Print 106 comment(s) - last by damianrobertjo.. on Apr 14 at 9:26 AM

It will take more than superiority on paper to beat the iPad

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that with the iPad selling so well over its opening weekend that we will have loads of competing tablet computers coming to market very soon. One of the tablet machines that we heard about back at CES in January was the HP Slate.

The first glimpse we caught of the Slate is when Microsoft's Steve Ballmer showed the device off during his CES keynote speech. Some are already calling the Slate an iPad killer and whether or not that turns out to be true remains to be seen. 
InformationWeek reports that some of the key features that users are bemoaning the lack of on the iPad are front and center on the Slate. Things like support for Flash, a camera, SD card slot, and USB connectivity are all featured on the Slate.

InformationWeek also reports that HP released a video of the Slate in action this week that was a scant 30 seconds, but offered enough details to stoke some geek lust in many. The video of the device emphasizes the Windows 7 operating system, which makes the HP Slate much more extendable and open than the iPad. HP is still mum on when we might expect the Slate to hit the market, though it is widely expected to land this fall.

Engadget has a slick chart that shows the difference between the key features of the HP tablet and the iPad. On paper at least it appears that the Slate has the muscle to defeat the iPad. The HP Slate will reportedly cost $549, run a 1.63 GHz Atom Z530 processor, and have five hours of battery life. That is about half the run time that the iPad promises. The Slate also has a smaller 8.9-inch screen compared to the iPad's 9.7-inch screen and a 1024 x 768 screen resolution. 

The base iPad 16GB model is also about $50 cheaper than the entry-level HP Slate. The main ingredient that the HP Slate lacks is the might of the Apple marketing machine and the hoards of fanatically loyal users that Apple boasts.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Advertising
By reader1 on 4/6/2010 11:40:07 AM , Rating: -1
It's basic engineering: fewer variables means fewer problems.

Apple's more closed approach to computing is inherently less problematic. That's why Android is having all the problems WinMo had.

RE: Advertising
By amanojaku on 4/6/2010 12:30:36 PM , Rating: 2
Funny. My Macolyte friend has gone through four Macs in five years, two G4 PowerBooks and two MacBook Pros. This guy is not sloppy; he takes better care of his laptops than Kim Kardashian does her rockin' body. Hardware failures and software gliches have forced him to replace all of his systems and reinstall every 3-6 months.

My six year old PC, which I built, has been rock solid. FOR SIX YEARS. And I haven't reinstalled the OS once. My Lenovo notebook ran for THREE YEARS without a reinstall or hardware change; unfortunately, the motherboard has shorted, but that's expected for notebooks after two years. My Dell notebook that feels flimsy compared to a MacBook has been running for TWO YEARS without a hitch. I traveled the world with both of my notebooks, dropped the Dell and the Lenovo, and basically abused them, while my friend mostly stayed stationary. So much for Apple superiority.

RE: Advertising
By StevoLincolnite on 4/6/2010 3:07:54 PM , Rating: 3
My six year old PC, which I built, has been rock solid. FOR SIX YEARS.

I have an ancient AMD k6-2 300 machine which I have had for over a decade, I used to lay it on it's side without a side cover, untill one day I walked past and spilt coffee in it.
Years later it's still going, and is my Win 9X/DOS/Glide box for playing those old classic games that just don't like running in Virtual Machines or XP/Vista/Windows 7.

However... What most "Mac fans" fail to realize is that... THE MACINTOSH IS A GOD DAMN PC!

PC = Personal Computer. (That's exactly what the Mac is.)
Operating System = *nix variant.
CPU = x86 based. (Like Intel)
Graphics = Intel/nVidia/ATI.
Memory = Basically the same stuff found in a desktop.
HDD = Nothing special.
Motherboard = Probably just a standard OEM rehash, with the usual chipsets.

How can they consider the Mac to be superior than a PC when it is a flippin' PC?

Only REAL difference is the price tag because of the logo, and relatively old or slow hardware.

RE: Advertising
By amanojaku on 4/6/2010 10:29:35 PM , Rating: 2
I disagree; the Mac is not a PC. Apple products are VERY impersonal, no matter how many i's you stick on them.

RE: Advertising
By StevoLincolnite on 4/7/2010 12:51:13 AM , Rating: 2
I disagree; the Mac is not a PC. Apple products are VERY impersonal, no matter how many i's you stick on them.

Stop kidding yourself, it is a PC, it uses a variant of a PC operating system, uses PC hardware, works in a similar fashion as a PC, it -is- a bloody PC.

RE: Advertising
By piroroadkill on 4/7/2010 4:20:07 AM , Rating: 2
He was being sarcastic and anti-apple, I guess you didn't even read his reply

RE: Advertising
By Alexstarfire on 4/6/2010 1:08:55 PM , Rating: 2
I haven't heard of any problems with Android. Care to enlighten us? Or are you just spouting random things again?

RE: Advertising
By seamonkey79 on 4/6/2010 1:33:59 PM , Rating: 2
Love my Eris, just seems to do everything I tell it to do without question.

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
Related Articles
Ballmer Shows Off HP Slate
January 7, 2010, 12:54 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki