backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by frobizzle.. on Mar 25 at 1:39 PM


RFID Tags Printed on Plastic Foil  (Source: Gyou-Jin Cho/Sunchon National University)
Printing process uses carbon nanotubes

RFID tags are in many of the products that we already buy today and the promise of RFID in the future is that we may not even have to stop at the register to checkout at the store. In the future, with prolific RFID tags more powerful than what we have today, all we might need to do is walk out the door with our carts and our total would be computed automatically. Today's RFID technology, however, is prone to hacking, which was demonstrated when researchers were able to clone an RFID passport while driving by it.

Before we can get to the point where store inventories are able to be done in real-time using RFID tags, we need to have cheaper and more efficient methods of producing the tags and the tags need to hold more information and use less power. Researchers at Rice University and Sunchon National University in Korean are working on a joint project using RFID tags that are printed on a roll-to-roll process that uses inks embedded with carbon nanotubes.

The printing process is able to make RFID tags continuously with a cost of pennies each. The technology for the ink was first invented in the Rice lab of James Tour and was at the time used to print thin-film transistors, which are a key part of RFID tags printed on paper or plastic. Gyou-jin Cho from the Sunchon National University in Korea says that professor Tour was the person who recommended using single wall nanotubes in the ink.

Cho said, "Professor Tour first recommended we use single-walled carbon nanotubes for printing thin-film transistors." Tour says that Rice owns half the patent that is pending on the technology and states, "Gyou-jin has carried the brunt of this, and it's his sole project. We are advisers and we still send him the raw materials." Tour's lab is where the carbon nanotubes needed for the ink are produced.

Most RFID tags that are in use today are made from silicon-based materials. Paper or plastic tags that can be printed would dramatically reduce the cost of making RFID tags. Printed tags could also replace the bar codes that are printed on all packages now.

The process developed by the researcher is able to print one-bit RFID tags complete with an antenna, electrodes, and dielectric layers on a roll of plastic foil. The process still needs to be refined and improved before it is practical. Cho is working on 16-bit tags that could hold enough data to be useful in real world applications and still be printable on paper.

The printed RFID tags are passive and need no power source, which is what makes them so cheap to produce. The tags only give off the data on them when hit with radio waves at the correct frequency. The RFID tags also have to be reduced to about a third of their current size to be printable on packages.

The team is also working on increasing the range that the tags can be read from. Currently the printed tags can only be read from a very close distance to the transmitter. To be useful in inventorying an entire store or warehouse the tags need a range of about 300 meters. 

"Right now, the emitter has to be pretty close to the tags, but it's getting farther all the time," said Tour. "The practical distance to have it ring up all the items in your shopping cart is a meter. But the ultimate would be to signal and get immediate response back from every item in your store – what's on the shelves, their dates, everything. At 300 meters, you're set – you have real-time information on every item in a warehouse. If something falls behind a shelf, you know about it. If a product is about to expire, you know to move it to the front – or to the bargain bin."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: RFID vs Barcodes
By marvdmartian on 3/19/2010 3:34:04 PM , Rating: 5
My question is, how long before someone figures out a way to block the signal of the RFID tag on a product, and substitute their own tag, with different information/price on it?

Walk out with $100 worth of groceries, and only pay $50. Might put a damper on things, until they can figure out a way to prevent that sort of theft.


RE: RFID vs Barcodes
By OUits on 3/19/2010 4:09:19 PM , Rating: 2
You can't really get rid of cashiers at the point of sale then. It will be something similar to self scan lanes today where one cashier watches multiple lanes.


RE: RFID vs Barcodes
By Kurz on 3/19/2010 4:25:39 PM , Rating: 2
Just need a purse with aluminum in the inside to mask the RFID. Man... shop lifting just got easier.


RE: RFID vs Barcodes
By Oregonian2 on 3/19/2010 6:32:40 PM , Rating: 2
That's okay. It's made up by one buying everything in the adjacent customer's cart (1 meter range they said?).


RE: RFID vs Barcodes
By johnpombrio on 3/21/2010 7:42:50 PM , Rating: 2
LOL. good one!


RE: RFID vs Barcodes
By Etsp on 3/19/2010 10:02:09 PM , Rating: 2
How is that different from pulling the price sticker (The barcode type) from one product and replacing it with another?


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki