Print 121 comment(s) - last by monkeyman1140.. on Apr 4 at 8:34 AM

Raleigh police Officer John Maultsby says the new scanning system is safe and is working to catch crooks.  (Source: Keith Baker/WRAL)

The American Civil Liberties Union has request more information to determine if the scanning violations privacy protections, based on current legal interpretation of the Bill of Rights.  (Source: ACLU)
Raleigh, NC police system stores records of your license plates and location

Would it bother you if there was a record of where you were at all times, stored in a public database? That's the concern that citizens in Raleigh, North Carolina have expressed. 

Raleigh area police have just adopted a new Automated License Plate Reader system that they say will make citizens in the region more secure.  The system consists of four cameras mounted to police cruisers that automatically read license plates of nearby cars (the cost to outfit each cruiser can cost between $18,000 to $20,000).  The results are sent back to the police headquarters, where they are scanned for matches in the national criminal database.

The police say the system is working great.  It has already help recover several stolen vehicles and locate at least one missing person.  Describes Officer John Maultsby, "With this technology, it can read hundreds of plates in a couple of seconds if there are that many plates for it to see."

The system, however, is stirring up controversy.  Some take issue with the fact that your license plate information and location is stored both in the police cruiser and at the police headquarters, regardless of if you committed a crime.  The police have not made it clear how long this information is stored.

Such information could be dangerous if it was stolen.  It could reveal many embarrassing, but perfectly legal behaviors. Given that government databases are routinely compromised by hackers, many worry about the possibility of privacy risks to law-abiding citizens.

Raleigh is home to roughly 400,000 U.S. citizens.  It is the state capital of North Carolina, and the state's second largest city.  Numerous colleges, including North Carolina State University, Shaw University, Peace College, and St. Augustine's College, are located in Raleigh.  The students at these schools are taking note of the debate, and many have strong opinions on it.

States N.C. State student Ian Kilgore, "It’s just privacy. Even though I am not doing anything wrong, and I don’t have anything to hide, I still don’t want people to know where I am at any given time."

The U.S. Constitution contains no specific mention of a "right to privacy", but the precedent set by the highest court in the U.S., the Supreme Court, interprets the 9th Amendment to offer privacy protections.  Important cases that established this precedent include several contraception-related cases (the Griswold and Eisenstadt cases), an interracial marriage case (the Loving case), and the well-known abortion case, Roe v Wade. 

The 9th amendment states:

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Other amendments in the Bill of Rights also been interpreted to provide privacy protections, such as the 3rd, the 4th's search and seizure limits, and the 5th's self-incrimination limit.

The American Civil Liberties Union, a U.S. rights watchdog group, has not challenged the new system, but has expressed its concern.  It has sent a letter to the Raleigh police asking for a copy of their policy concerning the use of the scanners.  The policy would likely reveal information such as how long location information is stored and what kind of protections are in place to prevent its accidental release.

Jennifer Rudinger with the ACLU of N.C. comments, "If an officer does not get a hit when scanning a plate, then there is no legitimate reason for law enforcement to keep it on file for any length of time."

Concerns over similar systems have been raised nationwide in Washington D.C. and elsewhere.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

land of the free
By Uncle on 3/31/2010 1:08:34 PM , Rating: 0
Wake up America. While the Government(Media) have you focused on China and other areas of the world, you sit at home smug, while they are taking your freedoms away bit by bit. You call yourselves "Land of the Free" .MAMAHAHAHAHAHAH. You people might as well line up like the sheep you are, and get the RFID chip implanted now and just suck it up as lack of experience to the realities of the real world. MAHAHAHAHAHA. The Government might entice you with $10.00 gift certificates at WalMart.MAHAHAHAHAHAH

RE: land of the free
By JonnyDough on 3/31/2010 1:17:56 PM , Rating: 2
You seem to misunderstand free press. The U.S. has non-government people in China that will verify a lot of the information coming back through government agencies as well. China is what our media says it is. It isn't just propaganda from our government. Whistle blowers in the U.S. are often protected, in fact law somewhat does protect them - but the public eye protects even more. If someone blows the whistle the media is on them like white on rice, and for them to suddenly disappear would make their story even more true. Then you get the FBI on it, along with some private investigators and it turns into a whole mess for whoever made them disappear. We have some of the most advanced crime scene investigation services in the world, you really can't get away with much here, despite not having cameras on every corner like Europe. A criminal who doesn't get caught is the only good one. A pretty good percentage of them do get caught. Ever try robbing a convience store? I wouldn't recommend it.

RE: land of the free
By remo on 4/1/2010 9:25:11 AM , Rating: 2
despite not having cameras on every corner like Europe


RE: land of the free
By Uncle on 4/1/2010 12:47:24 PM , Rating: 2
"you really can't get away with much here, despite not having cameras on every corner like Europe."
Are you a Hillbilly living in the bush. Look around in the US of A. Cameras at Malls. Dept stores, Gas stations, ATM machines, Restaurants, Intersections, Police cruisers, Airports, etc etc. Oh forgot the on going saga of Laptops from school. A good testing ground of what people in the US of A are willing to give up of their privacy, is the 110 million Facebook users who can't wait to have cameras installed in their homes so they can have someone keep an eye on them. What a bunch of sheep and Guinea Pigs. You don't think all this is happening because people are revolted by this invasion of privacy, they seem to enjoy it and the government will keep taking it away.

"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference
Related Articles
Contractors Plan to Scan D.C. Motorists
October 4, 2007, 9:24 AM
New York Plans New Surveillence Project
July 10, 2007, 12:05 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki