction jobs over the next few years and create 150 permanent jobs.  It is expected to provide 20 percent of Massachusetts' electricity by 2025 and save over 5 million tons of carbon yearly.

Still the project faces a bit of a fight ahead.  The Native American and environmentalist groups who opposed the project have vowed to ban together and file lawsuits to try to derail the project.

States Audra Parker, president and chief executive of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, "While the Obama Administration today dealt a blow to all of us who care deeply about preserving our most precious natural treasures – this fight is not over.  Litigation remains the option of last resort. However, when the federal government is intent on trampling the rights of Native Americans and the people of Cape Cod, we must act."

Pat Parenteau, who teaches at Vermont Law School, says that the groups are unlikely to be able to obtain an injunction using federal laws like the Endangered Species Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.  The best they can do, he believes, is to delay the project's construction by a couple of years.

There are pending off-shore wind projects in Texas and Delaware, as well.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Waste of time...
By mead drinker on 4/29/2010 1:56:53 PM , Rating: 4
If I remember correctly this entire financial crisis was catalyzed by the increasing price of crude that peaked, somewhere north of 140/barrel in the summer of 08 which in turn caused inflation. Ali Velshi was on CNN always in some diatribe about the increased cost of living, comparing last year's banana prices to thens, people's disposable income diminished and their spending habits were diverted to credit cards. Incomes were stagnant as were interest rates but the peak price of crude was short lived as speculators realized they had pushed the ball over cliff. The damage was done and the bills came in... We missed mortgage payments, stuck with 21.99% Capital One credit card payments, hemorrhaging jobs because there is not one good or service that is not dependent on the price of oil/energy.

So what do we have to show for the financial reset? A lousy proposed wind farm, and a 600 mile radius oil slick in the gulf. What a waste of people's suffering and an opportunity change the face of this country. People this is not the future, this is complacency.

We need an energy race. To a greater extent we need a race to fusion. One like the space race that pioneered technology because of the difficulties encountered in reaching the end game. Things like the Gemini computer and Apollo guidance systems are the ancestors of what we type on today and how we communicate. Then consider the spin offs: modern day cell phones, internet, e-commerce, satellite based services, etc. Imagine what fusion power can branch off into. Then imagine paying premiums to have that technology because we came late to the party. The first to fusion will rule the others. And here's the kicker not a damn soul in a position of power is talking about it.

RE: Waste of time...
By JediJeb on 4/30/2010 12:57:55 PM , Rating: 2
While I agree we need to surge forward in new energy ideas, I believe fusion will be centuries away if ever possible for producing power. Right now short of having the mass of a small star it takes more energy to produce fusion than you get back from it. It takes a lot of energy to fuse two atoms of hydrogen into an atom of helium. Stars have huge amounts of free energy from gravity placing the needed pressure on the atoms to make fusion go, that isn't something we can place in a small container here on Earth.

Fission works because the energy is stored inside the atoms themselves and is released when they break, so fission plants are our best bet right now for making usable power.

“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki