backtop


Print 117 comment(s) - last by Ammohunt.. on Apr 29 at 3:36 PM

Cash strapped N.C. looks to milk money out of citizens in its battered local economy

When it comes to internet purchases, you're supposed to individually list them on your yearly tax return and then pay back sales taxes to the state.  Of course, few people do this.  Now the government of North Carolina and other states are battling Amazon.com and other e-tailers to get these records.

Amazon.com this week filed suit against the North Carolina state government -- specifically, the Department of Revenue (DOR) -- claiming that the state's demand for records of virtually every North Carolina resident who has purchased anything from Amazon since 2003 was not only unreasonable, but a violation of privacy.

Amazon writes in a filing for the case, "In re: Amazon.com LLC vs Kenneth R. Lay", Case No. 10-00664, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, "[T]he DOR has no business seeking to uncover the identity of Amazon's customers who purchased expressive content, which makes up the majority of the nearly 50 million products sold to North Carolina residents during the audit period."

If the case is lost, Amazon may have to turn over the records of millions of its customers in North Carolina.  Those individuals who purchased from Amazon (but did not report their purchase on their tax returns) might be audited and face civil penalties. At the very least, they would likely be expected to repay back taxes on the items they failed to report to the government.

In North Carolina, failing to pay state sales taxes is handled as a civil infraction.  Under the codes 105 236(5)c. and 105 236(5)a., citizens can face additional fines for dodging state taxes.  The penalty would likely be to pay 25 percent more tax, except on small items, which would require taxpayers to pay only an additional 10 percent fine.

The fight is the latest in the growing trend of states hungering for internet tax revenue.  Many states have passed or are debating laws that would tax digital downloads such as those offered by Amazon, Steam, Apple's iTunes store, or others.  While many in the public have complained about excessive taxation on the federal level, it is actually the states that have been pushing the most for bigger taxes of late.  The federal government has made some mild efforts to fight taxation of the internet.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: They're not choir boys...
By OUits on 4/20/2010 1:38:34 PM , Rating: 2
I think its more about state governments having to play by different rules than the federal government, not necessarily "unfunded mandates".

For example, states have to balance their budgets.

The federal government can invent money to spend.


RE: They're not choir boys...
By gamerk2 on 4/20/10, Rating: 0
RE: They're not choir boys...
By soloman02 on 4/20/2010 4:29:07 PM , Rating: 2
So its a good thing that the feds can "invent money?" Germany tried that in the 1920's. People had wheel barrels full of money to buy basic items. Being able to "invent" more money IS the problem.

From 1800 until 1902 we experienced an overall trend of deflation. From 1903 until present day we have only experienced inflation. What cost $1 in 1902 now would cost about $25. The reason the penny, the nickel, and the dime, and the quarter were invented was because they actually could be used to buy stuff. Now the penny, nickel and dime are basically useless.


"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki