Print 90 comment(s) - last by Smilin.. on Apr 26 at 1:42 PM

"IDK, my BFF Jill?"
Boys average 30 texts per day and skip punctuation

Mobile phone use in teens is currently at a very high rate and most of those teen users spend more time texting than they spend talking on their devices.

Unfortunately, texting has become such an integrated part of the life for teens and older drivers that texting while driving is something that many do without even thinking about it. According to some reports, people who are texting and driving are six times more likely to be in an accident.

new study by the Pew Internet and American Life Project has looked for insights into teen culture and specifically the prevalence of texting.

According to the study, texting among the teen population in the U.S. has grown dramatically since 2008. Texting has now surpassed phone calls, IM, and social networking for communication between teens. The study found that a full 3/4 of teens from 12 to 17 own cell phones today and that girls in the group typically send 80 texts per day and boys typically send 30 texts per day.

Study researcher Amanda Lenhart said, "Texting is now the central hub of communication in the lives of teens today, and it has really skyrocketed in the last 18 months." She continued saying, "We've kind of hit a tipping point where now teens expect other teens to respond to text messaging and to be available. There is definitely an element of text messaging that fits so seamlessly into their lives."

One key reason for the rise in texting among teens is that teens general expect each other to be reachable and to respond to text messages no matter if they are in class or under close watch of parents. One key finding of the study showed that 87% of teen cell phone owners sleep with or next to their phones so they can answer text messages during the night.

The study also found that girls use punctuation in texts and boys tend to forgo punctuation. Study author Scott Campbell said, "If a girl puts a period at the end of a text message (to another girl) then it comes across as she's mad." Lenhart added, "They have these practices because they've learned that texts can lead to misunderstandings. It's a deliberate thing and it's also part of a culture that's interested in differentiating itself from adult culture." 

While there are bans on texting and driving in many parts of the country for drivers of all ages, many teens are simply ignoring these bans and the evidence that shows texting and driving leads to more accidents. Police say that enforcing texting and driving bans is difficult because texting is hard to spot.

Teens simply say that no one will listen to the bans. Steven Bloch from the Automobile Club said, "What I would say is that texting and cell phone devices have become such a component of life for teens and for young people that it's hard for them to differentiate between doing something normal and doing something wrong."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By jrollins006 on 4/20/2010 8:47:38 AM , Rating: -1
Boys only send 30 a day on average? I had 60,000 sent in a month once. I feel that this study isnt very accurate, most of my friends (guys) send 30 within an hour or so, maybe its just where i live, idk

RE: Wow
By jrollins006 on 4/20/2010 8:51:34 AM , Rating: 1
oops, 16,000. My bad guys

RE: Wow
By Brandon Hill on 4/20/2010 9:09:03 AM , Rating: 5
16,000!!! 16,000!!!!??? What the hell man? :-)

I know I'm in the vast minority, but I sent a total of 5 texts last month. I mainly use the Meebo app to keep up with people (as most of my friends, contacts have smartphones)... and it's free.

RE: Wow
By inighthawki on 4/20/2010 9:14:42 AM , Rating: 3
I have to agree... 16000!? While 5 is probably a little below average, 16000 is incredibly high. If you text that often, have you ever considered actually CALLING the person? You could probably save hours of your time. If the conversation goes on past about 10 texts you should probably consider just calling the person. It would likely end the back-and-forth in a few minutes.

RE: Wow
By redbone75 on 4/20/2010 9:31:13 AM , Rating: 2
If the conversation goes on past about 10 texts you should probably consider just calling the person. It would likely end the back-and-forth in a few minutes.

If only it were so easy. Some people I know absolutely refuse to answer the phone, and would actually text you while you're calling them. I think interpersonal communication courses should be mandatory for this generation.

RE: Wow
By MrBlastman on 4/20/2010 10:01:10 AM , Rating: 2
Those people should be shot and dragged into a creek. They do not deserve to use the cell phone that they have. If they continue down the path they are on, they are going to turn into slimy worm weasles who are afraid to confront anyone face to face and do everything behind their backs or through a neat little text.

I suppose this is one of the reasons I enjoyed watching "Up in the Air," as the girl learns the hard way that sometimes, you just have to do things face to face rather than via a computer or electronic device in an less-than-personal way.

I ignore people when they text me for the most part. I then call them up and politely tell them--"Look, I don't pay for text messaging on my phone plan. It costs me fifty cents per text. Could you please not send me any and instead, either call me directly or send me an email."

With an email, it at least forces them to try and use proper grammar. If they are that bad at it, they will probably call me instead. It keeps people human--hearing a real voice, interacting real time and, best of all, they can not hide behind a device and you can truly get some feel for what is actually going on in their head.

RE: Wow
By Bateluer on 4/20/2010 1:11:57 PM , Rating: 2
Did you ever think that they weren't in a position to talk on the phone? I sent a lot of techs, few thousand a month easily. They are more convenient most of the time, there's a lot of fan noise where I work and its difficult to hear a person on the other end of the phone. Texts are quick and simple, though I make a point to use proper, though brief, grammar.

