backtop


Print 41 comment(s) - last by robinthakur.. on Apr 23 at 5:33 AM


HTC Droid Incredible, in hand  (Source: Engadget)

HTC Droid Incredible, nekid  (Source: Gizmodo)
Phone isn't perfect, but is very good, according to reviewers

On April 29 the long-awaited HTC Droid Incredible lands on America's largest network, Verizon Wireless priced at $200, after new 2-year contract and $100 mail-in rebate (the name Droid is owned by LucasArts and licensed to Verizon Wireless).  The phone represents perhaps the most cohesive challenger to Apple iPhone. Such claims have become somewhat cliche, but it's hard not to be impressed with the phone's solid ensemble of a 1GHz Snapdragon CPU, 8GB of internal storage, 748MB of ROM, a microSD slot (with support for up to 32GB cards), an 8 megapixel camera with dual LED flash and autofocus, an 480 x 800 AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, and driving it all, Android 2.1 with HTC's Sense UI.

Some early reviewers at Engadget and Gizmodo got their grubby paws on the new handset and gave their impressions.

Starting first with the look, Engadget's Joshua Topulsky comments, "All in all, the Incredible looks and feels like a modern, sophisticated smartphone with a lot of that masculine edge that Motorola imparted to the Droid along with the curvy smoothness the Droid Eris sports."

Gizmodo's Matt Buchanan was less impressed with the model's looks.  He advocates taking off the rubber backplate, describing, "The Incredible might be the world's first mullet phone: flat, straightforward business in the front, stylized rubber party in the back. In fact, if you pop the back condom off (it's got ridges and it's rubber, it's basically a hard condom), the Incredible's hot-rod red underneath. It saves the phone from verging into boring-as-hell territory. Slightly thicker than a Nexus One or iPhone, but lighter, it feels (and looks) chintzier than both."

Random complaints by the reviewers included the screen's poor outdoors performance and colors (Engadget), lack of 720p video recording (Engadget), and the lack of the software launch button (Gizmodo).  Still, both reviewers seem very enthusiastic about the overall picture quality of the 8 MP sensor, compared to that of other phones.

Engadget says the call quality is great.  They also liked the large storage space (up to 40 GB with the microSD card), but were disappointed that apps couldn't see the internal storage and thus suffered some limitations.  Gizmodo was rather enthusiastic about the quality of the software keyboard, writing, "Droid's single redeeming feature over this, a physical keyboard, is actually less usable than the custom keyboard HTC's put on the Incredible."

Other items of note included that the phone actually managed to manage a connection underground in the subway in New York City, thanks to Verizon's terrific coverage.  The battery performance is reportedly slightly worse than the Nexus One's (also by HTC).

The reviewer for Gizmodo says that the Palm Pre Plus gives the Incredible a tight run for its money, but is undone by the uncertainty surrounding Palm.  Writes Gizmodo, "The calculus is relatively simple: If you're on Verizon and want a smartphone (and aren't stuck with BlackBerrys), the Incredible is pretty much the one you should buy. With Palm's future unclear, and its app ecosystem shaky, it's hard to recommend the Pre, even though its software is generally more usable than Android."

The Engadget folks are slightly more flattery, exalting, "Let's just put this out there: the Droid Incredible is the best Android device that you can purchase in America right now. It's better than the Droid, better than the Nexus One, and certainly beats the pants off of any previous generation handsets like the Eris, myTouch, or Cliq. It's not just a very, very good Android phone (though it is); it's also an excellent smartphone no matter how you cut it. If you're on Verizon right now, you're finally getting really great options for phones, but the Incredible is currently sitting at the top of that heap with a good bit of distance to the next in line... [T]he Incredible just might be the Droid you're looking for."

Will that performance be good enough to hold off the iPhone, which is reportedly set for a big hardware upgrade this summer?  That should be an intriguing race to watch.  For now, though, HTC can relish its early lead.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Droid owned by LucasArts?
By niva on 4/19/2010 4:27:54 PM , Rating: -1
Wait wut?

How can they own the word "Droid?"




RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By Shig on 4/19/2010 4:29:52 PM , Rating: 2
Starwars


RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By theapparition on 4/19/2010 9:13:00 PM , Rating: 2
Strangly enough, no.

It's actually a trademark of the Lucasfilm THX certification. There's a little cartoonish robot that's named "Droid". You can see him in the beginning THX sound screen of many children's movies (Finding Nemo, for example).

If you were ever crazy enough to visit the THX store, they sold merchandise with that character.

Surprised that something like that could be trademarked, and surprised that Verizon chose to license it since I doubt anyone would confuse the two (like Apple Recordings (Beetles) and Apple computer), but whatever.


RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By lightfoot on 4/19/2010 4:32:53 PM , Rating: 2
They are called trademarks and copyrights. Presumably the term was trademarked because the success of the Star Wars franchise.

You probably couldn't call a phone the "R2-D2" or "Deathstar" either. But if they ever release a "Vader" I will have to own it.


RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By fic2 on 4/19/2010 4:48:03 PM , Rating: 2
Trademarks are usually fairly narrow in scope - i.e. trademark a word/phrase for apparel. This trademark then would not apply to electronic products. You have to specify what types of products your trademark applies to. But you can apply for a trademark for each of the areas - presumably what Lucas Arts did. It might have been either electronic toys or games that had LA widen the scope of their trademark. Or more than likely it is the standard practice of companies to make each of their trademarks as wide as possible.

IANAL.


RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By TheBaker on 4/19/2010 5:17:24 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, but R2-D2, Vader, and Deathstar are creations of george Lucas. Droid is just a shortening of the word Android, which has been in use for, oh, 3000 years give or take. It would be like trademarking the word Fridge.


RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By Darkefire on 4/19/2010 5:46:06 PM , Rating: 2
Except "fridge" has long been in the common vernacular so it would be impossible to trademark now. "Droid" is a shortening of "android", true, but Lucas was the first to do it (the novelization of A New Hope actually uses an apostrophe ahead of the word to signify the shortening) and even now only the Star Wars universe consistently refers to robots as such.


RE: Droid owned by LucasArts?
By gralex on 4/19/2010 11:00:33 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, the real word is androeides (and that's singular!)

So who shortened it to "android"? And more importantly, will they sue George?:D


"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki