 Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Mark Fiore's iPhone app was recently rejected for being satirical. Apple prohibits apps that "ridicule" public figures. (Source: Nieman Journalism Lab)
 One of Fiore's prize-winning flash cartoons involved the White House party crashers from last year. (Source: Nieman Journalism Lab)
Cartoonist remains hopeful that electronics giant will change its mind
There's
no denying that Apple's iTunes and App Store revolutionized the
fields of online media sales and smartphone application delivery,
respectively. However, for all the company's success, of late
it has a baffling track record of trying to police
the morality of the apps that go into its app
store.
Initially Apple rejected any apps that overlapped with
its functionality, any mature apps, and any other controversial app.
Occasionally a strange one (like
"Baby Shaker") would slip through, but generally all
these kinds of apps were prohibited.
Recently, Apple promised
to improve the process facing complaints from frustrated
developers. And there are signs of that improvement -- Opera
Mini, a rival browser, was just
approved for the iPhone and numerous adult apps of violent
cartoonish nature have been approved. On the other hand, Apple
still is banning
mature apps of a sexual nature.
Particularly
baffling, though, was the recent
rejection of Mark Fiore's iPhone app. Fiore this year
received the distinction of becoming the first online-only journalist
to win the Pulitzer prize. Fiore used to make cartoons for
print newspapers, but today runs his own syndication business dealing
exclusively with flash cartoons. He does about 8 cartoons a
month, selling for around $300 per site, syndicated to multiple
sites, including his main outlet, the SFGate,
the website for the San Francisco Chronicle.
Looking to use
the latest smartphone technology to grab more fans Fiore crafted a
humorous iPhone app with highlights of his award winning,
ground-breaking work. He describes, "I think the iPads and
anything iPod to iPhone — to maybe a product not made by Apple —
will be good or could be good for distributing this kind of
thing."
But there was one tiny problem. Apple's
developer agreement forbids content that "ridicules public
figures". Apple elaborates in its iPhone
Developer Program License Agreement, "Apple’s reasonable
judgement may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may
be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory."
On
December 21, 2009 Mr. Fiore received the following email from Apple:
Dear
Mr. Fiore,
Thank
you for submitting NewsToons to the App Store. We’ve reviewed
NewsToons and determined that we cannot post this version of your
iPhone application to the App Store because it contains content that
ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from
the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement which states:
“Applications
may be rejected if they contain content or materials of any kind
(text, graphics, images, photographs, sounds, etc.) that in Apple’s
reasonable judgement may be found objectionable, for example,
materials that may be considered obscene, pornographic, or
defamatory.” Examples of such content have been attached for your
reference.
If
you believe that you can make the necessary changes so that NewsToons
does not violate the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement, we
encourage you to do so and resubmit it for review.
Regards,
iPhone
Developer Program
Apparently
Apple found the cartoon of the White
House gate crashers interrupting an Obama speech (among the
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoons) to be offensive. It attached
that screen grab and several others, including a reference to
torture, Balloon
Boy, and various political issues.
Fiore remains hopeful
that his app will eventually get let in. Fellow cartoonists Tom
Richmondand Daryl Cagle ,
were initially rejected [2] by
Apple, only before eventually being allowed
in [2].
Those turnarounds took months.
Fiore remains hopeful that
Apple will eventually let him in. He states, "They seem so
much more innovative and smarter than that." Updated: Monday April 19, 2010 8:55 a.m. - After an outpouring of negative publicity, late Friday Apple contacted Fiore and encouraged him to resubmit the app, indicating that this time they would approve it.
Fiore, however, isn't entirely satisfied with the response. He states, "I feel a little bit guilty because it feels like I am getting preferential treatment. It seems like you need to raise a stink to get something political approved. That's what makes me a little upset, if you are someone people haven't heard of and have an amazing satire app, you won't get this through."
He's willing to give the Cupertino giant a pass, though, saying that maybe they're just adjusting to their role as the world's largest smart phone app host. He states, "Maybe this is just growing pains. Hopefully, they will realize, 'Hey, I'm becoming part of the Fourth Estate'. They are becoming the delivery vehicle, and there are some responsibilities that come with that."
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
|
Most Popular ArticlesReport: Microsoft Eyes Return to "Dying" Windows 7 Path After Windows 8 Flop May 13, 2013, 9:50 AM Bill Gates Gets Teary-Eyed While Discussing Steve Jobs, Shows Off Life-Saving Tech on 60 Minutes May 13, 2013, 12:30 PM Windows 8.1 Will Be Free; Microsoft Holds Onto Struggling ARM Variant May 14, 2013, 2:57 PM Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM U.S. Federal Traffic Board Wants to Make Drunk Driving Threshold Far Harsher May 15, 2013, 11:32 AM
|