I'd use the Meebo app more often, but it often drops connects to various IM programs and drains the battery much quicker than text messages.

I do send emails to individuals I know get their emails to their phones though, particularly if I need to send a picture or some other file.

RE: Wow
By Clenathan on 4/20/2010 10:20:37 AM , Rating: 2
What's troubling in my opinion is the breakdown in language. I've heard some people say out loud OMG or LOL. LOL? You mean ha, ha?

RE: Wow
By wifiwolf on 4/20/2010 10:31:28 AM , Rating: 2
Even better, here in Portugal we actually talk portuguese. For some reason I can't disclose, there are people I talk to and they say LOL to me and I stop laughing and say "nice to meet you and hope (not) to see you again".

RE: Wow
By Anoxanmore on 4/20/2010 9:42:49 AM , Rating: 1
That is about what I text each month :)

Althought I have recently dropped that a bit.


RE: Wow
By wifiwolf on 4/20/2010 10:11:16 AM , Rating: 2
when I was a teen, 10-12 years ago, I used to send 400-500 SMS a day for months. Of course, I've always had it free since then. Now only 1 or 2 a day. I guess I've grown up and have something else to do.

RE: Wow
By VultureTX on 4/20/2010 2:12:37 PM , Rating: 2
group texting makes for lots of messages, if you got 6 people all on the TO: line then a discussion kicks in that goes for on 4 rounds of replies by most then that one conversation generated over a 100 texts as counted by the TelCos.

RE: Wow
By Chemical Chris on 4/20/2010 12:07:09 PM , Rating: 2
So, which drugs to you deal again?

RE: Wow
By fleshconsumed on 4/20/2010 9:13:30 AM , Rating: 2
One text every two minutes? Those guys need to get a life. A real life, not a cell phone/internet attached one.

RE: Wow
By Spivonious on 4/20/2010 9:41:47 AM , Rating: 2
Go Phillies.

Just curious, how old are you? My friends text what I consider "above average" for my age group and it's maybe 40-50 a month.

RE: Wow
By djcameron on 4/20/2010 9:52:07 AM , Rating: 5
Back in the day... we actually talked to people, face to face. Just sayin'.

RE: Wow
By HotFoot on 4/20/2010 10:09:28 AM , Rating: 2
lol Yeah... in university I remember my first cell that did text messages. I thought it was great. Pretty much my texts to friends were "are you free?" and "meet me here".

RE: Wow
By Lanister on 4/20/2010 1:46:42 PM , Rating: 2
How often? I think texting has its place just like every other form of communication. Back in the day I would talk to my friends and family face to face as well but maybe only once a week, now with texting I touch base almost daily. I think texting is great as it allows me to get back to the person whenever I am available, I find the only issue being with people who treat it like a face to face or over the phone convo and expect replys within seconds of sending a txt.

Anyways, to each their own, whatever works for you to stay in touch with the people you care about I say go for it.

RE: Wow
By jimhsu on 4/20/2010 5:35:23 PM , Rating: 2
I do hate text messages (because I don't use them, and receiving them costs money). I don't hate them as a means of communication -- I think preferring one form of communication over another is simply absurd. How you conduct yourself over avenues of communication does matter, not what FORM of communication you use. That said, perhaps the character limit and "expected immediacy" of a text message makes its use off-putting to those accustomed to, for example, a phone call or a face-to-face conversation.

Personally, though, my preferred form of communication is email, blog posts, etc. When meeting face to face is simply not an option, I don't find phone calls to be a panacea, especially when trying to communicate detailed information (did you say 1X-B2 or 1X-D2 for the model number)? More immediate forms of communication, such as text messaging and IMs I also find to be ambiguous (does "going 2 ball games" mean that you are going to one game, or two games?) I prefer the structured form of communication that something like email, or a letter, or even this post conveys. Then again, others think that those same forms of communication are much too long-winded.

To each their own.

RE: Wow
By jimhsu on 4/20/2010 5:37:09 PM , Rating: 2
Clarification (stupid edit feature):

By preferring in the first paragraph, I meant "only using that form of communication and automatically assuming that all other forms are somehow 'inferior'".

RE: Wow
By rburnham on 4/20/2010 3:18:54 PM , Rating: 2
Or we used land line phones that did not drop out and had great "reception" to talk to someone, where we could hear inflections in their voice. It was fun.

RE: Wow
By jimhsu on 4/20/2010 5:39:39 PM , Rating: 2
I really do think that phone quality in general is unacceptable, especially for structured information. I don't consider myself hard of hearing, but it is really hard to determine if the person at the other end said a B or D when communicating a ID tag, or barcode, or serial number. And no, most people don't know the NATO alphabet or don't use it.

RE: Wow
By satveeraj on 4/20/2010 5:44:52 PM , Rating: 2
I'm glad someone still thinks the way I do......nowadays most people can't even hold a conversation, its more like.."Hey are you on FB or twitter or I'll text you?"..
Oh yeah I'll just stand here for the next 10 minutes and wait for your FB request before we can about the growing lack of social skills

"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki