Print 97 comment(s) - last by Ichinisan.. on May 2 at 7:44 PM

Palm reportedly has 1.5 million unsold Palm Pre and Pixi units. It has halted sales, a sign of the company's deep problems.  (Source: Palm via VentureBeat)
Bad news continues for veteran mobile device maker

Palm, maker of the Pre and Pixi smartphones, is facing desperate times.

American Banking News
 has reported that Palm's production halt continues as it is unable to sell the stockpile of webOS handsets it has built up.  There's no official word from Palm, but the announcement seems likely to be true as Palm stock plunged 30 percent to around $4 a share following the news.

Palm has a rich history and helped to launch the PDA and smartphone movements.  Lately, it has struggled to keep up with Apple iPhone and Research in Motion Blackberry smartphones.  And smartphones have largely killed the market for PDAs, so Palm can no longer seek refuge in that market. 

In 2008, Palm saw the writing on the wall and made an ambitious bid to retake the market.  After much investment, it unveiled webOS, its new smartphone operating system.  In June 2009, the Palm Pre launched on Sprint, America's third largest wireless carrier.  

Commentary on the smartphone and its OS was mixed, but overall was somewhat positive.  The interface was much like the iPhone, but it lacked the iPhone's extensive app library and used slower interpreted code for apps (as opposed to native code).  Perks, though, included multitasking and a physical keyboard.

Since the launch of the Pre, Palm has done its best to beef up its offerings, releasing the cheaper Palm Pixi handset and the Palm Pre Plus on Verizon, the nation's largest network (Sprint was the first to get the Pixi).  It also released a new software development kit that allowed native application code via the Simple Direct MediaLayer.  The results were impressive -- Palm devs were able to quickly port both Doom and Quake to the phone, a feat impossible with interpreted code.

For all that effort, Palm's sales continued to slip as it saw Apple and RIM post gains.  People simply didn't seem interested in the Palm handsets.  

Over The Air
 in February reported that Palm had shut down its production of webOS handsets.  Palm claimed at the time that the shutdown was temporary -- just a closure for the Chinese New Year.

Now it appears that the shutdown was not just for the holidays.  Palm's poor sales, showcased by its miserable Q1 2010 calendar quarter (its fiscal Q3 2010), are catching up to it and it is developing a large overstock of webOS phones.  According to Morgan Stanley Analyst Ehud Geldblum, Palm this quarter produced 960,000 phones, but amazingly has only sold 408,000 of them.  The total overstock is estimated to be 1.5 million units, following a 29 percent drop in sales in the first quarter of this year, which ends at the end of this month.  Palm's revenue has reportedly dropped $22M USD over the current quarter.

To put Palm's unfortunate failure in context, Google's Android sold 5.5 million units in Q4 2009 and Apple moved 7.5 million iPhones.  That means that Palm's sales for entire quarter are approximately the number of units Apple or Google sell in a single week.

Even if Palm was incredibly able to continue the sales pace of its Pre and Pixi (which is perhaps possible given its new Verizon contact), it would take nearly a year before it could sell off its stock.  By then new Android handsets would have arrived, a new iPhone, and Windows Mobile 7 -- all while Palm is stuck trying to unload increasingly dated handsets.

Palm will likely be forced to turn to deep discounting.  At first blush this might seem happy news for the consumer, but ultimately it is 
not a good thing as it will hurt Palm badly, which in turn will hurt Palm's ability to promote a successful app market for consumers.

Despite all the bad news surrounding Palm these days, there was a bit of good news for the company today. AT&T announced that both the Pre Plus and the Pixi Plus will be heading to its network “soon”.


Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What I would do...
By tastyratz on 3/22/2010 4:41:22 PM , Rating: 2
If you call an extensively second rate app catalog without exclusive niche products a pleasant experience I would hate to see your sex life.
There is nothing special about a mac that says "I don't need to think about how much hard drive space I have" or "I don't have to think about how fast my computer is" that mentality generates users that when asked how much data they have they reply by holding 2 fingers up in a pinching pose and saying "this much".
Smartphones are advancin so rapidly and their usage becoming so increasingly complex that they need to be viewed now akin to how you view a computer purchase - by spec.

The statement is true because the apple appeals mostly to the most nontechnical usercrowd - the people who generally don't get it. Why can someone own a car and understand horsepower/gas mileage/safety ratings/etc... but not comprehend the most basic fundamentals to the inner workings of a computer (whether mac OR apple based)?

In today's society there is no excuse. I have been using them just as long, and things like "I'm too old" really boils down more to "I'm too arrogant or just set in my ways to bother". Training videos/dvds/courses/personell/etc. is and has been easily accessible to anyone for many years. I expect people on the road to have a valid drivers license, and I also now expect members of the workforce to have BASIC fundamental computer knowledge.

RE: What I would do...
By JediJeb on 3/23/2010 3:29:25 PM , Rating: 2
. I expect people on the road to have a valid drivers license, and I also now expect members of the workforce to have BASIC fundamental computer knowledge.

Depends on where you work. I work in a laboratory and still several here know very little about computers. They don't use them at home so never try to learn more than how to turn it on and punch in the numbers that need to be entered for what they do. Maybe check email and that's about it.

Computers really aren't the be all end all to life that many seem to think they are. Believe it or not, life can be lived without a computer still.

RE: What I would do...
By tastyratz on 3/23/2010 9:04:35 PM , Rating: 2
disagree, Life can be lived without a computer in modern society just as you can live without a car outside of a dense city. Sure you can do it, but the concept has become asinine and archaic, just as the ways are of those who adopt the philosophy of ignoring the "numbers box".

RE: What I would do...
By JediJeb on 3/25/2010 12:19:49 PM , Rating: 2
I would say though that world wide the percentage of people that own computers is not that high. Even in the US there is a good percentage of homes that do not have a computer or internet connection. Some can't afford it, some just don't want it.

“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki