backtop


Print 92 comment(s) - last by The0ne.. on Mar 8 at 10:13 AM


Apple found that 3 of its 102 parts and manufacturing partners used child labor to help build the company's best-selling iPods, iPhones, and Macs.  (Source: Apple)

The report's brutal honesty is sure to draw criticism of Apple, but it's important to remember that Apple is demanding its suppliers make changes and is one of the few in the industry not to cast a blind eye to human rights violations.  (Source: China Smack)
Company is seeking to correct abusive suppliers

Apple last week aired its annual evaluation of its supplier's compliance with its supplier standards program.  The program is designed to discourage practices like child labor and substandard living and working conditions among the company's suppliers worldwide.  The company employs independent investigative firms like Verité, to investigate it suppliers.

The new report found major violations at many suppliers, including the use of child labor.

The report describes, "Apple discovered three facilities that had previously hired 15-year-old workers in countries where the minimum age for employment is 16.  Across the three facilities, our auditors found records of 11 workers who had been hired prior to reaching the legal age, although the workers were no longer underage or no longer in active employment at the time of our audit.  One facility attempted to conceal evidence of historical cases of underage labor.  Two other facilities presented falsified records that concealed evidence of violations of Apple's Code regarding working hours and days of rest."

Many suspect that at least one of the plants belonged to Foxconn, one of Apple's biggest suppliers, who already is in a lot of trouble for the suspicious death of an employee who lost and iPhone prototype and for beating a foreign correspondent who was trying to do a news story on Apple. 

Many will be quick to attack Apple for its admission that child labor was found to be used to build the company's iPods, iPhones, and Macs at three of its 102 plants worldwide.  It's important to bear in mind, though, that most companies who contract suppliers in China or other developing nations merely turn a blind eye to rights violations.  Apple is one of the few who actually looks into its working conditions and as a result of its openness is perhaps unduly receiving negative public perception.

Aside from child labor, there were a wealth of other violations.  Apple says it "found records that indicated workers had exceeded weekly work-hour limits more than 50 percent of the time. Similarly, at 65 facilities, more than half of the records we reviewed indicated that workers had worked more than six consecutive days at least once per month."

At least one of the suppliers involved had been found guilty of violations in 2008 as well.  Apple reports that it has severed its relationship with the firm.  Writes Apple, "When Apple investigated further, we uncovered additional records and conducted worker interviews that revealed excessive working hours and seven days of continuous work. When confronted with this information, the facility provided Apple with accurate timecards. Based on the repeat core violation and inadequate actions, Apple is terminating all business with this facility."

Another common violation was underpaying workers.  Apple reports, "At 48 of the facilities audited, we found that overtime wages had been calculated improperly, resulting in underpayment of overtime wages.  At 24 facilities, our auditors found that workers had been paid less than minimum wage for regular working hours."

The audited plants were in China, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, the Czech Republic, Philippines and the U.S., though Apple did not reveal exact locations or the name of the suppliers. 

The full report, Supplier Responsibility, is available here (PDF).

One can only hope that people view Apple's honest evaluation of its own supply chain's shortcomings in a positive light -- otherwise other firms will have little incentive to similarly monitor their own supply chains for abuse.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I'm not defending Apple but...
By whiskerwill on 3/3/2010 10:19:28 AM , Rating: 3
What do you want them to "do about it"? The sad fact is that these 15 year olds would either be working 8 hours a day in a Foxconn factory, or working 12 hours a day in the rice fields, under much more brutal conditions.

The problem here isn't "American megacorporations", its the poor standard of living in many parts of Asia.


RE: I'm not defending Apple but...
By Aloonatic on 3/3/2010 10:34:57 AM , Rating: 4
Almost every industrailised country goes through this period at some stage. I'm pretty sure it will have happened in the USA. Sure did in Britain tho.

I'm not saying that it's right or anyhting of course, I'd love to live in a world where their generation went straiught from the fields to the laboratory. However, whilst their economy is growing, the cheap labour that these kids are capable of providing (whilst being in much safer conditions thatn our great great grand parents where when they worked in cotton mills or wherever) is laying the foundations for an ecconomy that will be able to provide education upto 16/18 for all, further education and so on.

It's pretty much impossible for an ecconomy to go from agricultural to tehcnological without as mass production/labour filled period inbetween to underpin the transition, especially in these globalised times, as these kids and their cheap labour gives their country a competative edge. Else we might as well make the stuff here and they wouldn't have a job at all, and would stay in the 1800s forever.

It doesn't make it right for them to be grossly exploited or abused of course, if that is going on, then that is very wrong.


RE: I'm not defending Apple but...
By whiskerwill on 3/3/2010 10:55:06 AM , Rating: 4
But of course the emotional appeal to "save the children!" will always win out against common sense.

I honestly think human IQs are dropping over time.


RE: I'm not defending Apple but...
By therealnickdanger on 3/3/2010 11:31:24 AM , Rating: 3
I think IQs are just as low as ever, but pandering emotional manipulation is at an all-time high. We're bombarded with emotional blitzes every day by politicians, sports figures, celebrity gossip, religions, advertisements, (news covers all these) etc. In reality, they are ALL distractions designed (intentionally designed) to destroy intelligent discourse, to divide, conquer, and sell you things and ideas... most of it you don't even know you're "buying".

I'm not one for conspiracy theories and such, but I found the overall message of the documentary "Fall Of The Republic" to be very enlightened.


By afkrotch on 3/3/2010 10:32:06 PM , Rating: 2
Hold on. I need to find out what Beyonce thinks of this post. BRB.


By FITCamaro on 3/4/2010 6:31:51 AM , Rating: 2
I don't think IQs are low. IQ is just a measure of potential. Kids today just aren't applying themselves.


By computergeek485 on 3/3/2010 8:45:56 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I honestly think human IQs are dropping over time.


I feel like its also true and the movie idiocracy does a great job illustrating that in the beginning


By afkrotch on 3/3/2010 10:31:00 PM , Rating: 2
It has happened in the US. Hence why they invented unions.


"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki