backtop


Print 27 comment(s) - last by Chocobollz.. on Apr 26 at 11:51 AM

Lenovo considering purchase

Palm is having a very hard time in the smartphone market both in the U.S. and abroad. The company is seeing its profits drop and its handsets are failing to sell in the numbers that the company and analysts expect. 

The poor sales of its handsets have led the company to step back and look at what it needs to do to ensure profitability and the survival of what was once one of the most popular brands in the industry. Palm is considering all options, including selling the company. Palm reportedly started looking for a buyer earlier this month. One of the early firms that were looking into acquiring Palm was rival smartphone maker HTC.

HTC has passed on the deal after looking at Palm's books. The most likely remaining candidate for the purchase is computer maker Lenovo. Lenovo has a line of handsets that it sells in its home Chinese market, but the Lenovo handset line has no foothold in the U.S. market.

Analyst Lu Chialin from Macquarie Securities in Taipei said, "A most suitable candidate will be a mainland Chinese company. They've got a lot more free cash and don't have the brand presence in the United States, so that will all give them that boost they need."

Reuters reports that its sources in investment banking have confirmed that Lenovo is considering a bid for Palm, but offered no specifics. Lenovo has offered no official statements on its intent to make a bid for Palm, but its stock has risen on the rumor of purchase.

Lenovo is reported to have the cash on hand it would need to purchase Palm if it chooses – at the end of 2009, Lenovo had $2.4 billion in cash. Palm is reportedly looking for about $1.3 billion from suitors. While the possibility of an outright sale is on the table at Palm, the company also has other plans. One of the possibilities would be to license its webOS to other companies to use on their smartphones. 

Palm may also simply choose to continue as an independent company. 
Financial Times reports that Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein believes that Palm can continue and survive. Rubinstein says he is "bullish" on the long-term prospects of Palm. He stated, "I believe Palm can survive as an independent company. We have a plan that gets us to profitability."

The 
FT reports that Rubinstein points out that Palm had $592 million gross cash position at the end of Q3. It would take almost all of that money to get palm through until it can return to profitability. Analysts believe that Palm won’t reach break-even until May of 2012 and by that point it will have spent $534 million of its cash reserves.

Palm is working on a new generation of handsets that it hopes will fare better on the market than its current Pre and Pixi devices. Rubinstein said, "[Palm is working] fast and furious on new handsets." Analysts at RBC Capital markets told the FT that Palm could receive bids as high as $2 to $3 billion considering it has a market cap of $820 million.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Locked to a carrier...
By Anoxanmore on 4/23/2010 12:02:13 PM , Rating: 2
To be fair bandwidth used to be quite limited for cell phones back in the days of the suitcase, bagphone, brickphone.

Although it makes little sense now.


RE: Locked to a carrier...
By bissimo on 4/23/2010 12:37:43 PM , Rating: 2
I lived in Europe for years and never spent more than $20 a month or so on my cell phone. The whole system works differently out there and Vodafone, Movistar and others seem to be very profitable.

Everyone buys pre-paid phone cards. There are no per-day fees and no fees for accepting incoming calls. I'm sure it's a little more complicated for web access, but I bet few people pay what we pay here. The phones are not subsidized, but if you're only paying $20 a month, have no contract and only pay for the minutes you use, it still costs less.

It all looks like a big conspiracy to me. How is it that Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile all have almost the exact same pricing? What kind of competition is this?


RE: Locked to a carrier...
By AssBall on 4/23/2010 8:03:02 PM , Rating: 1
I don't doubt that about Europe at all.

One thing to keep in mind is that US carriers have had a different environment to work with. There is the geographical/geophysical part: they have to spend a boatload more here on setting up coverage, maintaining that coverage, and upgrading it. I bet another fair chunk of their costs are caused by the queer amount of lawyering they require to keep in line and lobby with the FTC and compete with eachother.


RE: Locked to a carrier...
By eddieroolz on 4/25/2010 9:39:30 PM , Rating: 2
In addition to Europe, Hong Kong is also another market which requires the handsets be unlocked upon purchase. Their mobile market also seems to be doing fine, with plenty of competition and decent rates.

It's a far cry from what I pay here with Rogers; $45 a month for just 250 text, 150 min anytime minutes and network calling. Hell, $8 goes for just Caller ID...it has to be a conspiracy, no feature is worth $8 just by itself.


RE: Locked to a carrier...
By niaaa on 4/26/2010 8:49:59 AM , Rating: 2
I pay 5€ for 500mb data plan :P


RE: Locked to a carrier...
By Chocobollz on 4/26/2010 11:51:47 AM , Rating: 2
Wow that is very cheap! And here I pay €12.5/mo for an unlimited 3.1 Mbps EVDO rev.A connection (capped at 1 TB/mo) ^^v


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki